Re: pppd

2009-08-27 Thread Philip Guenther
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 6:59 PM, 4625<4625...@gmail.com> wrote: > pppd: PPP device not available. > > Why? Hmm, I don't see that message in pppd on an OpenBSD 4.6 system. Or rather, I only see it in the source as the beginning of a much longer message that describes what your next steps should be

Re: Funny T22 Freezes with 4.5

2009-08-27 Thread Nick Holland
Johan SANCHEZ wrote: > Hi list, > I m experiencing random freezes with few T22 fairly old laptops. > I know those have crazy bios with few bugs. > I tried a jump at UKC then disabled the acpi with no effect. > I disabled the power mangement for cpu and pci bus with no more > luke. I think you are

pppd

2009-08-27 Thread 4625
pppd: PPP device not available. Why? -- 4625

Re: tmux status bar

2009-08-27 Thread Daniel Bolgheroni
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Nicholas Marriott wrote: > This is probably because the behaviour changed a while ago so "reverse" is no > longer in the default status-attr and message-attr, so this now sets the > colours to black on black. > > Change these it should be fine (I guess you want green on black

Re: /dev in mfs permissions

2009-08-27 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009-08-27, Lars Nooden wrote: > I'm running OpenBSD 4.6-current (GENERIC) #125: Tue Aug 25 06:13:48 MDT > 2009 on an i386 and notice that mfs seems different than earlier > versions. What have I missed in mounting /dev ram using MFS? > > From /etc/fstab: > /dev/wd0a / ffs ro 1 1 > swa

Re: SFTP - Max Users

2009-08-27 Thread Todd T. Fries
Not sure what unix you're running, over here, uid_t is 32bit. Penned by Robert on 20090827 20:52.31, we have: | On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:23:18 -0400 | "Morris, Roy" wrote: | | > G'day, | > I searched around but couldn't find a simple answer to this | > question

Re: SFTP - Max Users

2009-08-27 Thread Robert
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:43:34 -0400 Brynet wrote: > Robert wrote: > > Number of local user accounts is liminted by the available user > > id's. Since that's a 16 bit limit and if you stick to the 'from uid > > 1000 up' rule, that'd leave you with 64536 possible accounts. > > Hi, > > Thats wrong

Re: [pf question] Positive condition for adding in the table?

2009-08-27 Thread Ivan Radovanovic
Iqigo Ortiz de Urbina napisa: You could also take a look at the match, tag and tagged keywords in pf.conf. Additionally, you may require parsing your custom logs (pflogN interfaces or binary logs in /var/log/) in order to populate your tables for use in the main ruleset or anchors. Have a n

Sendmail and SMTPAuth

2009-08-27 Thread stupidmail4me
I know this topic has been touched on before but I have what I believe is a simple question. Instead of creating a SASL password db and having to keep two password databases in check I want SASL to use OpenBSD's password file. There's no definitive answer so I want to try and put it out there.

Re: /dev in mfs permissions

2009-08-27 Thread Philip Guenther
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Lars Nooden wrote: > I'm running OpenBSD 4.6-current (GENERIC) #125: Tue Aug 25 06:13:48 MDT > 2009 on an i386 and notice that mfs seems different than earlier > versions. What have I missed in mounting /dev ram using MFS? ... > $ cat /etc/fstab > cat: stdout: Bad

Re: SFTP - Max Users

2009-08-27 Thread Brynet
Robert wrote: > Number of local user accounts is liminted by the available user id's. > Since that's a 16 bit limit and if you stick to the 'from uid 1000 up' > rule, that'd leave you with 64536 possible accounts. Hi, Thats wrong, uid_t and gid_t are 32-bit unsigned integers on at least i386. .

Re: encryption

2009-08-27 Thread Brad Tilley
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 3:35 PM, pu wrote: > Unless I misunderstood, you seem to imply that using a mainframe means you > *need* to use weak encryption. That's wrong. Yes, you misunderstand. Financial institutions use DES today because of backward compatibility. They've been using DES for roughly

Re: Softraid crypto - stable in 4.6?

