Congreso Premier: Desarrollo Integral de Asistentes Ejecutivas,12 de Marzo 2010 México D.F.

2010-02-24 Thread Lic. Rosa Baumgarten
Congreso Premier Desarrollo Integral de Habilidades para Asistentes Ejecutivas InnovaciC3n, Productividad y ProyecciC3n 12 de Marzo de 2010 MC)xico D.F. PMS de MC)xico le presenta este exclusivo seminario, cualquier empresario o directivo de una compaC1Ca sabe el valor que tiene el trabajo de una

managing routes for multiple PPPoE connections

2010-02-24 Thread Edwin Eyan Moragas
hi misc, this is a follow up on the post i made regarding multiple PPPoE connections. from the manpage of pppoe(4), a default route is added using the pppoe connection: !/sbin/route add default -ifp pppoe0 0.0.0.1 i have no idea how to manage the routes when a connection goes down. is a simple

Estratto Conto - Ref.24Gen-24Feb

2010-02-24 Thread BCC
Gentile Cliente, da questo momento h disponibile on-line l'estratto conto mensile riferito al codice del rapporto 20010-440199234: potr` consultarlo, stamparlo e salvarlo sul suo PC per creare un suo archivio personalizzato. Le ricordiamo che ogni estratto conto rimane in linea fino al terzo mese

Re: Relaying with multiple accounts in OpenSMTPD

2010-02-24 Thread Josh Rickmar
On Wed, February 24, 2010 7:48 pm, Gilles Chehade wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 07:29:42PM -0500, Josh Rickmar wrote: >> I'm currently trying to replace msmtp with smtpd in my mutt >> configuration. I have it relaying >> messages through my email provider, but only for one of my accounts. >> (Cu

Re: OpenBGPD Multicast SAFI Support?

2010-02-24 Thread Michael H Lambert
On 24 Feb 2010, at 17:24, Claudio Jeker wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 04:19:33PM -0500, Michael H Lambert wrote: >> If I'm reading the manpages and latest CVS correctly, OpenBGPD does not yet >> support SAFI_MULTICAST for either IPv4 or IPv6, although some of the hooks >> appear to be present.

Re: Relaying with multiple accounts in OpenSMTPD

2010-02-24 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 07:29:42PM -0500, Josh Rickmar wrote: > I'm currently trying to replace msmtp with smtpd in my mutt configuration. I > have it relaying > messages through my email provider, but only for one of my accounts. > (Currenly I am using 'for > all' in my smtpd.conf.) Is there

panic: rlphy_service: attempt to isolate phy

2010-02-24 Thread Alexander Nasonov
OpenBSD 4.6 panics on my 4 core amd64 HP workstation when I do ifconfig -a. I'm unable to type anything in ddb prompt because the workstation has only USB, video, audio and ethernet outputs (it's a slim model). However, I can use the keyboard in initial ddb prompt when I boot with -d option. It

Latin Professionals needed for exclusive network, invitation inside

2010-02-24 Thread Emerald Executive Group
I am pleased to inform you that today February 22, 2010, Emerald Who's Who for Executives and Professionals has selected you as potential candidate into our organization to represent Mexico and the latin professional community. Emerald is the authority for professional networking and recognition in

Relaying with multiple accounts in OpenSMTPD

2010-02-24 Thread Josh Rickmar
I'm currently trying to replace msmtp with smtpd in my mutt configuration. I have it relaying messages through my email provider, but only for one of my accounts. (Currenly I am using 'for all' in my smtpd.conf.) Is there a way to filter based on the From header? After looking through smtpd

Re: .../i386/SHA256 not sorted?

2010-02-24 Thread Jan Stary
On Feb 24 23:22:20, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2010-02-24, Jan Stary wrote: > > My snapshot downloading script just complained > > that there is a difference between i386/SHA256 > > and the result of running > > > > cat index.txt | grep -Fv SHA256 | xargs cksum -a sha256 > > ouch. try 'cksum -

Re: is the Lemote Yeeloong available in the US?

2010-02-24 Thread Miod Vallat
Sorry to hijack that thread while it is getting old... It seems that it is easier for people in northern America (but maybe USA only) to get Gdium Liberty netbooks, rather than Lemote Yeeloong netbooks. The OpenBSD/loongson port runs on the Gdium about as badly as on the Yeeloong - which basicall

Re: .../i386/SHA256 not sorted?

