but that 9dhcp) is not the requirement. I would like help setting the static
IP on the node. this used to work - and after the 4.4 upgrade, I am having
issues..
any help folks...
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Maurice Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday, November 20, 2008 at 2
On Thursday, November 20, 2008 at 20:07:02 -0800, Jon wrote:
>the /etc/hostname.em0 has 'inet 255.255.255.0 NONE' in it.
>
>I can resolve using the gateway as my nameserver in /etc/resolve.conf
>
>the thing won't allow any traffic to go out - I am trying to ping
>yahoo.com...
>
>But if i update /e
2008/11/20 Aaron W. Hsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:14:32 -0500
> "Aaron W. Hsu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:46:08 -0800 (PST)
> > jimerickso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > does openbsd current have support for the atheros 5424 wireless
> chipset?
ok - so I figured out that my subnet mask is 255.255.255.252.. Changed it &
still not working..
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Jon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Also - after trying a few different options, basic connectivity (to the
> modem) only works if the hostname.em0 say
>
> inet xx
Also - after trying a few different options, basic connectivity (to the
modem) only works if the hostname.em0 say
inet xx.xx.12.145 xx.xx.12.0 NONE
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Jon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> thanks for the response.. I meant ifconfig..
>
> also - how do I get the bro
thanks for the response.. I meant ifconfig..
also - how do I get the broadcast ?
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Girish Venkatachalam <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10:28:34 Nov 21, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
> >
> > If you set named=" " in /etc/rc.conf.local you can use your
>
> Typo. It
> Just wondering if anyone else on the list that has a realtek 8169s and
> running 4.4 release and able to run a GigE connection from their
> OpenBSD box to another GigE device, if they can maintain a complete
> connection when they force the re driver via ifconfig to 1000baseT.
> Might simply be
On 10:28:34 Nov 21, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
>
> If you set named=" " in /etc/rc.conf.local you can use your
Typo. It should be
named_flags=""
-Girish
On 20:07:02 Nov 20, Jon wrote:
> I have updated the /etc/myname with the server
> I have updated the /etc/mygate with the comcast's gateway IP
> I have set the IP address using ipconfig
? ipconfig?
> the /etc/hostname.em0 has 'inet 255.255.255.0 NONE' in it.
Shouldn't it be
inet 192.168.1.23
hi folks,
I am at my wits end.. may be a small thing - i don't know..
I have comcast with a static IP and run my OpenBSD node as my web server &
ssh server etc.
My model has both a private IP DHCP server and is set to route to the public
static IP as well.
I have updated the /etc/myname with th
On 2008-11-21, Don Hiatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was looking at http://openntpd.org/ for the latest Portable
> OpenBSD an saw that it is at 3.9p1 while the non-portable is
> at 4.3. A colleague of mine is tired of fighting with ntpd.org's
> ntpd server so I suggested OpenNTPD. Is there a new
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 10:34 PM, Jose de Paula Eufrasio Junior
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, before anything else, I did read all material about the OpenBSD
> security policies on the website. Now I am trying to get some more
> insider insight on it.
> Writing a paper about open source softw
On 2008-11-21, Don Hiatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was looking at http://openntpd.org/ for the latest Portable
> OpenBSD an saw that it is at 3.9p1 while the non-portable is
> at 4.3. A colleague of mine is tired of fighting with ntpd.org's
> ntpd server so I suggested OpenNTPD. Is there a new
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:14:32 -0500
"Aaron W. Hsu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:46:08 -0800 (PST)
> jimerickso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > does openbsd current have support for the atheros 5424 wireless chipset?
>
> I currently have a Macbook Pro with an Atheros AR5424
> I was looking at http://openntpd.org/ for the latest Portable
> OpenBSD an saw that it is at 3.9p1 while the non-portable is
> at 4.3.
I meant latest Portable OpenNTPD, not OpenBSD. Sorry. :)
I was looking at http://openntpd.org/ for the latest Portable
OpenBSD an saw that it is at 3.9p1 while the non-portable is
at 4.3. A colleague of mine is tired of fighting with ntpd.org's
ntpd server so I suggested OpenNTPD. Is there a newer version
of the Portable OpenNTPD or is 3.9p1 the latest?
