I don't have a floppy drive in laptop.
I just use command " fixmbr " in windows xp rescue console mode, then boot
from the OpenBSD 4.5 install CD, and run "fdisk -e /dev/rwd0c" in shell,
then "flag " the OpenBSD partition bootable. but boot failed, "ERR M"
2009/5/9 Steve Williams
> Feifei (??) w
Feifei (??) wrote:
Hi, Nick,
Thanks for you advices,
I clear Grub from my MBR, and flag the OpenBSD partition bootable , but I
also got a "ERR M" error code.
Yes, I read "man biosboot", but I don't know how to resolve it.
I try to reinstall OpenBSD 4.5 again , but it is the same error :(.
2009/
Hi, Nick,
Thanks for you advices,
I clear Grub from my MBR, and flag the OpenBSD partition bootable , but I
also got a "ERR M" error code.
Yes, I read "man biosboot", but I don't know how to resolve it.
I try to reinstall OpenBSD 4.5 again , but it is the same error :(.
2009/5/7 Nick Holland
>
Hi,
Thanks for hints, it was helpfull and i have just created an encrypted
raid volume succesfully.
Well, could you please advise me how i can automate to run bioctl
*before* fstab entires mounted? --- so that i can push ie; /var, /usr
and swap partitions into encrypted volume?
Thanks in a
On Fri, 08 May 2009 17:41:08 -0400
Dan wrote:
> Today after I executed a stop on apache the machine crashed and
> generated a /var/crash with:
> 2.0Kbounds
> 6.5Mbsd.0
> 2.0Kbsd.0.core
> 2.0Kminfree
>
>
> I have been searching and have not found a site in regards to debug
> this
> Today after I executed a stop on apache the machine crashed and generated a
> /var/crash with:
> 2.0Kbounds
> 6.5Mbsd.0
> 2.0Kbsd.0.core
> 2.0Kminfree
man savecore
Vivek Ayer writes:
> But of course, to keep it relevant, OpenBSD will run on the router and
> will use hoststated http://home.nuug.no/~peter/riga2008/relayd.html. I
> guess it's been renamed. I haven't paid attention. The book of PF uses
> hoststated, so I guess it's already kind of obsolete.
ye
Today after I executed a stop on apache the machine crashed and generated a
/var/crash with:
2.0Kbounds
6.5Mbsd.0
2.0Kbsd.0.core
2.0Kminfree
I have been searching and have not found a site in regards to debug this on
OpenBSD. Could somebody shed some light?
Thank you.
Daniel
+1 for friday laughs.
(private) HKS wrote:
> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Bob Beck wrote:
>
http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2009/04/15/ibotnet-trojan.html
>> It's a *botnet* guys, installed by *trojan* i.e. by tricking the stupid
>>
> idiot
>
>> at the keyboar
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 12:17 PM, (private) HKS wrote:
> Wait, so you're saying OpenBSD can't even protect me from myself?
>
> Also I left my laptop running OpenBSD on a table at Starbucks while I
> went to the bathroom and when I came back it was gone!
>
> So much for secure by default...
That's
On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 05:06 -0500, Robson Caetano wrote:
> Hi
>
> I would like to log From:, To: and Subject: fields of
> every SMTP connection to my internal SMTP server
> that is passed by the openbsd firewall.
>
You're better off doing that within your MTA. Courier has a Big Brother
feature:
Thanks for the tip. I was looking at the all the options and
FreeBSD/Xen looks like the best bet as far as resource throttling
goes.
Install ROCKS on the nodes, install Xen on ROCKS, install FreeBSD as
domU and give it domU a lot of priority. I'll give it a shot and
publish my findings in the futu
Well, that's because you didn't get the pro version which comes with
locks and cables.
On 5/8/09, (private) HKS wrote:
> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Bob Beck wrote:
>>> > http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2009/04/15/ibotnet-trojan.html
>>
>> It's a *botnet* guys, installed by *trojan* i.e.
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Bob Beck wrote:
>> > http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2009/04/15/ibotnet-trojan.html
>
> It's a *botnet* guys, installed by *trojan* i.e. by tricking the stupid
idiot
> at the keyboard into doing something retarded. The OS can be the most
> secure thing on the p
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Uwe Werler [2009-05-07 16:43]:
Hello list,
I have an OpenBSD box with 4.5 connected to two carriers, to one per dhcp and
to the other static configured.
Now I tried to change my rule set from route-to/reply-to syntax to rtable usage.