2009-08-27 Thread Robert
Those limitations are ok. You said it "isn't a good idea"; is there a possibility for data loss or will it just be slow & an ugly hack? So what would currently (4.6) be a sane way to have an encrypted disk mirrored? (no hardware raid, except if someone gives me the hardware for free...) * r

rwho protocol and bridging

2009-08-27 Thread stan
I have 2 4.5 machine functioning as a bridge between 2 physical locations. I have teh 4.6. rwhod daemon running on both. I'm running the 4.6 version because it appears that teh 4.5 version is a listner only. All teh macines at both ends (Linux FreeBSD, HP-UX and OpenBSD) are all running rwhod. Y

Re: SFTP - Max Users

2009-08-27 Thread Morris, Roy
excellent thanks. -Original Message- From: Robert [mailto:rob...@openbsd.pap.st] Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 2:53 PM To: Morris, Roy Cc: misc@openbsd.org Subject: Re: SFTP - Max Users On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:23:18 -0400 "Morris, Roy" wrote: > G'day, > I searched around but couldn't f

Re: Fully Automatic (network-based) Installation of OpenBSD?

2009-08-27 Thread Toni Mueller
Thank you both, Miod and Soeren - I think I was actually after the link Soeren posted, but didn't think that it was that long ago already. -- Kind regards, --Toni++

Re: encryption

2009-08-27 Thread pu
Brad Tilley wrote: On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 2:22 PM, pu wrote: Brad Tilley wrote: They still have mainframes. Sure. And mainframes have very good encryption [snip] Yes, my point exactly. Those mainframes *still* support plain, old DES. Read the link you sent. Unless I misunderstood, you se

/dev in mfs permissions

2009-08-27 Thread Lars Nooden
I'm running OpenBSD 4.6-current (GENERIC) #125: Tue Aug 25 06:13:48 MDT 2009 on an i386 and notice that mfs seems different than earlier versions. What have I missed in mounting /dev ram using MFS? >From /etc/fstab: /dev/wd0a / ffs ro 1 1 swap /dev mfs rw,-P=/templates/dev.base,-s=3000,-i

maybe OT 5 year anniversay of Chuck Yerkes death

2009-08-27 Thread Diana Eichert
I don't think it's off topic but others might. I'm writing this post to remember Chuck Yerkes, a long time contributor to the m...@openbsd list. Chuck died 5 years ago today while riding his motorcycle. http://web.archive.org/web/20041012235249/http://www.contracostatimes.com/mld/cctimes/news/951

Re: encryption

2009-08-27 Thread Brad Tilley
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 2:22 PM, pu wrote: > Brad Tilley wrote: >> >> They still have mainframes. > > Sure. And mainframes have very good encryption [snip] Yes, my point exactly. Those mainframes *still* support plain, old DES. Read the link you sent.

JenJOBS.com - Where Employers & Jobseekers Win

2009-08-27 Thread JenJOBS.com
img file Please add customerserv...@jenjobs.net to your address book to ensure job alerts and updates are sent directly to your Inbox! JenJOBS.com Logo Dear Friend, Whether you are an employer with a vacancy to advertise or a job seeker looking for your first or next job, JenJOBS.com can help!

Re: SFTP - Max Users

2009-08-27 Thread Robert
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:23:18 -0400 "Morris, Roy" wrote: > G'day, > I searched around but couldn't find a simple answer to this > question. I want to host a sftp server and there could be > thousands of accounts, although not all used at once. I was > wondering if there is a limit to the number of

Re: encryption

2009-08-27 Thread pu
Brad Tilley wrote: They still have mainframes. Sure. And mainframes have very good encryption, see for example http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/WP100810 -pu

Re: Softraid crypto - stable in 4.6?

2009-08-27 Thread Marco Peereboom
As long as you can deal with the limitations then it is fine. The really big one being unable to change the password. Stacking RAID sets can be done but isn't a good idea. We are debating options but no decision has been made. On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 01:59:58PM +0200, Robert wrote: > I read som

Re: Fully Automatic (network-based) Installation of OpenBSD?

