> Are you *sure* you don't mean "while still providing the _internal
> network_ recursive queries" or "not provide _reverse_ queries"? Really,
> really sure?
no I am not sure, My DNS skills are not what they need to be. I am
working on improving them.
I am just getting tired of the endless worm
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 12:03:30AM -0500, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Jon Radel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> > >> > (...) I want to host email for 10 different domains (...)
> > >> If you're currently using a setup that involves the same
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:03 PM, Sam Fourman Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Jon Radel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
If you're currently using a setup that involves the same IP
address for both authoritative (domains you host) and recursive
queri
On Thu, 8 May 2008 00:03:30 -0500, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
>On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Jon Radel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
>> >> > I assume that if I want to host email for 10 different domains I have
>> >> If you're currently using a setup that involves the
On Thu, 08 May 2008 09:41:23 +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> Apache reacts very slow. Despite of a load <0.5,
> lynx 127.0.0.1 (as root) takes more than 5-10 seconds until the static
> -rwxr-x--- 1 root www 2236 Dec 12 2006 /var/www/htdocs/index.html
> props up. Any other task on the system is done
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 07:26:25AM -0700, Ed Flecko wrote:
> Thanks, Adam.
>
> To test even "Basic" authentication, I created a file named
> "passwords" in the htdocs directory to confirm that Apache could reach
> it. :-)
>
> Then I made this entry in the httpd.conf file:
>
>
> AuthType Basic
>
Steve Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have keep state entries for all of my rules, so I don't know where
> the problem could be. The ruleset is available here:
> http://www.sjohnson.info/other/pf.conf
>
> The only thing I've removed from the ruleset are aliases and table
> definitions.
Le
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Jon Radel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> >> > I assume that if I want to host email for 10 different domains I have
> >> If you're currently using a setup that involves the same IP
> >> address for both authoritative (domains you host)
Steve Johnson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a new setup with a 4.3 PF firewall that includes CARP addresses,
> trunked VLANs and HA. We've migrated from a different architecture, so
> the rules have never been tested on a different version before. I've
> tried to setup the first unit with my ruleset,
http://xkcd.com/378/
---
James A. Peltier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.site-fx.net
--- On Wed, 5/7/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Editing C with...
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Received: Wedne
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 04:09:43PM -0400, Steve Johnson wrote:
> I have a new setup with a 4.3 PF firewall that includes CARP addresses,
> trunked VLANs and HA. We've migrated from a different architecture, so the
> rules have never been tested on a different version before. I've tried to
> setu
Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
>> > I assume that if I want to host email for 10 different domains I have
>> > to have these set
>> >
>> > allow-recursion { any; };
>>
>> This allows anybody to use your nameserver as a resolver (e.g.
>> anyone can ask you to lookup domains for them). You shouldn't
>>
--- Matthew Szudzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> And anyway, I'm
a minimalist (that's why I run OpenBSD). nvi is
> fine--vim and emacs just
have too much bloat.
Which is why we have mg in tree: emacs without the
bloat.
If your users are in /home and you're not willing to modify your filesystem
layout much, you could simply export your /home as readonly nfs share and mount
it to /var/www/users.
something like that should work in /etc/exports:
/home -alldirs,ro 127.0.0.1
$ mount_nfs -o rw 127.0.0.1:/hom
I learned emacs before vi, but I could never remember all of emacs'
complicated keystrokes. It feels as though there are far fewer commands
to memorize in vi, and the commands that I do memorize are also useful
for writing sed scripts--so the payoff of a little memorization in vi
is greater than t
After the successful upgrade of the first machine, I have some trouble
with the second.
Chances are that the trouble is my fault, but I could still appreciate a clue:
Apache reacts very slow. Despite of a load <0.5,
lynx 127.0.0.1 (as root) takes more than 5-10 seconds until the static
-rwxr-x---
> > I assume that if I want to host email for 10 different domains I have
> > to have these set
> >
> > allow-recursion { any; };
>
> This allows anybody to use your nameserver as a resolver (e.g.
> anyone can ask you to lookup domains for them). You shouldn't
> do this at all without a very
On Wednesday 07 May 2008 10:53:23 Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I have a pair of Gigabyte cards which identify the same way;
>
> ral0 at pci0 dev 16 function 0 "Ralink RT2560" rev 0x01: irq 10,
> address 00:0f:ea:84:f4:ed ral0: MAC/BBP RT2560 (rev 0x04), RF RT2525
>
> They are terrible, very poor sign
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Parvinder Bhasin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Appreciate any help.
>
> Thanks :)
Does netstat show it listening on the correct IP? any reason to run
net-snmp? I'd use the base snmpd unless you have a very specific
reason to run net-snmp.
aaron.glenn
On 2008-05-07, Sam Fourman Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> here is my trouble, if i use nslookup from a computer that is set to
> use my name server(ns.wiscdns.com)
> my output is as follows:
>
> Sam# nslookup 12.192.128.135
> Server: 12.192.128.131
> Address: 12.192.128.131#53
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Sam Fourman Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> now that I am trying to host a mail server, I found out my reverse
> lookup is not working correctly
>
> we have a /25 ip block on our T1
...
