Conozca el nuevo sitio de "Achieva" hablenos a nuestras oficinas en
Monterrey o visite la zona de contacto y pregunte todas sus dudas
Si no puedes ver las imagenes pulsa (mostrar imagenes)
I have Areca 1210 and 1220 RAID Controllers in a number of OpenBSD
servers.
The arc man page says "arc supports alarm control and monitoring of
volumes configured on the controllers via the bio(4) interface and the
bioctl(8) utility."
However, when I try to silence an alarm, I get the following:
[IMAGE]
WSI, Pms de Mixico & Adsmedia presentan:
Congreso Nacional Internet Marketing Evolution
Presentando las tematicas y tendencias mas innovadoras que le permitan
desarrollar una estrategia de MKT Digital apropiada a su necesidad.
Presentacisn Exclusiva: 30 de Septiembre Ciudad de Mixico
Traemo
Hi,
I've looked for a mailing list for OpenBGPD but come up empty. If there's
a better place to report this, please let me know.
I'm using OpenBGPD as a fairly large route collector. In total, about 75
neighbors announcing ~21 million prefixes. This is
openbgpd-4.9.20110612_1 running on FreeBS
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 10:31:15PM +0200, ropers wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Loganaden Velvindron wrote:
> >> If other BSDs worked this way, they would have been
> >> successful in attracting a larger userbase. They
> >> have the means to do it with their larger developer
> >> commu
Why not ? Sure it's easier to control a group if it's small.
You can also delegate authority to experienced people
for different areas. This is currently done in openbsd.
The BSD community is very small compared to Linux. As an example,
in Mauritius, there are 2 BSD users (Mac OS X doesn't count
I was posting to advoc...@openbsd.org, but only SPAM seems to function on
that list?
http://youcanlinux.wordpress.com/my-thoughts-on-openbsd/
31 Aug 2011
I was driving home Sunday and there was a Lamborghini Diablo VT driving
nearby. I caught up to it and it made an unusual soundb&. very distinc
hmm, on Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:43:28AM -0500, Marco Peereboom said that
> > > My Internet is AT&T U-verse, so you may be right about the crappy DNS. I
> > > will try changing it to OpenDNS or Google's DNS and see if that helps...
> >
> > give pdnsd a try. one realises how slow dns can be without
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:32:20PM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
> hmm, on Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 08:32:23AM -0500, Bryan said that
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:23, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> > > That sounds more like crappy DNS or filtered Internet. I can't speak
> > > for chromium but webkit like
hmm, on Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 08:32:23AM -0500, Bryan said that
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:23, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> > That sounds more like crappy DNS or filtered Internet. I can't speak
> > for chromium but webkit likes >= 256 files >= 16384 stack. Adsuck can
> > go a long way making the s
Is the server far away from you? The only way to properly fixx this issue is to
boot in single mode!
--Original Message--
From: Marcos Ariel Laufer
Sender: owner-m...@openbsd.org
To: Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
Cc: Lars Hansson
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: What should I do wit
On Aug 30, 2011, at 2:34 AM, Martin Schrvder wrote:
> 2011/8/30 Paul Suh :
>> I'm looking for a mini-ITX motherboard with at least 4 x Gig-E ports. I
would
>
> Not a board, but full computers:
>
http://www.lannerinc.com/Embedded_Computing/All-Purpose_Box_Computers/LEC-212
6
>
http://www.lannerinc.
2011/8/31 Paul Suh :
> a data center with multiple machines behind the routers I really want
> something that can support ~500 Gbps so that we can use the full speed that we
500 _G_bps? Please tell us when you've found something that can handle that. :-)
Best
Martin
On Aug 30, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2011-08-29, Paul Suh wrote:
>> I'm looking for a mini-ITX motherboard with at least 4 x Gig-E ports. I
would
>> like to fit two of them into a 1U, dual mini-ITX case to have a
CARP/SASYNC
>> pair with connections to external, internal, and
On Aug 30, 2011, at 2:03 AM, Johan Linner wrote:
> We're running OpenBSD 4.9 on:
> http://www.mini-itx.com/store/?c=47#jnc92-330
>
> with Jetway 3x Gigabit LAN Motherboard Modules:
> http://www.mini-itx.com/store/?c=34#modules
>
> Works great.
