i have buy new ata hdd, and for the first, i try to install openbsd 4.4. i have
succes make partition using openbsd fdisk because i don't want use all of disk
into openbsd, i can boot into openbsd after installation complete
but when i try to install linux as secon OS, why this slice not detek b
]^ Elbiselerinde, Kis Kampanyamiz Basladi.
Bizim icin musteri memnuniyeti herseyden once gelir.
Sizlerle de calismaktan mutluluk duyariz.
oguz is elbiseleri
KISLIK SWEATSHORT(CEP NAKISLI) : 11.00YTL
IS ONLUGU ALPAKA -GABARDIN(CEP NAKISLI ) : 13.00YTL
PANTOLON GABARDIN : 12.00 YTL
IS AYAK
So in summary, the following was done:
- Setup sendmail such as the sendmail that came with OpenBSD or use
some other agent like Postfix such that you can do a `dmesg | mail -s
"Sony VAIO 505R laptop, apm works OK" dm...@openbsd.org` on the
command line.
- Install femail-chroot from package, this
2009/1/21 Amitabh Kant :
> Hi
>
> See if this link is of any use to you.
>
> http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/openbsd-misc/2007/10/15/343352/thread
>
>
> With regards
>
> Amitabh
>
Oh thank you very much this has solved the final piece of the
puzzle!!! It all works now!! Thanks again!!
--
Thi
Hi
See if this link is of any use to you.
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/openbsd-misc/2007/10/15/343352/thread
With regards
Amitabh
2009/1/21 Sunnz :
> 2009/1/21 Henning Brauer :
>> * Sunnz [2009-01-20 17:48]:
>>> Ok so I have copied /etc/resolv.conf to /var/www/etc/...
>>>
>>> Now it says:
>>>
>>> femail: rcpt to chr...@civicquire.net refused by server
>>
>> "refused by server" not enough of a hint?
>>
>
> Ok my mistake, I mi
2009/1/21 Henning Brauer :
> * Sunnz [2009-01-20 17:48]:
>> Ok so I have copied /etc/resolv.conf to /var/www/etc/...
>>
>> Now it says:
>>
>> femail: rcpt to chr...@civicquire.net refused by server
>
> "refused by server" not enough of a hint?
>
Ok my mistake, I mis-spelt the e-mail address. (DOH
2009/1/21 Henning Brauer :
> * Sunnz [2009-01-20 17:48]:
>> Ok so I have copied /etc/resolv.conf to /var/www/etc/...
>>
>> Now it says:
>>
>> femail: rcpt to chr...@civicquire.net refused by server
>
> "refused by server" not enough of a hint?
>
Well the same address and everything worked without
It just looks like your Vista laptop does not reply to ICMP requests for
some reason. As this is a Windows specific problem, I will not try to
solve it. Your tcpdump shows that the laptop uses the router perfectly
fine as a gateway to reach the world, i.e. if the laptop responded with
an ICMP reply
and when I can't connect daemon log is like:
Jan 21 02:50:26 gullabs ppp[7913]: tun0: LCP: deflink: RecvEchoRequest(139)
state = Opened
Jan 21 02:50:26 gullabs ppp[7913]: tun0: LCP: deflink: SendEchoReply(139)
state = Opened
Jan 21 02:50:27 gullabs ppp[7913]: tun0: IPCP: deflink: Error: Unexpected
and when I can't connect daemon log is like:
Jan 21 02:50:26 gullabs ppp[7913]: tun0: LCP: deflink: RecvEchoRequest(139)
state = Opened
Jan 21 02:50:26 gullabs ppp[7913]: tun0: LCP: deflink: SendEchoReply(139)
state = Opened
Jan 21 02:50:27 gullabs ppp[7913]: tun0: IPCP: deflink: Error: Unexpected
I have a lot of info here, but first, seems I cannot ping the Vista client
from the router. Firewall is off... but no ping response. I will post the
tcpdump of this first cause it maybe waht was mentioned earlier is
happening, then i have other info requested.
Jan 21 00:27:58.595813 rule 1/(match)
Quoting Stuart Henderson :
On 2009-01-20, Key Aavoja wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to not use the bridge and use (multicast-)routing
and pf to solve your problem?
Multicast routing with "dvrmpd" is tested with pf, does not work. the
same thing happens, if streamX is allowed to pass out on vla
Hi check firewall settings and also you can do a Traceroute to the problem
machine.
Maybe 2 same Ips???
2009/1/20 Jason Dixon
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 02:25:33PM -0800, duxbuz wrote:
> > Thanks for reply. Both of you.
