2008/2/11, Fredrik Carlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Edd Barrett gmail.com> writes:
>
> The owner forgot to renew it and I can't reach him, so the site has moved
> to
> http://openports.se
>
> Regards
> Fredrik Carlsson
>
>
Since it is not renewed is it possble for someone else to take over it?
I'
Chris Jones writes:
> A while back I attempted to setup a route-based VPN tunnel between a
> Fortigate firewall and an OpenBSD firewall with no success. I now have
> the need to get this to work and wondering if someone on the list can
> shed some light on the configuration. The end goal is to
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 10:43:36PM +0100, Aurilien wrote:
> In the [manual flows] section of the ipsec.conf man page, the [type
> modifier] parameter doesn't explain require, use, acquire and dontacq
> modifiers. The explanation from the old ipsecadm(8) should be use:
>
fixed now. thanks for the
Mike Larkin wrote:
I see. Just for my personal reference, was this limitation documented
somewhere (just want to make sure I didn't miss anything)...?
If not, should it be?
Finally, did this limitation always exist? I do recall several other
posters mentioning that they had similar configurat
Jay Hart wrote:
Yes, I too at one time bought a huge case. Has 10 5.25 bays. Only problem
is
that you can't use all of them due to cable length limitations.
Multiple controllers?
Onboard IDE controller (pri and sec interface) and a Adaptec 2940 SCSI card.
No, I meant you could use more cont
Travers Buda wrote
The developers need hardware to tackle this.
It may be possible for me to loan out this hardware. Where is it needed,
and for how long?
An private reply is probably better here as to not spam the list.
-ml
Nick Holland wrote:
The amd64 4G issue is a limitation of the platform...at the moment. It
is being worked on, slowly, but there be dragons, and they all have to
be slain.
Nick.
I see. Just for my personal reference, was this limitation documented
somewhere (just want to make sure I didn't mis
* Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-11 20:47:47]:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 02:04:20PM -0800, Mike Larkin wrote:
> > 8-way amd64 (Intel quad Xeon x 2) with 16GB ram. The BIOS and bootloader
> > correctly see all 16gb, but the kernel only sees 4.00GB (a very
> > non-random amount, ind
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 02:04:20PM -0800, Mike Larkin wrote:
>> 8-way amd64 (Intel quad Xeon x 2) with 16GB ram. The BIOS and bootloader
>> correctly see all 16gb, but the kernel only sees 4.00GB (a very
>> non-random amount, indicating to me an artificial limit is being
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 12:37:59PM -0700, Steve B wrote:
> I have one of these, http://calpc.com/catalog/mid_tower.html, and its quite
> beefy.
>
I wonder if you could measure two things for me:
1. The thickness of the steel panels (not of any structural frame).
I'm comparing these with nor
looks like you didn't rebuild config...
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html
On Feb 11, 2008 5:47 PM, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to upgrade from 4.2-release to -current. I am following:
> http://openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html
>
> I did:
>
> cd /usr
>
> export [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 08:01:35PM -0500, Steve Shockley wrote:
> >Yes, I too at one time bought a huge case. Has 10 5.25 bays. Only problem
> >is
> >that you can't use all of them due to cable length limitations.
> Multiple controllers?
> >>I have one of these, http://calpc.com/catalog/mid_tower
On 2008/02/12 12:47, Chris wrote:
> I am trying to upgrade from 4.2-release to -current. I am following:
> http://openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html
You missed 5.3.2
I am trying to upgrade from 4.2-release to -current. I am following:
http://openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html
I did:
cd /usr
export [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs
cvs -d$CVSROOT checkout -P src
cvs -d$CVSROOT up -Pd
cd /usr/src/sys/arch/i386/conf
config GENERIC
config GENERIC gives me the following error:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 02:04:20PM -0800, Mike Larkin wrote:
> 8-way amd64 (Intel quad Xeon x 2) with 16GB ram. The BIOS and bootloader
> correctly see all 16gb, but the kernel only sees 4.00GB (a very
> non-random amount, indicating to me an artificial limit is being imposed
> somewhere). Just
>> Yes, I too at one time bought a huge case. Has 10 5.25 bays. Only problem
>> is
>> that you can't use all of them due to cable length limitations.
>
> Multiple controllers?
Onboard IDE controller (pri and sec interface) and a Adaptec 2940 SCSI card.
>
>>> I have one of these, http://calpc.com
Yes, I too at one time bought a huge case. Has 10 5.25 bays. Only problem is
that you can't use all of them due to cable length limitations.