2009-08-27 Thread Soeren Aurehoej
Hi Toni Is it this one you are thinking of ? http://nbender.com/install.netboot/install.html Kind regards Sxren Aurehxj Den 27/08/2009 kl. 17.53 skrev Toni Mueller: Hi, I dimly remember seeing a short thread flowing by that mentions someone's hacks to bsd.rd to arrive at an installation sy

Re: mail issue

2009-08-27 Thread Stuart VanZee
> From: John Cosimano > Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 1:41 PM > To: Openbsd Misc (E-mail) > Subject: Re: mail issue > > > --- Stuart VanZee [Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:55:39AM -0400]: --- > > I am using OpenBSD 4.5 > > > > When I try to use mail to send email from a user account I > > get an error:

Re: mail issue

2009-08-27 Thread John Cosimano
--- Stuart VanZee [Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:55:39AM -0400]: --- > I am using OpenBSD 4.5 > > When I try to use mail to send email from a user account I > get an error: > > can not chdir(/var/spool/mqueue/): Permission denied > Program mode requires special privileges, e.g., root or TrustedUser.

Re: a dump question

2009-08-27 Thread stan
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:15:50PM -0400, stan wrote: > I am still fiighting with Amanda on 4.5 It seems to invoke dump as follows: > > /sbin/dump dump 0usf 1048576 - /dev/rwd0a > > Which reesults in the follwing error: > > $ /sbin/dump dump 0usf 1048576 - /dev/rwd0a | cat > /tmp/foo > dump: de

SFTP - Max Users

2009-08-27 Thread Morris, Roy
G'day, I searched around but couldn't find a simple answer to this question. I want to host a sftp server and there could be thousands of accounts, although not all used at once. I was wondering if there is a limit to the number of user accounts I can create on a machine? I had originally thought o

mail issue

2009-08-27 Thread Stuart VanZee
I am using OpenBSD 4.5 When I try to use mail to send email from a user account I get an error: can not chdir(/var/spool/mqueue/): Permission denied Program mode requires special privileges, e.g., root or TrustedUser. Searching for this, I have found in various places many different explanations

listserver test

2009-08-27 Thread stan
Sorry for the noise. My messages don't seem to be getting to the list. -- One of the main causes of the fall of the roman empire was that, lacking zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C programs.

Re: tmux status bar

2009-08-27 Thread Daniel Bolgheroni
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Han Boetes wrote: > Daniel Bolgheroni wrote: > > just noticed the status bar of tmux gone with the latest > > snapshot. I didn't followed the cvs entries for a couple of > > days. Is this a normal behaviour? > > Works fine here. Are you sure you ran "make depend all" or "make

Re: tmux status bar

2009-08-27 Thread Nicholas Marriott
Hi On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:00:54AM +, Daniel Bolgheroni wrote: > Hi misc@, > > just noticed the status bar of tmux gone with the latest snapshot. I > didn't followed the cvs entries for a couple of days. Is this a normal > behaviour? My .tmux.conf is below: > > --.tmux.conf-- > set-opti

Funny T22 Freezes with 4.5

2009-08-27 Thread Johan SANCHEZ
Hi list, I m experiencing random freezes with few T22 fairly old laptops. I know those have crazy bios with few bugs. I tried a jump at UKC then disabled the acpi with no effect. I disabled the power mangement for cpu and pci bus with no more luke. I ve been amused to discover at last boot the lapt

a dump question

2009-08-27 Thread stan
I am still fiighting with Amanda on 4.5 It seems to invoke dump as follows: /sbin/dump dump 0usf 1048576 - /dev/rwd0a Which reesults in the follwing error: $ /sbin/dump dump 0usf 1048576 - /dev/rwd0a | cat > /tmp/foo dump: density is invalid [10 - 327670] As I understand this invocation from r

Revista D Agosto - No te pierdas la nueva forma en info-entretenimiento social. Solo da click en la portada

2009-08-27 Thread Revista D- Agosto09
Su servicio de correo no permite lectura de Html por favor visite http://www.revistad.com.mx/06/ para ver el contenido de este mensaje. [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of edi06-RD.jpg]

Re: Fully Automatic (network-based) Installation of OpenBSD?

2009-08-27 Thread Miod Vallat
> I dimly remember seeing a short thread flowing by that mentions > someone's hacks to bsd.rd to arrive at an installation system that > works w/o human intervention, but can't seem to find it anymore. > > Pointers are greatly appreciated! I think you are referring to YAIFO. Miod

Re: Automated service/daemon management

2009-08-27 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Tue, 09.06.2009 at 15:52:55 -0400, Bryan Allen wrote: > My suggestion would be to move all your services to run under runit or > daemontools. You can manage both with Puppet. I'm not familiar with runit, > really, but I've used daemontools for years, quite happily, on several > platforms,

Fully Automatic (network-based) Installation of OpenBSD?