> >
> > I pinged from client to router, on both routers interfaces 172.16.0.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 02:25:33PM -0800, duxbuz wrote:
> Thanks for reply. Both of you.
No problem. I think it will be easy to point out the problem, if you
post more details:
- ifconfig, 'route -n show -inet', 'pfctl -sr' and 'pfctl -sn' on the
router.
- ifconfig and 'route -n' on the Ubuntu
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 02:25:33PM -0800, duxbuz wrote:
> Thanks for reply. Both of you.
>
> I pinged from client to router, on both routers interfaces 172.16.0.254 and
> 192.168.0.254.
>
> # tcpdump -n -e -ttt -i pflog0
> tcpdump: listening on pflog0, link-type PFLOG
> Jan 20 23:10:58.644031 rul
Thanks for reply. Both of you.
I pinged from client to router, on both routers interfaces 172.16.0.254 and
192.168.0.254.
# tcpdump -n -e -ttt -i pflog0
tcpdump: listening on pflog0, link-type PFLOG
Jan 20 23:10:58.644031 rule 0/(match) pass in on rl0: 192.168.0.10 >
192.168.0.254: icmp: echo req
I use mini-sendmail-chroot.
Works fine.
I use the following script to get all needed stuff inside chroot:
#!/bin/sh
mkdir -p /var/www/usr/lib
cp /usr/lib/libm.so.* /var/www/usr/lib
cp /usr/lib/libssl.so.* /var/www/usr/lib
cp /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.* /var/www/usr/lib
cp /usr/lib/libc.so.* /var/w
On 2009-01-20, u...@o3si.de wrote:
> as the FAQ http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#Multipath states:
>
> "It's worth noting that if an interface used by a multipath route goes
> down (i.e., loses carrier), the kernel will still try to forward
> packets using the route that points to that interfa
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 8:46 PM, frantisek holop wrote:
> hmm, on Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:20:53PM -0500, Brynet said that
>> http://www.u3.com/uninstall/
>
> thanks for the tip, the cd* device is gone :]
> i wish i knew that before.
>
> anyone knows how this utility works?
> i really thoght this w
On 2009-01-20, Key Aavoja wrote:
>> Wouldn't it be better to not use the bridge and use (multicast-)routing
>> and pf to solve your problem?
>
> Multicast routing with "dvrmpd" is tested with pf, does not work. the
> same thing happens, if streamX is allowed to pass out on vlanX and
> streamY is a
On 2009-01-20, TeXitoi wrote:
> "Rioux, Christophe" writes:
>
>> => the 2 other rules will be no more used because of the keep state
>>
>> What is the alternativ to remake some like before the migration ?
looks like you could probably use some reply-to on incoming
connections, instead of route-
> thanks for the tip, the cd* device is gone :]
> i wish i knew that before.
No problem, I'm glad it worked for you. :-)
> anyone knows how this utility works?
I'm not entirely sure, but I'd like to know.. perhaps someone with the
relevant skills can reverse engineer the utility and create somet
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 08:59:27PM +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
> In case the community hasn't already noticed or been made aware of.
> Gilles requires funds (900 Euro) to buy himself a decent desktop computer.
> Gilles initiated and works on the new SMTPd code.
>
> To cross check, his site is at
Hello,
We've recently begun testing using OpenBSD 4.4 with OpenBGP in our datacenter.
Our initial tests have uncovered an odd issue we hope you all can help us
with. I've included our configs and relevant information below.
The summary of our issue is this:
1.) Upon starting bgpd the session be
First try to make a ping from client--->server, then call tcpdump icmp on
the server and check the source address reaching it, make sure that the
source ip is the client's IP.
I bet some node of your network is doing NAT, and the server is responding
the ICMP packets to the equipment doing the na
Hi! I've Openbsd 4.4 with default kernel and connection to Internet by pptp.
Problem is sometimes it connects but sometimes doesn't. But in most cases
when it connects it pings any host with message:
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
ping: wrote ya.ru 64 chars, ret=-1
Here some files:
1. h
"Rioux, Christophe" writes:
> => the 2 other rules will be no more used because of the keep state
>
> What is the alternativ to remake some like before the migration ?
no state, see pf.conf(5)
--
Guillaume Pinot http://www.irccyn.ec-nantes.fr/~pinot/
``Computers are good at
hmm, on Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:20:53PM -0500, Brynet said that
> http://www.u3.com/uninstall/
thanks for the tip, the cd* device is gone :]
i wish i knew that before.
anyone knows how this utility works?
i really thoght this was hw based!