2010-02-24 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2010-02-24, Jan Stary wrote: > My snapshot downloading script just complained > that there is a difference between i386/SHA256 > and the result of running > > cat index.txt | grep -Fv SHA256 | xargs cksum -a sha256 ouch. try 'cksum -c SHA256'...

kern.maxclusters: 6144 -> ?

2010-02-24 Thread Pete Vickers
Hi, A proxy (squid) server running i368/4.6RELEASE with around 800 users, what would be a reasonable value to increase kern.maxclusters too, to cure this : r...@proxy-s ~> grep mcl /var/log/messages Dec 10 10:13:43 proxy-s /bsd: WARNING: mclpools limit reached; increase kern.maxclusters Dec 1

Re: OpenBGPD Multicast SAFI Support?

2010-02-24 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 04:19:33PM -0500, Michael H Lambert wrote: > If I'm reading the manpages and latest CVS correctly, OpenBGPD does not yet > support SAFI_MULTICAST for either IPv4 or IPv6, although some of the hooks > appear to be present. Does anyone have a good feel for how much effort wou

.../i386/SHA256 not sorted?

2010-02-24 Thread Jan Stary
My snapshot downloading script just complained that there is a difference between i386/SHA256 and the result of running cat index.txt | grep -Fv SHA256 | xargs cksum -a sha256 in the i386 directory. The difference is exactly this: 16a17 > SHA256 (install47.iso) = > 7105afbd45e11072347ce43bcae9

OpenBGPD Multicast SAFI Support?

2010-02-24 Thread Michael H Lambert
If I'm reading the manpages and latest CVS correctly, OpenBGPD does not yet support SAFI_MULTICAST for either IPv4 or IPv6, although some of the hooks appear to be present. Does anyone have a good feel for how much effort would be required to add this functionality (or just where changes need to b

Re: include sys/cdefs.h in sys/mmap.h

2010-02-24 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Christopher Zimmermann wrote on Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 08:53:28PM +0100: > I just got some errors while trying to compile ptlib: > > error: type specifier omitted for parameter `size_t' > [...] > > They resulted from size_t not being defined in sys/mmap.h > I could fix this problem by including sy

Re: OpenBSD insecure OS?

2010-02-24 Thread Brad Tilley
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:36 +, "carlos albino garcia grijalba" wrote: > Folks i dont mean obsd is insecure i love obsd, ive been using it for 5 > years > i just want the community to read the history > sorry. OpenBSD doesn't have the rubber stamps. That's what confuses people. However, it has

Need advice re: Wistron CM9 and Net 4501

2010-02-24 Thread daniel
I'm running 4.6 (release, I think) on a Soekris Net 4501. See dmesg, below. I recently got a Wistron CM9 (ath) mini-pci card for it (I've been running, wired-only, for 4-5 years). I'm getting a couple different error messages while attempting to use it. I initially thought (hoped) that the problem

include sys/cdefs.h in sys/mmap.h

2010-02-24 Thread Christopher Zimmermann
Hi! I just got some errors while trying to compile ptlib: error: type specifier omitted for parameter `size_t' [...] They resulted from size_t not being defined in sys/mmap.h I could fix this problem by including sys/types.h instead of sys/cdefs.h in sys/mmap.h Is this a problem of ptlib, which

Re: OpenBSD insecure OS?

2010-02-24 Thread carlos albino garcia grijalba
Folks i dont mean obsd is insecure i love obsd, ive been using it for 5 years i just want the community to read the history sorry. > Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:20:03 -0700 > From: dwchand...@stilyagin.com > To: genesi...@hotmail.com > CC: misc@openbsd.org > Subject: Re: OpenBSD insecure OS? > > On

Re: OpenBSD insecure OS?

2010-02-24 Thread Henry Sieff
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 11:02 AM, carlos albino garcia grijalba wrote: > I foud this: > http://allthatiswrong.wordpress.com/2010/01/20/the-insecurity-of-openbsd/ > > so ? trolling trolling trolling:: http://trolling.trolling.troll/troll/troll/troll/trolling-trolls-of-trollovia/ troll? hth gf

Re: OpenBSD insecure OS?

2010-02-24 Thread Bryan
On 2/24/2010 1:02 PM, carlos albino garcia grijalba wrote: I foud this: http://allthatiswrong.wordpress.com/2010/01/20/the-insecurity-of-openbsd/ so ? _ Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsofts powerful SPAM protection. https://sign

Re: OpenBSD insecure OS?

