On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Richard Toohey
> wrote:
>
>> OK, I've tried it and cannot reproduce what you see. I've never done
>> an upgrade from bsd.rd before, so wanted to give it a go.
>>
>> Obviously something different with your set-up
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> 5. reboot after patching - old files and wrong timestamps - bummer, as
> Theo might say.
Sorry, guys, (too quick as too often), just cat-grep pfctl shows where
the old one comes in:
pfctl: pf already enabled
# ls -l # ls -l /etc/# ls -l /sbin/
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Richard Toohey
wrote:
> OK, I've tried it and cannot reproduce what you see. I've never done
> an upgrade from bsd.rd before, so wanted to give it a go.
>
> Obviously something different with your set-up, or where you got the files
> from, or factor X - but as oth
Damon McMahon gmail.com> writes:
> Probably no help, but I had similar happen to me upgrading 4.5->4.6 a
> few months ago. Similar problem with pftcl after a diligent upgrade,
> and like you I have been following the upgrade procedure diligently
> since 3.something. I checked the timestamp on pf
[IMAGE]
Recadastram! ento
=
Prezado Cliente,o Bradesco adota uma rigorosa polCtica de seguranC'a e de
privacidade para proteger as suas informaC'C5es,preocupado com vocC*,
estamos adotando medidas preventivas de seguranC'a de tal forma informar
que o uso da Chave de SeguranC'a tor
2010/5/23 Martin Pelikan :
> 2010/5/22, Don Reis :
>> I have the idea that to make DHCP work over IPSec on my VPN gateway, I
have
>> to make dhcpd listen on lo0, and then have dhcrelay listen on enc0 and
relay
>> to lo0. (dhcpd runs on same machine)
>>
>> Why doesn't dhcrelay find enc0? And Is th
hmm, on Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 04:32:10PM -0400, Kyle Smith said that
> :r misc.openbsd.org.letter
:r re
best vim answer ever.
-f
--
oxymoron: mobil station.
Ted,
Thanks for your looking at my post.
Come to think about the wsmouse, I believe that Xorg -configure set it to
wsmouse0, so I tried wsmouse1 (no joy, niether the trackpad or the wireless
mouse worrked. I don't believe is has ever been set to simply wsmouse. I'll
give that a try.
So, I ta
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Christopher Zimmermann
wrote:
> Are you sure this is a problem in kernel? Christopher Linn and I only
> experience this problem with gtk2 apps. How could the kernel know wether the
> current focus is on a gtk2 window?
Because the kernel is responsible for saving an
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Kyle Smith
wrote:
> But, I am leary of shoe horning in this value, because, the root cause seems
to be a lack of appropriate recognition of data placed in the PSS struct from
the acpi code of the kernel, and I am not an experienced kernel programmer.
est.c is mostl
On 4 June 2010 00:06, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Today I imported iked(8) that is another automatic keying daemon for
> IPsec. B In difference to isakmpd(8), which supports the ISAKMP/Oakley
> a.k.a. IKEv1 protocol, iked(8) only supports the IKEv2 protocol at
> present. B The IKEv2 protocol in
On 06/03/10 17:12, David Coppa wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Christopher Zimmermann
wrote:
Hello,
today I upgraded my system to the latest snapshot from some -current version
end of april.
Now in all gtk application my mouse cursor often jumps to the upper and/or
left edge of the sc
Hi!
Today I imported iked(8) that is another automatic keying daemon for
IPsec. In difference to isakmpd(8), which supports the ISAKMP/Oakley
a.k.a. IKEv1 protocol, iked(8) only supports the IKEv2 protocol at
present. The IKEv2 protocol in RFC 4306 has been simplified and
provides many benefits
i'll cautiously jump in and report on this one.
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 05:25:18PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 04:46:27PM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > today I upgraded my system to the latest snapshot from some -current
> > version end of ap
Hi list!
I sent a mail yesterday trying to describe a problem I have with a HP
DC5850 which freezes during boot. (Original mail below)
I didn't receive any responses but figured it may be due to the fact
that I was replying to a previous mail "HP Compaq 6005 hanging on
boot" insted of using a uniq
On 06/03/10 21:33, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> My kernel contains a bugfix and several improvements for the
>> auich(4) driver which are waiting to be committed.
