9 de octubre actividad de capacitacisn en: Gestisn efectiva de clientes
Montevideo, Hotel Lafayette
Si no visualiza la invitacisn puede solicitar el folleto electrsnico por esta
misma vma. Gracias.
CUPOS LIMITADOS
Informes y reservas: 2315-3330
Este mail no es spam. Si usted entiende que le fu
Updated.
I very rarely install the last couple of years.
Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 01:35:06PM -0500, eagir...@cox.net wrote:
> > I installed the 2 October snapshot yesterday, and after the reboot got a
> > panic.
>
> You "installed"? Not "updated"?
>
> >
> > I boote
Connaissez-vous la signification du mot
B+ PROCRASTINER B; ?
Si c'est le cas, il est indiscutable
que les techniques de gestion du temps vous
sont familiC(res, ou
du moins, que vous vous y intC)ressez
activement. M
On 10/03/10 22:11, David Higgs wrote:
> I am building a replacement router/firewall for home use
stop there.
You aren't General Motors, Yahoo, or Google.
You are looking to spend a lot of time and money trying to optimize
performance on a super-fast-sport-car that will be only used to go to
and f
I am building a replacement router/firewall for home use and am
soliciting suggestions/commentary/alternatives on the components
below.
I've heard good things on the list about Supermicro boards; any
surprises with their Atom D510 embedded boxes? Looks like em(4)
support, which I believe is is an
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> Then why is it placed there in the FAQ entry? Somebody thought there's a
> relation there.
>
> IMHO, I think ksh should be able to read .profile by default.
>
> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda <
> acam...@verlet.o
On Sun, 3 Oct 2010 22:24:18 +0200, you wrote:
>well, it is easy enough to verify - use something else but re. if it's
>stable, we have the guilty party, at least.
Yea, I'm sort of stuck with re. Here's a few quick images of these boxes. It's
a
Jetway NF76 board with a daughter card with 3 RTL8110
On Sun, 3 Oct 2010 22:41:50 +0200, you wrote:
>err... reading the trace first helps. this is actually pretty clearly a
>problem in re. I don't feel responsible for re tho :)
Is there something else I should do before submitting something to bugs?
Both of these source files haven't been modified
> Subject:Re: panic on 2 October and 3 October snapshots
> From: Theo de Raadt
> Date: 2010-10-03 19:24:19
> Message-ID: 201010031924.o93JOJb1029879 () cvs ! openbsd ! org
> [Download message RAW]
>
> > > I installed the 2 October snapshot yesterday, and after the reboot got a
>
Szanowni Panstwo,
Zwracam sie z pytaniem, czy jestescie Panstwo zainteresowani jednorazowym
otrzymaniem oferty tlumaczen pisemnych.
Pozdrawiam,
ETLUMACZENIA
*Niniejsze zapytanie nie jest informacja handlowa, a jedynie pytaniem** o zgode
na przesylanie informacji handlowych droga elektroniczn
[IMAGE]
Mayores informes responda este correo electrsnico con los siguientes
datos.
Empresa:
Nombre:
Telifono:
Email:
Nzmero de Interesados:
Y en breve le haremos llegar la informacisn completa del evento.
O bien comunmquense a nuestros telifonos un ejecutivo con gusto le
atendera
Tels. (33) 885
Then why is it placed there in the FAQ entry? Somebody thought there's a
relation there.
IMHO, I think ksh should be able to read .profile by default.
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda <
acam...@verlet.org> wrote:
> .Xdefaults has nothing to do with .profile ...
* Henning Brauer [2010-10-03 22:28]:
> * Steve W [2010-10-03 22:16]:
> > On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:57:10 +0200, you wrote:
> > >sigh. use-after-free (most likely, at least) somewhere. unlikely to be
> > >carp itself. might be re (wild guess).
> >
> > I think your "somewhere near re" theory might ha
* Steve W [2010-10-03 22:16]:
> On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:57:10 +0200, you wrote:
> >sigh. use-after-free (most likely, at least) somewhere. unlikely to be
> >carp itself. might be re (wild guess).