2010-02-24 Thread Darrin Chandler
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 07:02:15PM +, carlos albino garcia grijalba wrote: > I foud this: > http://allthatiswrong.wordpress.com/2010/01/20/the-insecurity-of-openbsd/ > > so ? http://marc.info/?t=12641295802&r=1&w=2 So. -- Darrin Chandler| Phoenix BSD User Group | MetaBUG

Re: OpenBSD insecure OS?

2010-02-24 Thread Dunceor
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 8:02 PM, carlos albino garcia grijalba wrote: > I foud this: > http://allthatiswrong.wordpress.com/2010/01/20/the-insecurity-of-openbsd/ > > so ? Old, move along. http://www.mail-archive.com/misc@openbsd.org/msg86163.html

Re: OpenBSD insecure OS?

2010-02-24 Thread Thomas Pfaff
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:02:15 + carlos albino garcia grijalba wrote: > I foud this: > http://allthatiswrong.wordpress.com/2010/01/20/the-insecurity-of-openbsd/ > > so ? > Gah, not again. Search the archives (http://marc.info).

Re: OpenBSD insecure OS?

2010-02-24 Thread richardtoohey
Quoting carlos albino garcia grijalba : > I foud this: > http://allthatiswrong.wordpress.com/2010/01/20/the-insecurity-of-openbsd/ > > so ? > > _ > Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsofts powerful SPAM protection. > https://signup.

Re: OpenBSD insecure OS?

2010-02-24 Thread Michiel van Baak
On 19:02, Wed 24 Feb 10, carlos albino garcia grijalba wrote: > I foud this: > http://allthatiswrong.wordpress.com/2010/01/20/the-insecurity-of-openbsd/ > > so ? Search the archives, and move along. -- Michiel van Baak mich...@vanbaak.eu http://michiel.vanbaak.eu GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:1

Re: OpenBSD insecure OS?

2010-02-24 Thread J Sisson
http://old.nabble.com/The-insecurity-of-OpenBSD-td27268082.html

Re: OpenBSD insecure OS?

2010-02-24 Thread Marco Peereboom
retarded On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 07:02:15PM +, carlos albino garcia grijalba wrote: > I foud this: > http://allthatiswrong.wordpress.com/2010/01/20/the-insecurity-of-openbsd/ > > so ? > > _ > Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft

OpenBSD insecure OS?

2010-02-24 Thread carlos albino garcia grijalba
I foud this: http://allthatiswrong.wordpress.com/2010/01/20/the-insecurity-of-openbsd/ so ? _ Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsofts powerful SPAM protection. https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969

Re: Core dumps from daemon processes?

2010-02-24 Thread Rogier Krieger
Would the following be an improvement for the documentation? Feel free to flame my mdoc(7) skills or lack thereof. Regards, Rogier ### Eclipse Workspace Patch 1.0 #P man5 Index: core.5 === RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man5/core.5,v

Opportunità di Lavoro nel mondo della vendita diretta

2010-02-24 Thread Opportunitaguadagno.com Newsletter
Para visualizar esta mensagem, use um programa de e-mail compativel com html!

Re: dumpdates

2010-02-24 Thread Dan Harnett
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 07:00:44PM +0100, Didier Wiroth wrote: > Hello, > I would like to backup the /etc directory, like this: > sudo dump -0uan -f - /etc | gzip -9 | ssh -i .ssh/id_rsa_host2 m...@host2 dd > of=/home/me/dump-files/dump-etc-l0-`date +%d%m%Y`.gz > > a) Is it normal that /etc/dumpd

Re: softdeps enabled = poor "concurrent" access?

2010-02-24 Thread Noah McNallie
On 02/24/2010 07:41 AM, Artur Grabowski wrote: On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:20 AM, Noah McNallie wrote: Well, i've found on openbsd without sofdeps enabled it will do this just fine. But when enabling softdeps it will not. The 'uname' or 'ls' will take quite a while to complete. Simplified expl

Re: softdeps enabled = poor "concurrent" access?

2010-02-24 Thread J Sisson
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Noah McNallie wrote: > it is very fast for single process tasks, but when another process would > like to use the disk it seems to just let one hog everything I do believe that's Artur's response explained earlier.

Re: softdeps enabled = poor "concurrent" access?

2010-02-24 Thread Tony Abernethy
Noah McNallie wrote: > please read latest post Doesn't get any lazier than that.

Re: softdeps enabled = poor "concurrent" access?