Up to now I added my static config
> > http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2009/04/15/ibotnet-trojan.html
It's a *botnet* guys, installed by *trojan* i.e. by tricking the stupid idiot
at the keyboard into doing something retarded. The OS can be the most
secure thing on the planet and if the person at the keyboard is stupid
you'll
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 11:34:44AM +0100, Chris Harries wrote:
> This here problem of downloading a dodgy copy of Photoshop which opens
> you up for a BotNet is something that can effect all OS's.but is that
> completely true? Can the same thing happen to an OpenBSD machine and
> is there no way ar
Hi Michael,
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Michael wrote:
>
> Salvatore Sciacco schrieb:
> > I've also modified some sysctl params but without success:
> > net.inet.tcp.recvspace=262144
> > net.inet.tcp.sendspace=262144
> > net.inet.udp.recvspace=262144
> > net.inet.udp.sendspace=262144
> >
> >
Hi,
Salvatore Sciacco schrieb:
> I've also modified some sysctl params but without success:
> net.inet.tcp.recvspace=262144
> net.inet.tcp.sendspace=262144
> net.inet.udp.recvspace=262144
> net.inet.udp.sendspace=262144
>
> Anyone have some suggestion?
I've got the same issue, but by increasing
I checkout the newest for azalia, now anything is okay,
my dmesg is:
OpenBSD 4.5 (GENERIC.MP) #1: Fri May 8 21:57:45 GMT 2009
r...@obsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
cpu0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T5250 @ 1.50GHz ("GenuineIntel"
686-class) 1.50 GHz
cpu0:
FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,M
On 05/06/09 13:33, J.C. Roberts wrote:
I need to collect raw throughput statistics without increasing latency
or reducing bandwidth on 10GbE fiber links,
..
> As far as my understanding allows, I believe the best way
to do this is with a physical network tap connected to monitoring
equipment.
Hi allWe are now busy implementing a redundancy environment using
openBSD4.5 with OpenBGPD. In this setting we use a CARP interface to
realize a failover between the primary and the secondary route-server.
With the virtual IP-address we have to admit, the failover works
perfect! But it only works w
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 01:33:28PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2009/05/08 14:20, Alexander Shikoff wrote:
> > Hi Stuart,
> >
> > > cuaU# for USB serial ports, cua## for ns16x50-like devices. think those
> > > are the only choices for serial ports at the moment.
> > >
> > > for your puc(4)
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Ian Turner wrote:
> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Felipe Alfaro Solana
> wrote:
>> We could debate why OpenBSD is inherently more secure than Windows (in
>> fact we could debate why almost any operating system is inherently
>> more secure than Windows). The point
But, that's also up for
debate depending on if you interpret "secure" to be synonymous with
"secure enough" or with "completely secure."
I think you hit the nail on the head there :)
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of
Ian Turner
Se
On 5/8/09 1:24 PM, Karl-Heinz Wild wrote:
Hi,
This seems to me not valid.
from pf.conf(5) :
Ranges of addresses are specified by using the `-' operator. For
instance: ``10.1.1.10 - 10.1.1.12'' means all addresses from 10.1.1.10
to 10.1.1.12, hence addresses 10.1.1.10, 10.1.1.11, and 10.1.
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Felipe Alfaro Solana
wrote:
> We could debate why OpenBSD is inherently more secure than Windows (in
> fact we could debate why almost any operating system is inherently
> more secure than Windows). The point here is OpenBSD is inherently
> more secure because of th
Hello,
take a look at: mount_vnd(8).
Kind regards
Christian
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 02:10:13PM +0300, Cem Kayali wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I've just registered to the list and i hope this is the right list to
> ask a question about OpenBSD.
>
> I would like to ask whether OpenBSD has stable impleme
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Antoine Jacoutot
wrote:
> On Thu, 7 May 2009, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> useradd really does that? A new group for every user? I think that
>> is stupid behaviour. But I will think about if we should this in the
>> script.
>
> I agree, it is stupid behaviour.
>
> FW
On 2009/05/08 14:20, Alexander Shikoff wrote:
> Hi Stuart,
>
> On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 10:35:35AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2009-05-08, Alexander Shikoff wrote:
> > > I only have two serial ports on motherboard, I see them in dmesg:
> > > com0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Chris Harries wrote:
> This is more of a grammar/wording question, but it does go on to the
> security of OS's in general.
>
>
>
> Was having a read of this;
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2009/04/15/ibotnet-trojan.html
>
>
>
> And the last comment made me
Cem Kayali wrote:
Thanks for reply...