2009-08-27 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, I dimly remember seeing a short thread flowing by that mentions someone's hacks to bsd.rd to arrive at an installation system that works w/o human intervention, but can't seem to find it anymore. Pointers are greatly appreciated! -- Kind regards, --Toni++

Re: tmux status bar

2009-08-27 Thread Han Boetes
Daniel Bolgheroni wrote: > just noticed the status bar of tmux gone with the latest > snapshot. I didn't followed the cvs entries for a couple of > days. Is this a normal behaviour? Works fine here. Are you sure you ran "make depend all" or "make clean all"? Otherwises changes in tmux.h won't prop

Re: Authentication method fallback not working

2009-08-27 Thread Schöberle Dániel
> Hi, > > I'm using OpenBSD 4.5-stable, and I'm trying to configure RADIUS > authentication. What I want is for the system to try the > RADIUS server, > and if it fails, fall back to the local password file. In > login.conf I have > > auth-defaults:auth=radius,passwd:radius-server=my.radius.serve

tmux status bar

2009-08-27 Thread Daniel Bolgheroni
Hi misc@, just noticed the status bar of tmux gone with the latest snapshot. I didn't followed the cvs entries for a couple of days. Is this a normal behaviour? My .tmux.conf is below: --.tmux.conf-- set-option -g status-bg default set-option -g status-fg black set-option -g message-bg yellow s

Re: [pf question] Positive condition for adding in the table?

2009-08-27 Thread Ivan Radovanovic
Girish Venkatachalam napisa: On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Ivan Radovanovic wrote: Thanks for your respone. If I understand you correctly pf kernel module actually supports operating with tables based on positive conditions (ie not only when rule is broken, but also when rule is true), and

Re: [pf question] Positive condition for adding in the table?

2009-08-27 Thread Girish Venkatachalam
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Ivan Radovanovic wrote: > Thanks for your respone. If I understand you correctly pf kernel module > actually supports operating with tables based on positive conditions (ie not > only when rule is broken, but also when rule is true), and the way to define > rules of

Softraid crypto - stable in 4.6?

2009-08-27 Thread Robert
I read somewhere [1] on misc@ that softraid-crypto is still considered experimental. Can one of developers confirm that in 4.6 it will be safe to use it in production? Actually I would like to use crypto on top of RAID 1 (both softraid) - good/bad idea? (before anyone asks: backups are in pla

Re: [pf question] Positive condition for adding in the table?

2009-08-27 Thread Ivan Radovanovic
Girish Venkatachalam napisa: Please read up on pf(4) anchors. And also on connection overloads in pf.conf(5). Stuff like max-conn-rate and so on. You already said you know about pf(4) tables. You need to populate the tables based on different criteria. I know that connection overload is one.

Re: [pf question] Positive condition for adding in the table?

2009-08-27 Thread Girish Venkatachalam
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Ivan Radovanovic wrote: > I am new into pf configuration and I am curious if it is possible to add > some host into table in firewall rules if some conditions are met (not > if they are broken). I was thinking about some way to prevent port > scanning of machine and

[pf question] Positive condition for adding in the table?

2009-08-27 Thread Ivan Radovanovic
I am new into pf configuration and I am curious if it is possible to add some host into table in firewall rules if some conditions are met (not if they are broken). I was thinking about some way to prevent port scanning of machine and what came to me as obvious way to do it is this (in some pseudo

Re: encryption

2009-08-27 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009-08-27, My List Mail wrote: > I use vnconfig for encryption, which uses Blowfish. softraid(4) crypto uses AES.

Re: bgpd q

2009-08-27 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 01:00:05PM +0300, Gregory Edigarov wrote: > Hi, > > Could I rewrite as-paths in bgpd? I.e. if I have an incoming as-path > like this: > > 1 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 > > and would like for some reason to rewrite it like: 1 2 3 4, or > 1 2 3 3 4, can I do this? > No. You're