and can anyone still with the U3 stuff reproduce
the m
It's hard to find a USB drive that doesn't have that U3 nonsense,
you'll need to find a friend that has a Windows or Mac system to get
rid of it.
http://www.u3.com/uninstall/
-Brynet
here's the dmesg for this cruzer:
umass2 at uhub0 port 4 configuration 1 interface 0 "SanDisk Corporation U3
Cruzer Micro" rev 2.00/0.10 addr 4
umass2: using SCSI over Bulk-Only
scsibus2 at umass2: 2 targets, initiator 0
sd2 at scsibus2 targ 1 lun 0: SCSI2 0/direct
removable
sd2: 3912MB, 512 by
What happens when you ping from the OpenBSD router? Does any of the
other equipment reply?
The Ubuntu machine's firewall settings can be seen by running 'sudo
iptables -L -v -n'. Are you sure it doesn't block incoming ICMP
requests?
Martin
Quoting Stuart Henderson :
On 2009-01-20, Guido Tschakert wrote:
first thing: I do not have any experience with multicast traffic.
But what you have build seems very strange to me. First you use vlan to
separate the networks an then you put them alltogether with a bridge.
I do not see the use
I have had to repost this due to formatting on last post.
Hi,
I have an openbsd router running pf. Using a 'pass all' rule set.
pass in log all keep state
pass out log all keep state
I manage to ping one way! But not the other.
I originally had a wireless laptop running vista on 172.0.
Quoting Guido Tschakert :
Key Aavoja schrieb:
Hello,
Hello,
first thing: I do not have any experience with multicast traffic.
But what you have build seems very strange to me. First you use vlan to
separate the networks an then you put them alltogether with a bridge.
I do not see the use of
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:37:11 +0100
frantisek holop wrote:
> hi there,
>
> the sandisk cruzer line of pen-drives (i have a 4G)
> are U3 smart pen-drives that have a hidden partition
> or whatever it is: www.u3.com .
>
> in openbsd it comes up as cd* besides the sd* part.
> i had no luck mounting
* Sunnz [2009-01-20 17:48]:
> Ok so I have copied /etc/resolv.conf to /var/www/etc/...
>
> Now it says:
>
> femail: rcpt to chr...@civicquire.net refused by server
"refused by server" not enough of a hint?
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Fu
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:08:30AM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> sorry for the delay. can you see if this fixes the problem?
>
> something of a guess, but the addition of S/PDIF support is the only
> change that fits the timeline of when it was working and when
> the problem started. (and if you
hi there,
the sandisk cruzer line of pen-drives (i have a 4G)
are U3 smart pen-drives that have a hidden partition
or whatever it is: www.u3.com .
in openbsd it comes up as cd* besides the sd* part.
i had no luck mounting it or using it in any way.
IIRC in windows it comes up as a separate drive
> Hi,
>
> I need a help to configure an openBSD server to load balance and
> failover internet connection.
> I have 2 connections to the internet.
> I followed http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html#outgoing but i
> didn4t get it working.
> I added both routes with:
> route add -mpath default 20
Sunnz wrote:
I also tried the following:
`chroot -g www -u www / /var/www/bin/femail -t -i m...@myaddress.com` works, but
Setting the chroot to '/'? I don't think that does anything.
`chroot -g www -u www /var/www/ /bin/femail -t -i m...@myaddress.com`
doesn't work, it says:
femail: non-r
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:04:36PM -0200, Ricardo Augusto de Souza wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need a help to configure an openBSD server to load balance and failover
> internet connection.
> I have 2 connections to the internet.
> I followed http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html#outgoing but i didn4t g
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, Sunnz wrote:
> I have set up mail and femail and they both works, just not in a chroot.
>
Remember that the chroot must provide *ALL* services required by the app,
including things like DNS.
Is your resolv.conf present in /etc of your chroot?
Can you chroot from the command
Hi,
I need a help to configure an openBSD server to load balance and failover
internet connection.
I have 2 connections to the internet.
I followed http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html#outgoing but i didn4t get
it working.
I added both routes with:
route add -mpath default 200.162.41.33
route
2009/1/21 Sunnz :
>
> I am also trying mini-sendmail-chroot.
>
> `chroot -g www -u www /var/www/ /bin/mini_sendmail -t -i m...@myaddress.com`
>
> Does actually work but in PHP still doesn't. And I have updated
> sendmail_path in php.ini.
>
Err this is so weird... now it doesn't work any more even
2009/1/21 Joe Barnett :
>
> Many moons ago I had the same situation with mini-sendmail-chroot.