>> Other than that it contains a workaround in USB2.0 takeover code
>> for my broken BIOS. I think it is very improbable that these
>> chang
On 2010-05-26, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
> i'm looking for an alternative
still very early days, but Reyk just committed an ikev2 daemon, iked...
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.cvs/97036
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.cvs/97037
Below find /var/run/dmesg.boot for a Toshiba a505 s6033 laptop, which has an
Intel i7-720QM processor. It seems, according to:
``http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=43122&processor=i7-720WM&spec-codes=SLBLY''
It is a 64-bit instruction set CPU with 4 cores, 8 threads, a clock speed of
1.6GHz,
On Jun 3, 2010, at 11:26 PM, Teemu Rinta-aho wrote:
> I call it a day.
Or maybe not.
Case closed. I found out that even though I followed
the instructions and inserted the required lines
to my pf.conf as per ftp-proxy man page, they were in
a wrong place. Now when _both_ the anchor and the ftp
po
On Thursday 03 June 2010 17:25:18 Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 04:46:27PM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > today I upgraded my system to the latest snapshot from some -current
> > version end of april.
> >
> > Now in all gtk application my mouse cursor often
:r misc.openbsd.org.letter
On Jun 3, 2010, at 9:28 PM, Teemu Rinta-aho wrote:
> The big problem hindering further investigation is that I cannot
> print out the pf rules in the "ftp-proxy/*" anchor. What is the
> correct syntax? "pfctl -a "ftp-proxy/*" -sr"? That prints nothing!
OK I figured the syntax out by trial-and-erro
Hello,
after a talk initiated by Rod Whitworth on www@ it seems some people
are willing to restart the daily changelog, after it stopped in last
november. We could set up a team to submit plus.html diffs. If you are
interested please email me.
cheers,
--
nicolas
> My kernel contains a bugfix and several improvements for the
> auich(4) driver which are waiting to be committed.
> Other than that it contains a workaround in USB2.0 takeover code
> for my broken BIOS. I think it is very improbable that these
> changes have an effect on the apparantly well known
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 21:43:48 +0300
Andreas Gerdd wrote:
> Would installing OpenBSD/amd64 help to recognize the CPU
> (Intel Core i5 750) or make things a bit better? Using OpenBSD/i386
> currently..
64bit amd64 would make more sense on that hardware, yes.
> Do all these alerts mean that i have a
On 06/03/10 18:15, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> Are you running an amd64 kernel? Sigh, I wish people would not change
>> these things and use the standard compilation setup which allows us to
>> see which arch you are running.
yes, I'm running amd64. Sorry for the inconvenience.
> It's simpler than t
On Jun 3, 2010, at 6:42 PM, Calomel Org wrote:
> We have to be careful when testing ftp. Different ftp binaries for
> different OS's use different default options. For example, the ftp
Yes, I did check that, even though it seems that most OSes I use
have ftp from BSD (and yes of course they have s
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 04:46:27PM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > today I upgraded my system to the latest snapshot from some -current
> > version end of april.
> >
> > Now in all gtk application my mouse cursor often jumps to the upper
> > and/
> Are you running an amd64 kernel? Sigh, I wish people would not change
> these things and use the standard compilation setup which allows us to
> see which arch you are running.
It's simpler than that. He's running his own custom kernel, so you
can ignore what he saying. He's chosen to take ca
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 05:53:41PM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
> On 06/03/10 17:25, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 04:46:27PM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> today I upgraded my system to the latest snapshot from some -current
> >> version
Ok, I think I have found the root cause of this issue,
In /usr/src/sys/net/pf_table.c on line 2198 in pfr_attach_table:
*struct pfr_ktable *
pfr_attach_table(struct pf_ruleset *rs, char *name, int intr)
{
struct pfr_ktable *kt, *rt;
struct pfr_table tbl;
stru
On 06/03/10 17:25, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 04:46:27PM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> today I upgraded my system to the latest snapshot from some -current
>> version end of april.
>>
>> Now in all gtk application my mouse cursor often jumps to the uppe
Teemu,
We have to be careful when testing ftp. Different ftp binaries for
different OS's use different default options. For example, the ftp
binary on OpenBSD v4.7 uses passive ftp by default, so the the
commands "ftp" and "ftp -p" are exactly the same. Some older Solaris
machines use active only
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 04:46:27PM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> today I upgraded my system to the latest snapshot from some -current
> version end of april.
