On Thursday 04 February 2010 01:44:15 Ted Unangst wrote:
> I haven't really solved the problem I want to solve, but was able to whip
> this up pretty quickly. Basically, it's just a wrapper that runs a
> command and then starves it from running. disknice is a misnomer, it also
> gets starved from
I haven't really solved the problem I want to solve, but was able to whip
this up pretty quickly. Basically, it's just a wrapper that runs a
command and then starves it from running. disknice is a misnomer, it also
gets starved from cpu, but at the current time the only way to slow down a
pro
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 09:48:29PM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 18:45:13 -0700 (MST) Diana Eichert
> wrote:
>
> > Really, I meant, Where would Carmen San Diego find a
> > Lemote Yeeloong in the US?
> >
> > diana
> >
>
> I was wondering when Loongson based systems would star
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 18:45:13 -0700 (MST) Diana Eichert
wrote:
> Really, I meant, Where would Carmen San Diego find a
> Lemote Yeeloong in the US?
>
> diana
>
I was wondering when Loongson based systems would start showing up, but
the following was a wonderful surprise:
http://www.lemot
Hello,
While you're likely a troll, you may just be some sad religious zealot
ranting on a mailing list.
If you're not fond of vi(1), you may be interested in mg(1).. while it's
not exactly the same as pico or nano, it's not that far off.
Keep it off the lists next time,
-Bryan.
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Scott McEachern wrote:
> Giridhari wrote:
>
> blah blah
>>
>> pico or nano
>
> blah blah
>>
>> part of the distribution.
>
> and more blah blah blah.
>
> All that because you find 'pkg_add pico" or "pkg_add nano" too difficult to
> type?
>
> --
>
> -RSM
>
> http://
OpenBSD apache 1.3 != apache 1.3
What is wrong with apache in base?
And if you don't like it what is wrong with apache 2 in ports?
Or any other web server in ports for that matter.
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 07:21:03PM -0800, David wrote:
> Given the above, is openbsd going to stick with Apache 1.
Jacob Meuser wrote:
>> Absolutely right. Kernel doesn't see USB drive from that point because
>> USB is not 2.0 as advertised but it is 1.1. Crapy hardware. Seems that
>> uhci doesn't pick up from ehci during the boot process.
> did you ty disabling echi in UKC?
No, I didn't try. I will try tom
Given the above, is openbsd going to stick with Apache 1.3?
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 08:48:35PM -0500, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> Absolutely right. Kernel doesn't see USB drive from that point because
> USB is not 2.0 as advertised but it is 1.1. Crapy hardware. Seems that
> uhci doesn't pick up from ehci during the boot process.
did you ty disabling ech
Giridhari wrote:
Hare Krsna.
From: Giridhari
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 7:37 AM
To: dera...@cvs.openbsd.org ; dera...@openbsd.org
Subject: Fw: pico and/or nano in the releases and snapshots
ATTENTION
Last night I saved a rat from certain death at the hands of a cat whose
ovaries had b
On Wed, Feb 04, 2010 at 1:01:38AM Jacob Meuser wrote:
>>On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 01:06:15PM -0500, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
>> This is the brief preliminary report on Wyse C90LE. I downloaded
>> yesterday the latest snapshot of OpenBSD 4.7 beta for i386.
>>
>> I installed on 2.0 USB of 2GB.
>> I t
Really, I meant, Where would Carmen San Diego find a
Lemote Yeeloong in the US?
diana
If you are smart enough to write support for umodem for the MF626, then
learning vi should be a breeze.
Alternatively:
If learning vi is so hard for you, then you havn't a hope in hell of
writing
support for umodem for the MF626.
paulm
On 4/02/2010, at 12:52 PM, Giridhari wrote:
Hare Krsn
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 07:06:49PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> Wow this easily is the best troll of the year so far.
really? to me it looks like someone was trying to be funny and totally
failed. I give it a two thumbs down.
--
jake...@sdf.lonestar.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http:
Wow this easily is the best troll of the year so far.
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 10:52:32AM +1100, Giridhari wrote:
> Hare Krsna.
>
>
> From: Giridhari
> Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 7:37 AM
> To: dera...@cvs.openbsd.org ; dera...@openbsd.org
> Subject: Fw: pico and/or nano in the releases and
I've been avoiding this OP, but I guess I'll weigh in now.
This smells like roe. Don't feed it.