2010-02-24 Thread Noah McNallie
On 02/24/2010 04:52 AM, Jan Stary wrote: On Feb 23 19:20:28, Noah McNallie wrote: Hey guys. Noah here. I'd like to use openbsd on an older machine i have. I've had it on there before and never tested something that i've been testing on various operating systems lately. That's how well they do wh

Re: softdeps enabled = poor "concurrent" access?

2010-02-24 Thread Noah McNallie
On 02/24/2010 05:10 AM, Tobias Ulmer wrote: On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:52:05AM +0100, Jan Stary wrote: On Feb 23 19:20:28, Noah McNallie wrote: Hey guys. Noah here. I'd like to use openbsd on an older machine i have. I've had it on there before and never tested something that i've been testing

dumpdates

2010-02-24 Thread Didier Wiroth
Hello, I would like to backup the /etc directory, like this: sudo dump -0uan -f - /etc | gzip -9 | ssh -i .ssh/id_rsa_host2 m...@host2 dd of=/home/me/dump-files/dump-etc-l0-`date +%d%m%Y`.gz a) Is it normal that /etc/dumpdates is empty after the backup? b) What do I have to modify to add the info

Re: Dell R610 problems with Openbsd?

2010-02-24 Thread Theo de Raadt
> > I run them with multi 10Gb adapters and over 16TB of storage as my lab > > infrastructure box. Compiles pretty darn nicely, yay 16 cores ;-) > > Hey Marco, what 10G NICs are you using? One of the 10G cards I am using is: ppb3 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 "PLX PEX 8648" rev 0xbb pci4 at ppb3 bus

4.6 openssh and ldap or radius

2010-02-24 Thread Markus
Hi all, i try to authenticate at my sshd using login_-ldap and login_radius both are not working with sshd only if i do a dry run on the commandline the login is passed. In the debug run of radius and the slapd i figured out that the sshd is passing the username ==> "NOUSER" to the login progs!! D

Лишний вес-не проблема.

2010-02-24 Thread Виктория
J`fd{i hg m`q hleer qbni qnaqrbemm{i bgckd m` beq h rekn. Dk mejnrnp{u qknbn "onkm{i" - qhmnmhl qhk{ h ak`cnonkswh. Dk dpschu "onkm{i" ngm`w`er nrqsrqrbhe jnmrpnk m`d qnani, ophb{wjs j q`lnnop`bd`mh~ h aeqonlnymne p`gbedemhe psj`lh. Dk rper|hu "onkm{i" - }rn oknune m`qrpnemhe h rnqj`. Dk

Re: pfctl table cleared time is jumping around

2010-02-24 Thread Henning Brauer
* Dan Harnett [2010-02-24 15:29]: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 08:30:05AM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote: > > * Dan Harnett [2010-02-23 21:19]: > > > > > > Probably wrong, but this fixes it. > > > > i would not call that wrong. > > > > i don't understand how this ever worked and I don't understand w

Re: Dell R610 problems with Openbsd?

2010-02-24 Thread Diana Eichert
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010, Marco Peereboom wrote: Intel copper running ix. I can send you a dmesg if you want. Yeah, that would be great. I'll look around and see if I can borrow one or two from one of my co-contractors. thanks

Re: pfctl table cleared time is jumping around

2010-02-24 Thread Dan Harnett
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 08:30:05AM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote: > * Dan Harnett [2010-02-23 21:19]: > > > > Probably wrong, but this fixes it. > > i would not call that wrong. > > i don't understand how this ever worked and I don't understand what > broke it. the only commit in that timeframe t

Re: load balancing PPPoE connections

2010-02-24 Thread Steven Surdock
> -Original Message- > From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of > Stuart Henderson > Subject: Re: load balancing PPPoE connections > > On 2010/02/24 09:37, Edwin Eyan Moragas wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:58 AM, Stuart Henderson > wrote: ... > > >>

Re: Dell R610 problems with Openbsd?

2010-02-24 Thread Kapetanakis Giannis
On 24/02/10 15:27, Marco Peereboom wrote: Intel copper running ix. I can send you a dmesg if you want. I would be interested on that dmesg as well.

Re: Dell R610 problems with Openbsd?

2010-02-24 Thread Marco Peereboom
Intel copper running ix. I can send you a dmesg if you want. On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 06:16:31AM -0700, Diana Eichert wrote: > On Tue, 23 Feb 2010, Marco Peereboom wrote: > >> I run them with multi 10Gb adapters and over 16TB of storage as my lab >> infrastructure box. Compiles pretty darn nicely

Re: Dell R610 problems with Openbsd?

