ALISADO DEFINITIVO
ATENCION EXCLUSIVA A PELUQUERIAS Y ESPECIALISTAS
[IMAGE]
Seguramente conociste diversos productos, entre ellos los caseros y
peligrosos...
Una vez mas estamos a la vanguardia!!!
Estudiamos los componentes de las mejores y mas conocidas formulas del
Mercado Nacional e Interna
Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote:
Seven years old, but the abstract looks nice:
http://cisr.nps.navy.mil/pubabstracts/02abstract_smith.html
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type APPLICATION/DEFANGED which had a
name of eagirard.13040DEFANGED-vcf]
gave this a read and expect that some devs m
> is there an easy way to make a complete and full transcript of
> an upgrade or install using bsd.rd without a serial console?
No.
The abstract contains the words mccabe cyclomatic complexity. That's
where I stopped reading.
On Jun 28, 2009, at 7:21 AM, Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote:
Seven years old, but the abstract looks nice:
http://cisr.nps.navy.mil/pubabstracts/02abstract_smith.html
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment o
hi there,
is there an easy way to make a complete and full transcript of
an upgrade or install using bsd.rd without a serial console?
might come handy for bug reports and also archiving the choices
one made at install time.
script(1) is only about 10k but i doubt it might make onto
the install m
Hi Dan, thanks for the pointer
Custom rules are the equivalent of having your head spin through a
tumble-dryer ... but they work:
SLocal_check_rcpt
# check if sender is in local domains
# if yes, accept
# if not, recipient has to be local, else reject
R$* $: $1 $| $>3 $&f
R$*
Hi Dan, thanks for the pointer
Custom rules are the equivalent of having your head spin through a
tumble-dryer ... but they work:
SLocal_check_rcpt
# check if sender is in local domains
# if yes, accept
# if not, recipient has to be local, else reject
R$* $: $1 $| $>3 $&f
R$*
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 07:19:48 -0400
Okan Demirmen wrote:
> On Mon 2009.06.15 at 11:46 +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> > This is 4.5-stable.
> >
> > In cwm, I use the C-M-f feature to toggle the
> > full-screen size of a window (mostly xterms). That works. However,
> > if I maximize a window with C-M-f,
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 04:01:00PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> You can try fsck -fn. It even works on mounted filesystems. It won't fix
> any issues, but it might tell you if there are any.
>
> Just kill all processes save sshd, wait a bit, call sync(8) a couple of
> times, and run it.
I don
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 02:15:43PM +0100, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:08:47AM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> > > I'm looking for /forcefsck equivalent. I just wanted to be sure that
> > > after reading all manuals there is really no such option to mark fs as
> > > unclea
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 03:21:16PM +0200, 'the other machine' wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Running OpenBSD 4.5 on a vm I receive the error 'administrative
> prohibition' when passing smtp traffic from another machine through
> pf.
>
> This only occurs with one provider but it does not occur with that
> same
Seven years old, but the abstract looks nice:
http://cisr.nps.navy.mil/pubabstracts/02abstract_smith.html
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type APPLICATION/DEFANGED which had a
name of eagirard.13040DEFANGED-vcf]
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:08:47AM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> > I'm looking for /forcefsck equivalent. I just wanted to be sure that
> > after reading all manuals there is really no such option to mark fs as
> > unclean.
>
> That is not really an answer; what *are* you really truing to do? T
Hello!
Running OpenBSD 4.5 on a vm I receive the error 'administrative
prohibition' when passing smtp traffic from another machine through
pf.
This only occurs with one provider but it does not occur with that
same provider if emails are not passed through pf but instead sent
directly.
So, obvi
I have a look at this. The ppp code is a total nightmare.
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 02:17:13PM +0200, Oliver Klima wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after the latest change in ppp(8)/iface.c ppp(8) will loop endlessly if
> there's an interface with ifm_version != RTM_VERSION. The pointer to the
> if_msghdr structur
Hi,
after the latest change in ppp(8)/iface.c ppp(8) will loop endlessly if
there's an interface with ifm_version != RTM_VERSION. The pointer to the
if_msghdr structure doesn't point to the next element when continue is
executed.
In addition the inner loop checks the ifm_version a second time,
al
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 05:53:09PM +0300, What you get is Not what you see
wrote:
> Hi
> I have installed OpenBSD 4.5 on a machine and try to use NFS exports
> on it. But the performance is very bad.
> I have another machine with 4.1 on it whose NFS performance is
> awesome. I did the same config
Not sure why you would ever want to force a check. If there are problems on
boot i've never seen OBSD not fix them. I've had servers hit power cuts 3-5
times a day for a week and OBSD hasn't had a problem with it. Some of they
are still running now. I'd be suprised if forcing a check found anything
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 12:22:31AM +0100, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 12:11:31AM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 08:37:44PM +0100, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> > > Is it possible?
> >
> > There is no /forcefsck mechanism for OpenBSD as there is for L
19 matches
Mail list logo