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 01:54:07AM +0100, Jesus Sanchez wrote:
> El 04/02/2010 0:52, Giridhari escribis:
> >Hare Krsna.
> >
> >
> >From: Giridhari
> >Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 7:37 AM
> >To: d
He's not asking you to do it, it is all up to the LordKrsna in this
case.
Mehma
===
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Scott McEachern wrote:
> Giridhari wrote:
>
> blah blah
>
>> pico or nano
>>
> blah blah
>
>> part of the distribution.
>>
> and more blah blah blah.
>
> All that because you
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 01:06:15PM -0500, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> This is the brief preliminary report on Wyse C90LE. I downloaded
> yesterday the latest snapshot of OpenBSD 4.7 beta for i386.
>
> I installed on 2.0 USB of 2GB.
>
> I tested the live USB by booting DeLL optiplex 960 (Intel 2 c
El 04/02/2010 0:52, Giridhari escribis:
Hare Krsna.
From: Giridhari
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 7:37 AM
To: dera...@cvs.openbsd.org ; dera...@openbsd.org
Subject: Fw: pico and/or nano in the releases and snapshots
ATTENTION
Last night I saved a rat from certain death at the hands of a
Giridhari wrote:
blah blah
pico or nano
blah blah
part of the distribution.
and more blah blah blah.
All that because you find 'pkg_add pico" or "pkg_add nano" too difficult
to type?
--
-RSM
http://www.erratic.ca
Hare Krsna.
From: Giridhari
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 7:37 AM
To: dera...@cvs.openbsd.org ; dera...@openbsd.org
Subject: Fw: pico and/or nano in the releases and snapshots
ATTENTION
Last night I saved a rat from certain death at the hands of a cat whose
ovaries had been cut out. This i
2010/2/3 Jean-Francois :
> Not clear for me, does this firewall reach EAL4+ or EAL6 as stated in their
> doc
"Certified by the BSI according to CC at the level EAL 4+"
http://www.genua.de/genua/kunden/index.en.html
Best
Martin
Le mardi 02 fivrier 2010 20:29:29, Martin Schrvder a icrit :
> 2010/2/2 Keith :
> > Can anyone help me out ?
>
> If you need professional services:
> http://www.genua.de/produkte/firewall/genugate/index.en.html
>
> Their firewalls are OpenBSD based.
>
> Best
> Martin
>
Not clear for me, does t
I'm trying to confirm that spamd is syncing the db properly between 2
hosts. When I startup spamd I get:
listening for incoming connections.
in /var/log/spamd; but nothing else. There is a lot of UDP traffic on 8025
between the 2 hosts but the databases are still different sizes.
I'm starting
I booted one more time specifying bsd.sp kernel explicitly. Right
before I am asked to explicitly enter the root device. I see the
following repeating four times
ehci_sync_hs:tsleep()=35
Predrag
Para Desuscribirse, por favor, haga click aquí :
http://mailing.marketing-ip.com.ar/box.php?funcml=unsub2&nl=502&mi=10216&email=misc%40openbsd.org
This is the brief preliminary report on Wyse C90LE. I downloaded
yesterday the latest snapshot of OpenBSD 4.7 beta for i386.
I installed on 2.0 USB of 2GB.
I tested the live USB by booting DeLL optiplex 960 (Intel 2 core).
Everything works perfect including X server.
Conclusion is that USB med
If you have trouble seeing this mail, click here.
Top Shop
Top E-revija: 45, 3. februar 2010.
Najbolja praktiD
na reE!enja i saveti za bolji E>ivot
PoD
etna | Budi fit! | Lepota | Zdrav E>ivot
DomaDinstvo | Zabava i deca | Quelle katalog | Knjige
Top Shop
HIT TV proizvodi!
2xSweet Dream Pil
hi
no , there is no weighting, but you can use the monitoring feature
with an own script that messure the load of the box .
if the load going over a limit the script give an exit 1
and relayd diden4t send traffic to this host.
holger
> Hi list,
>
> I'm planning to replace a GNU/Linux-driven lo
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 07:00:56AM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 13:57:09 + Owain Ainsworth
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 07:42:57AM +0200, Jussi Peltola wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 04:54:49AM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 05:57
* nixlists [2010-01-14 08:39]:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Henning Brauer
> wrote:
> > * nixlists [2010-01-14 03:21]:
> >> > test results on old P4 are unfortunately pretty much pointless.
> >>
> >> Why?