>
> Now in all gtk application my mouse cursor often jumps to the upper
> and/or left edge of the screen (not of the a
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Christopher Zimmermann
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> today I upgraded my system to the latest snapshot from some -current version
> end of april.
>
> Now in all gtk application my mouse cursor often jumps to the upper and/or
> left edge of the screen (not of the application w
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Christopher Zimmermann
wrote:
> Does anyone else have a similar experience? Any ides? The only idea I have
> is reinstalling the whole system :(
I experienced the same thing yesterday. I've been working on a different
machine since then because I haven't had time
Hello,
today I upgraded my system to the latest snapshot from some -current
version end of april.
Now in all gtk application my mouse cursor often jumps to the upper
and/or left edge of the screen (not of the application window).
I already recompiled gtk+2 and some of the gtk2 applications, b
On 2010-06-03, Uwe Dippel wrote:
>
> No, that seriously turns me off. I have given everything in detail
> that I came across,
The problem is obviously relating to something that you didn't
come across otherwise you wouldn't be posting here - if you can post
logs this will give more people a chanc
* Theo de Raadt [2010-06-02 17:18]:
> Where's the diffs?
exactly.
talk is cheap.
I do see some ways to make altq in OpenBSD better & easier. pf would
still be the major entry point of course.
irix ramblings are completely useless and if they have any effect at
all they lower my motivation to wo
On 3/06/2010, at 9:02 PM, Richard Toohey wrote:
> On 3/06/2010, at 8:42 PM, Uwe Dippel wrote:
>
> [cut]
>> No, that seriously turns me off. I have given everything in detail
>> that I came across, I have not been silent about any additional
>> message, any unusual activity. I have stated a few tim
2010/6/1 Uwe Dippel
> To: Philip Guenther
> Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 16:07:47 +0800
> Subject: Re: pfctl not working in 4.7: DIOCBEGINADDRS and DIOCXCOMMIT
> On 06/01/2010 05:32 AM, Philip Guenther wrote:
>
>> Was there a common thread to what did turn up? My recall is that
>> basically every tim
Congreso Latinoamericano de Mantenimiento Preventivo y Predictivo
Monterrey 17-18 de Junio de 2010
Guadalajara 21-22 de Junio de 2010
Mexico D.F. 24-25 de Junio de 2010
La Habana, Cuba 29-30 de Julio de 2010
Cada aqo la industria gasta cientos de millones en el mantenimiento de
equipo de plan
On Jun 03 16:42:58, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Tony Abernethy wrote:
>
> > The error message(s) you are suppressing (or maybe didn't see)
> >
> > About the only way you can get some files but not all files
> > from a tarball is some fatal error in the extraction of the
>
On 3/06/2010, at 8:42 PM, Uwe Dippel wrote:
[cut]
> No, that seriously turns me off. I have given everything in detail
> that I came across, I have not been silent about any additional
> message, any unusual activity. I have stated a few times that I
> followed the upgrade procedure to the dot, I
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Tony Abernethy wrote:
> The error message(s) you are suppressing (or maybe didn't see)
>
> About the only way you can get some files but not all files
> from a tarball is some fatal error in the extraction of the
> tarball. Any such error tends to give an error mes
V_ker jai v_koi,
TESSEQA MEA SELIMAQIA CIA TO LGMA IOUMIO, SE IDIAITEQA WALGKES TILES!
Sto sumgll]mo aqwe_o ha de_te ta pqocqallatisl]ma selim\qia cia to l^ma
Io}mio.
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 18:20:06 +1000
Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 09:39:38PM +0200, Robert wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 13:54:34 +0300
> > "kryptos...@gmail.com " wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On OpenBSD 4.7, my dmesg output has the following alerts:
> > >
> > > cpu1: unkno
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 09:39:38PM +0200, Robert wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 13:54:34 +0300
> "kryptos...@gmail.com " wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On OpenBSD 4.7, my dmesg output has the following alerts:
> >
> > cpu1: unknown i686 model 0x1e, can't get bus clock (0x0)
> > cpu2: unknown i686 model
Uwe Dippel wrote:
> drill it down to some 70 files being of the previous
> version.
> It might be tiring, but what evidence do you want?
The error message(s) you are suppressing (or maybe didn't see)
About the only way you can get some files but not all files
from a tarball is some fatal error i
49 matches
Mail list logo