Johan,
Thanks for the info!
--Paul
[demime 1.0
On Aug 30, 2011, at 3:18 AM, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> Are you putting two boards in one case for redundancy / high
> availability ? So that, when one fails the other can ... be taken
> down too to fix the first one ?
Paul,
As far as I can tell. The two sides are fully independent of each other. A
On Aug 30, 2011, at 3:08 AM, Henrique Antsnio Evaristo wrote:
> Humm, nice ... I was interested in knowing the power consumption of that
setup.
> Do you have any possibility to provide that ?
> Thanks.
>
> Best regards,
> Henrique
Henrique,
I will be in a position to post on power consumption of
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Josh Hoppes wrote:
> Why are you using "set nexthop self" and then trying to change that
> with the filter "allow quick to 172.29.1.52 set nexthop 172.29.1.200".
> If you don't want your nexthop to be yourself don't tell bgpd to do
> that.
>
>
To show a bug in bgp
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 04:32:14PM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
> hmm, on Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 04:23:18PM +0200, Gilles Chehade said that
> > http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/openbsd-misc/2008/11/10/4051954
>
> a mail you will probably never forgive me :]
>
Not at all, I just recalled that ran
hmm, on Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 04:23:18PM +0200, Gilles Chehade said that
> http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/openbsd-misc/2008/11/10/4051954
a mail you will probably never forgive me :]
good luck with the project :]
-f
--
i know someone with the exact same name! really? who?
Why are you using "set nexthop self" and then trying to change that
with the filter "allow quick to 172.29.1.52 set nexthop 172.29.1.200".
If you don't want your nexthop to be yourself don't tell bgpd to do
that.
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Tony Sarendal wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:0
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:11:52AM -0400, swilly wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 19:51, frantisek holop wrote:
> > why would i _not_ use another free alternative with a spotless security
> > record, that has small, isolated processes communicating with each other
> > in chroot, outputting very ni
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 19:51, frantisek holop wrote:
> why would i _not_ use another free alternative with a spotless security
> record, that has small, isolated processes communicating with each other
> in chroot, outputting very nice logs, having human readable
> configuration with fantastic do
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:23 PM, lancebaynes87
> wrote:
> > Are there any solutions?
> >
> > B I can't SSH to it anymore, because it asks for password.
> >
> > B Does anybody knows a solution for this problem??
>
>
If you have a NIM server,
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 08:32:23AM -0500, Bryan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:23, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> > That sounds more like crappy DNS or filtered Internet. I can't speak
> > for chromium but webkit likes >= 256 files >= 16384 stack. Adsuck can
> > go a long way making the surfing e
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Bryan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:23, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> > That sounds more like crappy DNS or filtered Internet. I can't speak
> > for chromium but webkit likes >= 256 files >= 16384 stack. Adsuck can
> > go a long way making the surfing experience better too
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:23, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> That sounds more like crappy DNS or filtered Internet. I can't speak
> for chromium but webkit likes >= 256 files >= 16384 stack. Adsuck can
> go a long way making the surfing experience better too. BTW you can't
> update things willy nill
First, check the syntax refering to hostname.if(5) openbsd manual guide
Did you configure it during installation process or after installation process
was done?
What do you mean by giving you login and password?
Which user did you use to configure IP address? Did you login as root or as
another
That sounds more like crappy DNS or filtered Internet. I can't speak
for chromium but webkit likes >= 256 files >= 16384 stack. Adsuck can
go a long way making the surfing experience better too. BTW you can't
update things willy nilly, you have to do pretty much all of it at once.
On Tue, Aug 3
Ok, thank you a lot for your replay.
Have you ever try to use ikev2 ? using iked and so win7 have ikev2
support.
I tried to use it (iked) but no success... :(
If you can take a eye on it.
Cheers,
Wesley M.
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 19:07:49 +0800, Zak Elep
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 6:30 PM, We
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Wesley M. wrote:
> What is the best way to build a vpn between an OpenBSD 4.9 gateway
> and a Win7 workstation ?
I got this working here on our network, both for Win7 and Ubuntu
clients going to an OpenBSD gateway.