> Installing mail (?) and sh in the chroot seemed to clear everything
> up--though I am not sure if that is the optimal solution.
I am also trying mini-sendmail-chroot.
`chroot -g www -u www /var/www/ /
Ok so I have copied /etc/resolv.conf to /var/www/etc/...
Now it says:
femail: rcpt to chr...@civicquire.net refused by server
Sunnz wrote:
> I have set up mail and femail and they both works, just not in a chroot.
>
> Basically I can do `mail m...@myaddress.com` or `/var/www/bin/femail
> m...@myaddress.com` and both of then successfully sent an email to
> myself.
>
> But it doesn't work with Apache in the chroot. I was
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 03:10:07 +1100
Sunnz wrote:
> I have set up mail and femail and they both works, just not in a
> chroot.
>
> Basically I can do `mail m...@myaddress.com` or `/var/www/bin/femail
> m...@myaddress.com` and both of then successfully sent an email to
> myself.
>
> But it doesn't
I have set up mail and femail and they both works, just not in a chroot.
Basically I can do `mail m...@myaddress.com` or `/var/www/bin/femail
m...@myaddress.com` and both of then successfully sent an email to
myself.
But it doesn't work with Apache in the chroot. I was using a PHP script.
femail
In case the community hasn't already noticed or been made aware of.
Gilles requires funds (900 Euro) to buy himself a decent desktop computer.
Gilles initiated and works on the new SMTPd code.
To cross check, his site is at http://www.poolp.org/~gilles/
Please donate via paypal: gil...@poolp.org
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 01:59:52PM +, someone wrote:
>
> Rules? You mean this?
>
> >pass in log all keep state
> >pass out log all keep state
>
> Formatting got screwed up when i posted
Seriously, trim your From: address. And your formatting is still
terrible. I couldn't read most of y
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:21:37AM +, someone wrote:
> Hi,
> I have an openbsd router running pf. Using a 'pass all' rule set.
> pass in log all keep state pass out log all keep state
> I manage to ping one way! But not the other.
> I originally had a wireless laptop running vista on 172.0.0.6,
Hi
I read in the manual, that since the 4.1 version, the keep state rule is
automatically set to keep state.
Before migrating to 4.4, I had the 3.9 and with following configuration:
Internet1 |
OpenBsd (Internal)| --- Server
Internet2 |
O
1.15 should just work fine in stable.
-m
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:19:34PM +0100, Christoph Leser wrote:
> As described in
> http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/openbsd-misc/2008/9/22/3364064
> there is a problem with the driver for the AMD Geode LX series processor
> security block for openBSD 4.
On 2009-01-20, Guido Tschakert wrote:
> first thing: I do not have any experience with multicast traffic.
> But what you have build seems very strange to me. First you use vlan to
> separate the networks an then you put them alltogether with a bridge.
> I do not see the use of the vlans.
It can i
Hi,
I have an openbsd router running pf. Using a 'pass all' rule set.
pass in log all keep state pass out log all keep state
I manage to ping one way! But not the other.
I originally had a wireless laptop running vista on 172.0.0.6, trying to ping
Server 2003 on 192.168.0.4.
default Gateways set in
As described in
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/openbsd-misc/2008/9/22/3364064
there is a problem with the driver for the AMD Geode LX series processor
security block for openBSD 4.4 ( glxsb.c ).
This has been fixed in version 1.15 of this file, but this fix has not
been committed to 4.4. stable
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 06:09:24PM +0100, Martin Toft wrote:
> A small follow-up:
>
> The problem only occurs when opening the audio device. If I queue a
> number of tracks in mpd's playlist and let it play, then it does not
> suddenly start making noise from one track to the next. It only happens
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 08:45:05PM -0800, Joe S wrote:
> It's clear there will be no ZFS in OpenBSD. It's not a priority of the
> developers.
"ZFS-like" functionality could be added to softraid. This would be more
realistic.
--
Best Regards
Edd Barrett
(Freelance software developer / technic
Key Aavoja schrieb:
> Hello,
>
Hello,
first thing: I do not have any experience with multicast traffic.
But what you have build seems very strange to me. First you use vlan to
separate the networks an then you put them alltogether with a bridge.
I do not see the use of the vlans.
Wouldn't it be
Dear list,
I've successfully installed the 'ser' package (ser-0.8.10p1) and its
dependences with pkg_add, on a 4.4-release.
Using a simple config file as described in ser's doc that has been
tested on other systems, I get the following kind of errors:
# ser D E
ser:/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.
62 matches
Mail list logo