> however if I change my name server to a local ISP (that I do not use
>
hello misc@
I am in need of some guidance, I am trying to convert our name servers
from Windows 2000 DNS to OpenBSD named
I put this name server up last October and it has worked great, or at
least i thought it did.
now that I am trying to host a mail server, I found out my reverse
lookup is not
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Paul Pruett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What things should I check to fix mknod, short of format hard drive?
You should back up user data, scrub, and reinstall. At this point,
you don't really know what was done to break your system and have no
reason to be conf
Hello,
> Personally, I've given up on using OpenBSD as an AP--though I have for
> years. Back when I used wi, everything worked very well. However,
> 802.11g drivers/cards work very poorly as APs. While speed with them
> can be good at times, different wireless clients performed erratically
> a
You can always use the name of comand instead keystrokes. Also you can
customize these keys and change the defaults (customizable)
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 6:28 PM, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I gave emacs quite the fighting chance. Used it for 4 weeks and could
> not deal with th
Hi,
I have a new setup with a 4.3 PF firewall that includes CARP addresses,
trunked VLANs and HA. We've migrated from a different architecture, so
the rules have never been tested on a different version before. I've
tried to setup the first unit with my ruleset, but all forwarded packets
seem
If you want to stick with what's in the tree,
mg does a fine job. Compiles,
parses errors, jumps to the correct line, and so on.
Apologies, but so far suggestions have not worked.
What things should I check to fix mknod, short of format hard drive?
Situation, after possibly messing up using a wrong MAKDEV during upgrade
to OBSD 4.3 (amd64) from beta, I fixed by making sure /dev was empty of all, then
booting from sta
I gave emacs quite the fighting chance. Used it for 4 weeks and could
not deal with the sore hands & fingers anymore.
emacs is great for people that don't mind finger gymnastics. Vim is
much nicer for people with sore hands.
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 04:55:55PM +0100, overdrive openbsd wrote:
> H
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 08:12:52AM -0700, Andrew Stone wrote:
>
> I'm currently having trouble getting my f7 and 78 brightness keys to
> work on my laptop. I would appreciate any help getting these to work,
> or alternative methods for changing my screen brightness. I think
> it must be configurab
> It looks like newegg carries the EDIMAX EW-7128G. Since I bought the
> previous card from them as well, maybe I'll have them switch them and
> see if I have any better luck. Thanks for the suggestion.
>
We have done testing with that card as well, we used 3 circular 14db
antennas on a 110ft
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 11:16:29AM -0500, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> > I'd really like to have a sure-fire, always-works MiniPCI card for
> > hostap that can be bought individually... any suggestions? are the 11n
> > ral(4) any more predictable? anyone got CM9 working?
>
> We have had decent luck
On 5/6/08, Emilio Perea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Although I've never had to deal with Vista, previous versions of Windows
> had a "Resource Kit" available which includes vi. With some Vista
> versions you can install SUA (Subsystem for UNIX Applications) which
> includes tcsh and ksh with v
Hi all,
I'm currently having trouble getting my f7 and 78 brightness keys to work on my
laptop. I would appreciate any help getting these to work, or alternative
methods for changing my screen brightness. I think it must be configurable
because it changes vastly when I am either plugged in to A
> I'd really like to have a sure-fire, always-works MiniPCI card for
> hostap that can be bought individually... any suggestions? are the 11n
> ral(4) any more predictable? anyone got CM9 working?
We have had decent luck with ral RT2860 chipset we use the edimax PCI cards.
I sent a few of them
I used Emacs for more than 10 years, and now I use vim. I like it
better. There is no single thing that is right for everyone.
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 04:55:55PM +0100, overdrive openbsd wrote:
> Hi Jordi,
>
> I don't want to start a flamewar, but I will say my experience; after
> lot of years us
Hi Jordi,
I don't want to start a flamewar, but I will say my experience; after
lot of years using vi and vim, I decide 'taste' emacs. Now I can see
that the major part of users those use vi/vim is because they never
tried more than 5 minutes on emacs or directly they never tried. Now I
am more pr
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 11:05:35PM -0400, James Turner wrote:
> Some info, the ral(4) is a Gigabyte GN-WP01GS which is an RT2561S. My
> basic hostname.ral0 reads: inet 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 NONE media
> autoselect mode 11g mediaopt hostap nwid my_net nwkey secret chan 11.
I'm also using ral
On Wed, 7 May 2008, Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
> If someone happens to run saslauthd 2.1.22 on OpenBSD and uses rimap as
> authmech against a cyrus server, please try to authenticate using a
> password with double-quotes. I think we've found a bug here and it would
> be neat to have a confirmation
On Wed, 07 May 2008 21:03:18 +0700, smartTERRA NOC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
An IBM x3250 looks like this on dmesg:
OpenBSD 4.3-current (GENERIC.MP) #0: Thu Mar 13 05:46:13 WIT 2008
As discussed on this ML a MP enable kernel is not a good choice for a
performant firewall solution...
Falk
Thanks, Adam.
