no it is not a garbage.. It's just zero filled disk. Geometry detection
process uses info from preexisting partition table?
And the zero fill included the MBR making it garbage.
so we must prepare MBR with 3rd party tools before OpenBSD installation?
How to understand in installation time which geometry is "correct" for
curent disk? What is the starting point for calculations? Number of sectors?
In which case, if you want to set it right, your best bet is to say
'No' to letting OpenBSD use the whole disk, then setting the correct
geometry by
On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:26:30 +0600, Sergey Yudin wrote:
>no it is not a garbage.. It's just zero filled disk. Geometry detection
>process uses info from preexisting partition table?
>
And the zero fill included the MBR making it garbage.
*** NOTE *** Please DO NOT CC me. I subscribed to the lis
Please can someone tell why disk geometry changed after install
in installation time on empty sd0:
Disk: sd0 geometry: 78753/2/911 [143638992 Sectors]
Offset: 0 Signature: 0x0
Starting Ending LBA Info:
#: id C H S - C H S [ start:
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 11:03:20AM +0600, Sergey Yudin wrote:
> Please can someone tell why disk geometry changed after install
>
> in installation time on empty sd0:
>
> Disk: sd0 geometry: 78753/2/911 [143638992 Sectors]
> Offset: 0 Signature: 0x0
>Starting Ending
Sergey Yudin wrote:
>
> Please can someone tell why disk geometry changed after install
>
> in installation time on empty sd0:
>
> Disk: sd0 geometry: 78753/2/911 [143638992 Sectors]
I don't know what that is, or where it came from,
but I don't think any 80386-type pc-BIOS could handle tha
Please can someone tell why disk geometry changed after install
in installation time on empty sd0:
Disk: sd0 geometry: 78753/2/911 [143638992 Sectors]
Offset: 0 Signature: 0x0
Starting Ending LBA Info:
#: id C H S - C H S [ start:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 05:56:43AM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Pascal Lalonde [2009-06-12 00:28]:
> > Jun 11 18:08:19 celeborn /bsd: pf: state key linking mismatch! dir=OUT,
> > if=bge0, stored af=2, a0: 10.136.192.199:30285, a1: 10.216.8.1:22,
> > proto=6, found af=2, a0: AAA.AAA.AAA.AAA, a1
hmm, on Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 08:08:45PM +0200, Henning Brauer said that
> * frantisek holop [2009-06-30 18:47]:
> > now that set require-order is disabled by default,
> > is there a practical use for it?
> > isn't it now a 'useless knob'?
>
> it will be very much useless soon, and then I'll enjoy
* frantisek holop [2009-06-30 18:47]:
> now that set require-order is disabled by default,
> is there a practical use for it?
> isn't it now a 'useless knob'?
it will be very much useless soon, and then I'll enjoy removing it.
removing your own work is nice, isn't it? :)
revision 1.176
date: 20
hi there,
i was wondering if it is a good idea to put actual hosts
into man pages as examples as in:
EXT_IF = "fxp0"
MAILHOSTS = "{129.128.11.10, 129.128.11.43}"
pass in log on $EXT_IF inet proto tcp to $MAILHOSTS \
port smtp
pass out
hi there,
now that set require-order is disabled by default,
is there a practical use for it?
isn't it now a 'useless knob'?
-f
--
friends are people you can be quiet with.
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 11:15 +0200, u...@o3si.de wrote:
> Is it possible to load balance / failover the traffic over IPSec? If
> so,
> should I use GIF for load balancing / routing?
That's what Cisco DMVPN is, as far as I can tell. Was just reading
about it.
You're talking about GRE tunnels to tw
Here is an output of pppd debugging
(if someone can help ... because this is chinese to me ;-((
Jun 30 18:26:55 406334g pppd[31216]: Serial connection established.
Jun 30 18:26:56 406334g pppd[31216]: Using interface ppp0
Jun 30 18:26:56 406334g pppd[31216]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/cuaU0
Jun 30 1
STeve Andre' wrote:
I just found out that my ppp link via my T-Mobile
phone doesn't work. Of course I found this out while
being outside without any other net connection.
I haven't changed anything other than compiling
stuff. This is a -current system on a Thinkpad W500
compiled on June
Hi @misc,
maybe someone can give me some hints ;-)
I try to use an OpenBSD firewall with two ADSL links connected (dynamic
addresses!) to the internet. Now I want to establish two IPSec tunnels over
each link to a central VPN gateway (OpenBSD too).
Is it possible to load balance / failover the t
A few more details on this issue, after some further experimentation.
The Caps Lock key always works fine at the console; the problem I
reported only affects X.
My computer has a single USB keyboard (there are no PS/2 ports).
If I use "disable pckbd", then the keyboard continues to work fine at
17 matches
Mail list logo