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:46:08 -0800 (PST)
jimerickso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> does openbsd current have support for the atheros 5424 wireless chipset?
I currently have a Macbook Pro with an Atheros AR5424 chip, and it
works pretty well.
ath0 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 "Atheros AR5424" rev 0x01
nope . . . but I have word that it's on the agenda.
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=122397192803618&w=2
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 3:46 PM, jimerickso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> does openbsd current have support for the atheros 5424 wireless chipset?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 4:46 PM, jimerickso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> does openbsd current have support for the atheros 5424 wireless chipset?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/atheros-5424-wireless-chipset-tp20610633p20610633.html
> Sent from the openbsd user - misc
does openbsd current have support for the atheros 5424 wireless chipset?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/atheros-5424-wireless-chipset-tp20610633p20610633.html
Sent from the openbsd user - misc mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Whyzzi wrote:
Answers to your questions are inline /w the question
2008/11/18 tico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
1. Why is this sent to the "ports@" mailing list ?
I've lurked the list for a long time - since around 2.8. I've asked
the odd question here and/or there, and got flamed once when I
On 2008-11-20, Whyzzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I didn't think there was a need for a cross-over cable.
> I tossed it in there trying to be thorough.
Some chips disable auto MDI/MDI-X when autoneg is forced.
in those cases you can't use a standard cable, you'll need
a specially wired cable (bot
?A DONDE VAMOS A LLEGAR?
PEN DRIVE KINGSTON DE 64GB!
COMPARA PRECIOS!
KINGSTON
16GB : 18.6
32GB : 39.85
64GB: 77.25
SONY
INCLUE ADAPTADOR MEMORY STICK
MS PRO DUO 1GB: 6.95
MS MICRO M2 4GB: 12.10
MS PRO DUO 8GB: 24.50
MS PRO DUO 16GB: 36.97
SANDISK
MS MICRO M2 8GB : 24.10
PEN DRI
On Wednesday 19 November 2008 20:48, John Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 08:18:00PM -0800, Jeff Simmons wrote:
> > I need, at a minimum, which virtual server at a particular IP address is
> > being accessed, and the contents of any GET commands (methods). If
> > there's a way to get this
While most modern PATA drives (circa 2000/2001) have the ATA security features
included in their electronics, it is not clear to me how usable the atactl
security commands are for the typical OpenBSD admin with PATA drives.
1. Many BIOSes issue a FREEZE LOCK on discovery, disabling security
c
Might simply be a bad card or even a bad setup, but I *believe* there
might be a problem with the re driver and was looking for some
external collaboration. I didn't think there was a need for a
cross-over cable. I tossed it in there trying to be thorough.
Thanks for the response! If this is actua
>> unless you anchor/proxy all media as well on the
>> Asterisk (I don't know Asterisk so I don't know if it does that).
>
> it does, and most people run it that way (canreinvite=no).
Good to know.
Thanks,
-Martin
Stuart Henderson wrote:
I have a problem with altq on OpenBSD 4.4 firewall, but I can not be
properly understood how altq works.
...
I have attached my pf.conf
this is way too complicated for you to get a good understanding
of how altq works.
please start with something simpler.
I ha
>> I have a problem with altq on OpenBSD 4.4 firewall, but I can not be
>> properly understood how altq works.
...
>> I have attached my pf.conf
this is way too complicated for you to get a good understanding
of how altq works.
please start with something simpler.
> Is this rule perhaps ca
Whyzzi wrote:
Just wondering if anyone else on the list that has a realtek 8169s and
running 4.4 release and able to run a GigE connection from their
OpenBSD box to another GigE device, if they can maintain a complete
connection when they force the re driver via ifconfig to 1000baseT.