Well, i checked that before, but also heard that 'when a system with a
mounted, encrypted virtual filesystem is shutdown uncleanly, the
encrypted virtual filesystem's structures get damaged and, since
OpenBSD's fsck command will not currently acknowledge
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 09:14:00AM +0200, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
> On Thursday 07 May 2009 21.45.00 Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 11:14:17AM +0200, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
> > > > I put a lot of work into azalia(4) in the last release cycel, and I'd
> > > > like to be able to say, when 4
Hi folks,
I have some problems with 4.5 on a sun v440 used as firewall. As soon
as the traffic goes up i got a lot of status problems and the
connections became unstable (packet loss) i.e.:
May 8 10:00:04 sunv440 /bsd: cas0:
status=11389096
May 8 10:00:04 sunv440 /bsd: cas1: status=15081090
May
* Alexander Shikoff [2009-05-08 13:39]:
> Well, I have no any cy-like card. Why I'm getting cuac# devices in /dev ?
they are always there
> There are no tty04..tty10 devices in /dev
cd /dev; sh MAKEDEV tty04
etc for the others
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Servic
Thanks for reply...
Well, i checked that before, but also heard that 'when a system with a
mounted, encrypted virtual filesystem is shutdown uncleanly, the
encrypted virtual filesystem's structures get damaged and, since
OpenBSD's fsck command will not currently acknowledge vnd filesystems,
t
This seems to me not valid.
You can check with
l = "{1.1.1.1,1.1.1.2}"
block from $l
with pfctl -n -v -f file
it produce
l = "{1.1.1.1,1.1.1.2}"
block drop inet from 1.1.1.1 to any
block drop inet from 1.1.1.2 to any
Try next your example.
Karl-Heinz
On 08.05.2009, at 12:37, Cristiano Deana
Hi Stuart,
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 10:35:35AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2009-05-08, Alexander Shikoff wrote:
> > I only have two serial ports on motherboard, I see them in dmesg:
> > com0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
> > com1 at isa0 port 0x2f8/8 irq 3: ns16550a, 1
Hello!
I've just registered to the list and i hope this is the right list to
ask a question about OpenBSD.
I would like to ask whether OpenBSD has stable implementation of storing
data in encrypted format, similar to FreeBSD geli and especially similar
to NetBSD cgd... I have searched throug
Sebastian Rother jpberlin.de> writes:
> vnconfig -cK 52527 -S saltfile /dev/sd0k /dev/svnd1c
I think that does synchronous writes, even if you mount
the svnd device async or softdep, which is why it is so
slow.
After losing a hard disc image _file_ to fsck on the filesy-
stem containing the ima
This is more of a grammar/wording question, but it does go on to the
security of OS's in general.
Was having a read of this;
http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2009/04/15/ibotnet-trojan.html
And the last comment made me think about OpenBSD. The article closes by
saying "this shows that no
Hi,
i think this is a pf's bug:
short description:
internal interface with two different ip's in two different lans:
192.168.20.254/24
192.168.21.254/24
They're used as gateway from the two lans.
nat rules: every 10 ip's use a different public ip.
everithing works fine for the first lan, with
On 2009-05-08, Alexander Shikoff wrote:
> I only have two serial ports on motherboard, I see them in dmesg:
> com0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
> com1 at isa0 port 0x2f8/8 irq 3: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
>
> But if I understand correctly they are named as cua0[0..1].
>
>> PCI s
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 02:27:51PM -0400, Brynet wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
Hello,
before we continue I'd like to tell that I'm a kind of newbie in OpenBSD.
I was using FreeBSD for last 5 years, many things in OpenBSD are almost
the same as in FreeBSD (and vice versa) but also there are many differenc
Darrin Chandler writes:
> This is true of any sites with OpenBSD help. Sometimes I've found some
> info on these sites that's saved me much time, but I'd never take the
> info without thinking it through myself, check against the man pages,
> FAQ, etc.
One common problem is that sites set up by
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> The eBACS project[1]
> times a bunch of different algorithms and implementations on a bunch
> of different CPUs.
[1] http://bench.cr.yp.to
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2009-05-07, carlopmart wrote:
Matthew Dempsky wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 1:47 PM, carlopmart wrote:
Which is that sysctl param Stuart??
net.inet.ip.multipath
See http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#Multipath
I have setup this param previously ... And I think
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> - benchmark aes-ctr performance with current code vs. optimized
> assembly code (e.g., just hacking sys/crypto/rijndael.c to use
> optimized code); if no significant improvement, abort
I didn't have the time to devote to this that I was
On Thursday 07 May 2009 21.45.00 Jacob Meuser wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 11:14:17AM +0200, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
> > > I put a lot of work into azalia(4) in the last release cycel, and I'd
> > > like to be able to say, when 4.6 release comes, that azalia is
> > > "completed".
> > >
> > > by com
49 matches
Mail list logo