On the gateway, have /etc/ipsec.conf say somethi
Si no puede ver este anuncio, haga click aqum
Especialmzate e insirtate en el mercado laboral con un click
Cursos en Mixico
Cursos en Mixico
Cursos en Mixico
Cursos en Mixico
Cursos en Mixico
Cursos en Mixico
Cursos en Mixico
Cursos en Mixico
Para mayor informacisn, llene sus datos hacien
Lot of thanks to all who tried to help denisovigor1...@rambler.ru. I
should read the FAQ first, problem is solved.
Hi
What is the best way to build a vpn between an OpenBSD 4.9 gateway
and a Win7 workstation ?
Thank you very much for your advices.
All the
best,
Wesley M.
Cannot configure internet with static IP address
hostname.fc0
inet IP mask
and nothing works. They gave me login and password, may be this is the
case?
--
igor denisov.
Henrique Antsnio Evaristo skrev 2011-08-30 09:08:
Humm, nice ... I was interested in knowing the power consumption of that setup.
Do you have any possibility to provide that ?
Thanks.
Best regards,
Henrique
We're using 1U chassis:
http://mini-itx.com/store/?c=33#p3809
Around 45-50W under "no
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Andre Keller wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 31.08.2011 10:23, schrieb Tony Sarendal:
> > Sender says next hop = 172.29.1.100, receiver says .51.
> > show rib out in this case shows incorrect nexthop.
>
> Well thats kind of the point of having set nexthop self in the config..
Hi
Am 31.08.2011 10:23, schrieb Tony Sarendal:
> Sender says next hop = 172.29.1.100, receiver says .51.
> show rib out in this case shows incorrect nexthop.
Well thats kind of the point of having set nexthop self in the config...
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Patrick Lamaiziere
wrote:
> Le Wed, 31 Aug 2011 07:19:15 +0200,
> Tony Sarendal a icrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> > current1# cat /etc/bgpd.conf
> > AS 65001
> > network 10.0.1.0/24
> >
> > current1# bgpctl show rib nei 172.29.1.52 out
> > flags: * = Valid, > = Selected, I =
Hi,
You will find your solution here : http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/ftp.html
Best regards,
Wesley MOUEDINE ASSABY
http://mouedine.net/ruleset49.aspx
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 23:38:41 -0700, fqui nonez
wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have a ftpd server box, OBSD-4.9, and pflog shows:
>
> Aug 29 10:11:03.5
On 31/08/2011, at 7:16 PM, matteo filippetto wrote:
> 2011/8/31 fqui nonez :
>> Hello
>>
>> I have a ftpd server box, OBSD-4.9, and pflog shows:
>>
>> Aug 29 10:11:03.520900 rule 3/(match) pass in on rl0:
>> 190.87.195.241.2732 > 192.168.5.2.21: S 2008995709:2008995709(0) win
>> 65535
>> Aug 29 1
Le Wed, 31 Aug 2011 07:19:15 +0200,
Tony Sarendal a C)crit :
Hi,
> current1# cat /etc/bgpd.conf
> AS 65001
> network 10.0.1.0/24
>
> current1# bgpctl show rib nei 172.29.1.52 out
> flags: * = Valid, > = Selected, I = via IBGP, A = Announced
> origin: i = IGP, e = EGP, ? = Incomplete
>
> flags
Hi all,
Is not so hard at it seems: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq1.html
Why is Apache included? It isn't needed by many people!
Because the developers want it.
Why isn't a newer version of Apache included?
The license on newer versions is unacceptable.
If you need/want another httpd, go to th
>flags destination gateway lpref med aspath origin
>AI*>
10.0.1.0/24 172.29.1.200 100 0 i
>current1#
What is
incorrect on this ?
2011/8/31 fqui nonez :
> Hello
>
> I have a ftpd server box, OBSD-4.9, and pflog shows:
>
> Aug 29 10:11:03.520900 rule 3/(match) pass in on rl0:
> 190.87.195.241.2732 > 192.168.5.2.21: S 2008995709:2008995709(0) win
> 65535
> Aug 29 10:15:52.825409 rule 3/(match) pass in on rl0:
> 190.87.195.241.
45 matches
Mail list logo