Incase you
carlopmart wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a problem with altq on OpenBSD 4.4 firewall, but I can not be
> properly
> understood how altq works. I need to guarantee 80% bandwidth to http,
> smtp, etc (not udp services) of my DSL line. And the rest of this
> bandwidth to use for udp or other proto
On 2008-11-20, Girish Venkatachalam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 19:32:58 Nov 19, Jason Beaudoin wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Mikel Lindsaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > FWIW I run about 8 asterisk servers behind openbsd firewalls. I have found
>> > the most non-problemat
Hi all,
I have a problem with altq on OpenBSD 4.4 firewall, but I can not be properly
understood how altq works. I need to guarantee 80% bandwidth to http, smtp, etc
(not udp services) of my DSL line. And the rest of this bandwidth to use for
udp
or other protocols. Of course, if any udp ser
Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
The wpi in my ThinkPad R60 has worked as flawlessly as those things do
for quite a while now, but after upgrading to the latest snapshot and
installing the
result of `ftp
http://damien.bergamini.free.fr/packages/openbsd/wpi-firmware-3.0.tgz`
the system now claims the
Just wondering if anyone else on the list that has a realtek 8169s and
running 4.4 release and able to run a GigE connection from their
OpenBSD box to another GigE device, if they can maintain a complete
connection when they force the re driver via ifconfig to 1000baseT.
Incase you are wondering I
hi,
quite a bit of work is being put into azalia. there have been quite
a few patches sent to tech@ and more will follow. if you want to
help with azalia, please subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and if you're not the kind of person who follows bleeding edge
development or doesn't like building ke
The wpi in my ThinkPad R60 has worked as flawlessly as those things do
for quite a while now, but after upgrading to the latest snapshot and
installing the
result of `ftp
http://damien.bergamini.free.fr/packages/openbsd/wpi-firmware-3.0.tgz`
the system now claims the wpi wireless has been disable
On 2008-11-20, Don Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would "sure be nice" if someone would create an OpenBSD port of
> FreeSwitch.
I started but it doesn't work yet. If anyone's interested in
picking it up, mail me, but it is quite a challenge. Lots of things
are built internally that need
Hi.
I have a router with ip 192.168.0.1 and I get such messages in maillog when
cron try to send report:
router sm-msp-queue[3879]: mAFNUix6020927: to=root, delay=4+12:59:18,
xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=19473085, relay=[127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0,
stat=Deferred: Connection refused by [127.0.
On 2008-11-20, Martin Gignac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> unless you anchor/proxy all media as well on the
> Asterisk (I don't know Asterisk so I don't know if it does that).
it does, and most people run it that way (canreinvite=no).
On 2008-11-20, John Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 08:18:00PM -0800, Jeff Simmons wrote:
>> I need, at a minimum, which virtual server at a particular IP address is
>> being
>> accessed, and the contents of any GET commands (methods). If there's a way
>> to
>> get
Jose de Paula Eufrasio Junior wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 7:44 AM, Janne Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You said twice above that you read all materials and couldn't figure out if
the code is always available or have periodic releases? Booo.
As I also said:
"I used the same question
Vous avez des envies d'evasion ? Vous rjvez de rencontres et de dipaysement ?
Le Riad Schanez vous ouvre ses portes
Le Riad Schanez offre le calme et le confort d'un riad d'exception.
Ricemment rinovi, le Riad Schanez vous siduira par son charme, son patio
idialement utilisi et par sa localisa
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Janne Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You said twice above that you read all materials and couldn't figure out if
> the code is always available or have periodic releases? Booo.
) ( ((
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 7:44 AM, Janne Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You said twice above that you read all materials and couldn't figure out if
> the code is always available or have periodic releases? Booo.
As I also said:
"I used the same questions on all
projects I researched so the
Jose de Paula Eufrasio Junior wrote:
Hello, before anything else, I did read all material about the OpenBSD
security policies on the website.
...
I read the documentation on the site already and would like to get some
more info about the process.
...
2) The OpenBSD and OpenSSH code is alway
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 08:18:00PM -0800, Jeff Simmons wrote:
> I need, at a minimum, which virtual server at a particular IP address is
> being
> accessed, and the contents of any GET commands (methods). If there's a way to
> get this via tcpdump I haven't found it yet.
Just increase the snapl
Jose de Paula Eufrasio Junior wrote:
Hello, before anything else, I did read all material about the OpenBSD
security policies on the website.
...
I read the documentation on the site already and would like to get some
more info about the process.
...
2) The OpenBSD and OpenSSH code is alway
48 matches
Mail list logo