>
> I think your "somewhere near re" theory might have some merrit to it. :)
well, it is easy enough
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:57:10 +0200, you wrote:
>sigh. use-after-free (most likely, at least) somewhere. unlikely to be
>carp itself. might be re (wild guess).
I think your "somewhere near re" theory might have some merrit to it. :)
I've had a number of crashes over the past couple days, but this
> And even then, since it is code from other people, it still might have a
> bug in it regarding the malloc flags -- either of those is now required,
> as the assert says.
But remember, the flags value changed. The lkm source might be correct -
it just needs to be recompiled to match the kernel it
> > And even then, since it is code from other people, it still might have a
> > bug in it regarding the malloc flags -- either of those is now required,
> > as the assert says.
>
> But remember, the flags value changed. The lkm source might be correct -
it might be correct.
> it just needs to b
> > I installed the 2 October snapshot yesterday, and after the reboot got a
> > panic.
> >
> > I booted again from the RAMdisk kernel, point to the 3 October snaphot and
> > ignored the hash mismatch, and panicked again. Trace and ps for each below.
>
> You are mixing a recent snapshot and an
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 01:35:06PM -0500, eagir...@cox.net wrote:
> I installed the 2 October snapshot yesterday, and after the reboot got a
> panic.
You "installed"? Not "updated"?
>
> I booted again from the RAMdisk kernel, point to the 3 October snaphot and
> ignored the hash mismatch, and
> I installed the 2 October snapshot yesterday, and after the reboot got a
> panic.
>
> I booted again from the RAMdisk kernel, point to the 3 October snaphot and
> ignored the hash mismatch, and panicked again. Trace and ps for each below.
You are mixing a recent snapshot and an lkm which has
I installed the 2 October snapshot yesterday, and after the reboot got a panic.
I booted again from the RAMdisk kernel, point to the 3 October snaphot and
ignored the hash mismatch, and panicked again. Trace and ps for each below.
--
Ed Ahlsen-Girard
Ft. Walton Beach FL
trace for 2 October snap
Okay, and the divert (4) man page says that outbound packets,
after being reinjected, "are processed directly by the relevant
IP/IPv6 output function," so I probably can't get pf to take
another look at them so that "route-to" will apply.
If I were feeling brave and wanted to mess with this in the
Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> You seem to be using a custom compiled kernel. I didn't spot any
> explanation of that (-stable patches? changes to kernel config?).
> Non-GENERIC kernels make developers nervous.
Nothing custom; it's 4.7 stable with patches 001 through 006 applied,
which required r
Para ver este correo por favor utilice un cliente de correo moderno
Il giorno ven, 01/10/2010 alle 18.15 -0400, Daniel Browning-Weber ha
scritto:
> Is the use of both "route-to" and "divert-packet" in the same PF rule
> supported?
divert-packet should be currently used alone. It sends the packet up to
userspace and any other options are lost.
* YayD1ndaki tChttp://www.turku-radyo.com/>
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 10:46:59PM -0600, Devin Reade wrote:
> I've got a problem where I have a couple of OpenBSD firewalls
> running in a redundant configuration using carp, and have found
> that CentOS 5.5 (Linux) boxes running on a protected network, if
> they have avahi-daemon running, will
Please file a bugreport, including all details. A tcpdump of the packages sent
and received can help in finding where the bug is.
-Otto
Op 3 okt. 2010 om 09:54 heeft Alexander Polakov het
volgende geschreven:
> 2010/10/3, Otto Moerbeek :
>> Does this also happen with udp mounts?
>
> Yes, it d
Off topic, was "he" looking for 4.8 release:
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=532_1285949897
2010/10/3, Otto Moerbeek :
> Does this also happen with udp mounts?
Yes, it does.
--
Alexander Polakov | plhk.ru
CbrCB6mmel CB)rtesCB-tCB
31 matches
Mail list logo