To test even "Basic" authentication, I created a file named
"passwords" in the htdocs directory to confirm that Apache could reach
it. :-)
Then I made this entry in the httpd.conf file:
AuthType Basic
AuthName "Private"
AuthUserFile /var/www/htdocs/passwords
Require user stephanie
An IBM x3250 looks like this on dmesg:
OpenBSD 4.3-current (GENERIC.MP) #0: Thu Mar 13 05:46:13 WIT 2008
As discussed on this ML a MP enable kernel is not a good choice for a
performant firewall solution...
Falk
If someone happens to run saslauthd 2.1.22 on OpenBSD and uses rimap as
authmech against a cyrus server, please try to authenticate using a
password with double-quotes. I think we've found a bug here and it would
be neat to have a confirmation.
Thanks,
--
Stephan A. Rickauer
If you are using the OpenBSD's apache with a default configuration:
Firstly, open httpd.conf, then modify UserDir disabled to UserDir
/var/www/users. Then, uncomment following lines:
410
411 AllowOverride FileInfo AuthConfig Limit
412 Options MultiViews Indexes SymLinksIfOwne
On 2008-05-06, Ed Flecko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've created a user (Stephanie) on the box, and I've added her to the
> /etc/ftpchroot file so she can upload stuff to her directory; now I
> just want her to be able to reach whatever she uploads (which probably
> will be just a bunch of files)
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 07:30:17AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2008-05-07, Daniel Melameth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Personally, I've given up on using OpenBSD as an AP--though I have for
> > years. Back when I used wi, everything worked very well. However,
> > 802.11g drivers/cards
Ed Flecko wrote:
> I've created a user (Stephanie) on the box, and I've added her to the
> /etc/ftpchroot file so she can upload stuff to her directory...
>
> 1.) Can someone tell me what I'm doing wrong?
How about trying sftp or scp to avoid sending login information in the
clear? There are eve
Hi,
This is the solution I use :
mkdir /var/www/users/myuser/
chown myuser:myuser /var/www/users/myuser
cd /home/myuser and create a symbolic link www -> /var/www/users/myuser
I wish it help.
Ed Flecko wrote:
Hi folks,
I have a few questions about how to set up users on my OBSD 4.3 box.
I'v
On Wed, 7 May 2008, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
just one other data point, this is the Gigabyte badged card in my home
gateway, works IME better than the ath it replaced:
ral0 at pci1 dev 4 function 0 "Ralink RT2561S" rev 0x00: irq 12, address
00:1a:4d:3c:88:76
ral0: MAC/BBP RT2561C, RF RT2527
just one other data point, this is the Gigabyte badged card in my home
gateway, works IME better than the ath it replaced:
ral0 at pci1 dev 4 function 0 "Ralink RT2561S" rev 0x00: irq 12, address
00:1a:4d:3c:88:76
ral0: MAC/BBP RT2561C, RF RT2527
- P
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first
On 5/6/08, Geoff Steckel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I use them for firewalls and disk servers. For that they work
> quite well. Yes, graphics are painfully slow, but I think that's the
> fault of the integrated graphics. Using a PCI graphics card seems
> to speed them up quite a bit.
>
> One of
First, Theo, thank you for your work to keep non-free drivers out of
free operating systems. I am a die-hard GNU, however I really respect
your work and applaud you for giving you time. Every push counts.
Does someone have a list of companies (model numbers included) that have
produced free driver
On 2008-05-06, Adam Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had purchased a new supported mini-pci car for my x41 Tablet only to
> find out that tpwireless doesn't support the x41 series as well as some
> others.
>
> Is there any alternative way that people know of for unlocking this in
> the x
On 2008-05-07, Pierre Riteau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have a ral (MSI54G PCI card in a Soekris 4801 pf firewall) that I use
>
> I agree this is a good card, I have the very same:
> ral0 at pci1 dev 8 function 0 "Ralink RT2560" rev 0x01: irq 11, address
> 00:13:d3:00:43:fc
> ral0: MAC/BBP RT
I have a X41 Tablet, and it has standard Atheros wireless:
04:02.0 Ethernet controller: Atheros Communications, Inc. AR5212
802.11abg NIC (rev 01)
Tom.
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 04:15:23PM +1000, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> On Tue, 6 May 2008 23:26:26 -0600, Daniel Melameth wrote:
>
> >On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 9:05 PM, James Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I've been trying to get my new ral(4) card to work like I would expect it
> >> to. I've read
But you Jordi, when you reply, you can be a little more soft ? Everybody
do mistakes, give a chance to all ;)
I will.
On 2008-05-07, Daniel Melameth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Personally, I've given up on using OpenBSD as an AP--though I have for
> years. Back when I used wi, everything worked very well. However,
> 802.11g drivers/cards work very poorly as APs.
Some 802.11g drivers/cards... I've had nothing b
On 2008-05-07, Parvinder Bhasin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am having some issues getting snmpd going on one of my boxes ,
> wondering if some snmp guru can help me here.
Do you actually need some Net-SNMP feature? Despite the comment at
the bottom of snmpd(8), the snmpd in base works well fo
59 matches
Mail list logo