2010-02-24 Thread Diana Eichert
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010, Marco Peereboom wrote: I run them with multi 10Gb adapters and over 16TB of storage as my lab infrastructure box. Compiles pretty darn nicely, yay 16 cores ;-) Hey Marco, what 10G NICs are you using? diana

i want to write to u, dear

2010-02-24 Thread Juli S
Hi, gentleman! Ill let you go to the whims of fate... If I were to kiss your luscious lips and drink of them their wine I will love you more and ask you to be mine. If you were to hold me in your arms and rock me off to sleep, I will lay there all night long. I'll say that "I am yours to keep.

Re: softdeps enabled = poor "concurrent" access?

2010-02-24 Thread Artur Grabowski
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:20 AM, Noah McNallie wrote: > Well, i've found on openbsd without sofdeps enabled it will do this just > fine. But when enabling softdeps it will not. The 'uname' or 'ls' will take > quite a while to complete. Simplified explaination. Without softdeps, your tar does one

Re: softdeps enabled = poor "concurrent" access?

2010-02-24 Thread Marco Peereboom
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:59:12AM +0100, Bret S. Lambert wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:52:05AM +0100, Jan Stary wrote: > > On Feb 23 19:20:28, Noah McNallie wrote: > > > Hey guys. Noah here. I'd like to use openbsd on an older machine i have. > > > I've had it on there before and never tes

Re: softdeps enabled = poor "concurrent" access?

2010-02-24 Thread Michal
On 24/02/2010 09:52, Jan Stary wrote: > On Feb 23 19:20:28, Noah McNallie wrote: >> Hey guys. Noah here. I'd like to use openbsd on an older machine i have. >> I've had it on there before and never tested something that i've been >> testing on various operating systems lately. That's how well t

Re: softdeps enabled = poor "concurrent" access?

2010-02-24 Thread Tobias Ulmer
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:52:05AM +0100, Jan Stary wrote: > On Feb 23 19:20:28, Noah McNallie wrote: > > Hey guys. Noah here. I'd like to use openbsd on an older machine i have. > > I've had it on there before and never tested something that i've been > > testing on various operating systems l

Re: softdeps enabled = poor "concurrent" access?

2010-02-24 Thread Bret S. Lambert
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:52:05AM +0100, Jan Stary wrote: > On Feb 23 19:20:28, Noah McNallie wrote: > > Hey guys. Noah here. I'd like to use openbsd on an older machine i have. > > I've had it on there before and never tested something that i've been > > testing on various operating systems l

Re: Slow IO in PowerEdge R200 X3330 2.66Ghz 2x3MB Cache.

2010-02-24 Thread Tomas Bodzar
I think, that someone told to you that you must use current ;-) Anyway here you can find something about AHCI and SATA http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_ATA If you don't have option to turn AHCI on in your BIOS then you may have problems. If you will read this http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.

Re: softdeps enabled = poor "concurrent" access?

2010-02-24 Thread Jan Stary
On Feb 23 19:20:28, Noah McNallie wrote: > Hey guys. Noah here. I'd like to use openbsd on an older machine i have. > I've had it on there before and never tested something that i've been > testing on various operating systems lately. That's how well they do > while under disk io load, concur

Re: Dell R610 problems with Openbsd?

2010-02-24 Thread Shailesh Tyagi
Hi Theo, You guys are doing a fantastic work!! Have never used and experienced such a optimized OS in my life. Really really great job.. I would like to donate a new Dell R210 with Xeon X3450 @ 2.67GHz/ 8GB RAM. Let me know the shipping address. W/Regards, Shailesh Tyagi | CEO Direct | 1 646

Re: softdeps enabled = poor "concurrent" access?

2010-02-24 Thread Tomas Bodzar
BTW this is great paper about SoftUpdates and journaling http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/usenix2000/general/full_papers/seltzer/seltzer_html/index.html which I found as link in old interview with Theo http://kerneltrap.org/node/6 I know now more about meta-data and similar st

Re: Core dumps from daemon processes?

2010-02-24 Thread Anthony Howe
On 23/02/2010 23:30, Stuart Henderson whispered from the shadows...: > kern.nosuidcoredump=2 works fine for me in -current (though =0 seems > broken), so please try with a newer OS version. This should work, it's > needed for debugging Xorg too. OK. I can confirm your results, see below for the ve