> >>
> >> cpu0: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.53GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 2.52
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 13:57:09 + Owain Ainsworth
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 07:42:57AM +0200, Jussi Peltola wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 04:54:49AM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 05:57:11AM +0200, Jussi Peltola wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 02:35:54
Hi list,
I'm planning to replace a GNU/Linux-driven load balancer (heartbeat,
ldirectord) by an OpenBSD setup using pf, pfsync, and relayd.
However, I discovered that I need 'weighting' (at least that is what it's
called in ldirectord).
For example, I have ten web servers to spread the load on
Late last week I submitted PR 6302. This morning I had it take down two more
machines, within minutes of each other. The hardware in this case was
completely different: One box is a 32bit Intel with em(4); the other is an
amd64 with nfe(4).
Has anyone else run into this?
--
bda
cyberpunk is dead.
I am trying to get ldattach and gpsd to work together, and I'm having
issues. I have 3 USB GPS devices, and at least one seems to work with
gpsd when not using ldattach (I haven't tested the others yet).
When I run ldattach I get the following:
# ldattach -d -p nmea /dev/cuaU0
/dev/ttyp2
ldattach[2
Robert Gilaard wrote:
> max-src-conn-rate 2/30 implies 1 in 15 seconds
No, it does not!
Helmut
--
No Swen today, my love has gone away
My mailbox stands for lorn, a symbol of the dawn
Eugene Yunak wrote:
2010/2/2 Keith :
organisations WAN. Our security people are asking if the firewall that we
use is accreditated by ITSEC and I am pretty sure it isn't but it turns out
that our security people will be happy is the firewall is accredited for use
by another government !
Ukrain
2010/2/2 Keith :
> I've used OpenBSD & PF for a number of years without issue and am now in the
> position that I want to create a dmz between the Internet and my
> organisations WAN. Our security people are asking if the firewall that we
> use is accreditated by ITSEC and I am pretty sure it isn't
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 02:15:00PM -0500, Brad Tilley wrote:
> Common Criteria - http://www.iso15408.net
[...]
> I think the certification process can be very narrowly focused on a
> few parts of the system
[...]
Yup, that's the whole idea behind CC - all the evaluation does is verify
the claims t
Ola,
Estco abertas candidaturas para casting na tua cidade!
Nco percas esta oportunidade unica de poder fazer parte do mundo da moda,
televisco e cinema.
Verifica as varias oportunidades abertas neste momento em,
http://www.estilus.eu/promo/index.php?em=wqw&email=bWlzY0BvcGVuYnNkLm9yZw==
Obrig
Ola,
Estco abertas candidaturas para casting na tua cidade!
Nco percas esta oportunidade unica de poder fazer parte do mundo da moda,
televisco e cinema.
Verifica as varias oportunidades abertas neste momento em,
http://www.estilus.eu/promo/index.php?em=wqw&email=bWlzY0BvcGVuYnNkLm9yZw==
Obrig
On 03/02/2010, at 8:49 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2010-02-01, Keith wrote:
>> I've used OpenBSD & PF for a number of years without issue and am now in
>> the position that I want to create a dmz between the Internet and my
>> organisations WAN. Our security people are asking if the firewa
On 2010-02-01, Keith wrote:
> I've used OpenBSD & PF for a number of years without issue and am now in
> the position that I want to create a dmz between the Internet and my
> organisations WAN. Our security people are asking if the firewall that
> we use is accreditated by ITSEC and I am prett
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 10:35:33 +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 03:02:16PM +1100, Rod Whitworth wrote:
>> I sometimes see a bgpd message in /var/log/messages saying:
>> /bsd: cannot forward from :: to 2zzz:z000::0005 nxt 17 received on vr2
>> (I snipped the datestamp and hostname
On 2010-02-03, Adriaan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Jean-Francois wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am looking for a way to easily identify the various names given by OpenBSD
>> to the disks before install, in order to be able to correctly make the slides
>> and mount points during an instal
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 03:02:16PM +1100, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> I sometimes see a bgpd message in /var/log/messages saying:
> /bsd: cannot forward from :: to 2zzz:z000::0005 nxt 17 received on vr2
> (I snipped the datestamp and hostname to stop linewrap)
>
> It is not common and nothing bad seem
> Given such limitations, perhaps you might propose a more
> open evaluation and make code access for audit, including by escrow
> access for an established third-party authority, as a major criteria?
To simplify things, I have just certified the 4.6/i386 GENERIC
that runs my router as "The Best
48 matches
Mail list logo