Multiple controllers?
I have one of these, http://calpc.com/catalog/mid_tower.html, and its quite
beefy.
Their web site lists that it can take *one* h
I don't have a nice thing to say about compaq.
They were odd, drivers were hard to find, they would deliberately
do things to force propriatary solutions: E.g. In the '486 days
they would use a different pin-out on their simms. Compaq memory
wouldn't work in anything else. Non-compaq memory
Hi all
Is there any way to force ospfd to use routes with a lower-cost metric?
"ospfctl reload" doesn't work, it still sends packets via a route with a
higher cost metric than what is possible with another route. Only
restarting the ospfd daemon will make it use the proper routes again.
Any
On 2/10/08, Xavier Millihs-Lacroix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want add one or several serial / rs232 connectors on a OpenBSD box
> (Soekris or standard PC) - without adding a PCI card - just converter.
> I search compatibles products. When we buy product we don't know the chip.
>
> D
Mike Larkin wrote:
After being away from OpenBSD for about 2 years, I recently decided to
take another look at it for a server I am deploying. The machine is a
8-way amd64 (Intel quad Xeon x 2) with 16GB ram. The BIOS and bootloader
correctly see all 16gb, but the kernel only sees 4.00GB (a ver
The ipmi wait is normal in that release. Completly unrelated to the sd
thing.
On Feb 11, 2008, at 3:04 PM, Beavis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
system is still good after I cvsup to -stable. my only concern is
during bootup it takes around 1min. on the part that says "ipmi0 at
mainbus0" but i gu
My 1750s sit on the IPMI probe as well, but I don't think it's
abnormal. I've also experienced the :sd0 not queued" hang and it's a
serious problem as CARP doesn't failover. The only workaround I've
found is to check userspace from another box and force failover.
On Feb 12, 2008 7:04 AM, Beavis <[
After being away from OpenBSD for about 2 years, I recently decided to
take another look at it for a server I am deploying. The machine is a
8-way amd64 (Intel quad Xeon x 2) with 16GB ram. The BIOS and bootloader
correctly see all 16gb, but the kernel only sees 4.00GB (a very
non-random amount
system is still good after I cvsup to -stable. my only concern is
during bootup it takes around 1min. on the part that says "ipmi0 at
mainbus0" but i guess this is minimal as long as it doesn't spit out
that sd0 error again.
dmesg | grep mainbus0 shows:
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: AT/28
If anyone is interested, I have five of the cases at the following website for
sale.
http://www.kevla.org/cases
Jay
> I have one of these, http://calpc.com/catalog/mid_tower.html, and its quite
> beefy.
Yes, I too at one time bought a huge case. Has 10 5.25 bays. Only problem is
that you can't use all of them due to cable length limitations.
With SCSI2, could use up to 4 prior to exceeding 36 inch cable limit. Then
could use two more for IDE. But the other 4, never could use.
J
> I have one of
What I've heard is that the site will be back up with new owners asap.
/Markus
Fredrik Carlsson wrote:
Edd Barrett gmail.com> writes:
hey,
what happened to ports.openbsd.nu?.
The owner forgot to renew it and I can't reach him, so the site has moved to
http://openports.se
Regards
Fredrik
I have one of these, http://calpc.com/catalog/mid_tower.html, and its quite
beefy.
Update:
I've upgraded the BIOS and PERC 5/i (integrated) on my Dell PE 1950.
Old BIOS: 1.5.1
New BIOS: 2.1.1
PERC 5/i OLD: 5.1.1-0040
PERC 5/i NEW: 5.2.1-0067
I've extracted a 126M file, before it completely hangs sd0, but as of
the moment I was able to complete the extraction. I'll do some
Jay Hart wrote:
> Chris,
>
...
>
> I do receive emails from the machine, but they are not being
> delivered properly.
>
> Here is what I get when I receive one:
>
> Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details
> From: "Mail Delivery Subsystem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, February 11, 200
Chris,
I tried the aliases approach, but didn't get any output from mail on my router
for two months, Then one day, about 200 messages came spooling out. Now I get
messages whenever.
/etc/mail/aliases
root: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I do receive emails from the machine, but they are not being delivered
On 2008/02/11 12:36, Jay Hart wrote:
> Henning,
>
> You are right, it is ~/.forward
>
> Any suggestions?
look in maillog
On Feb 11, 2008 8:55 AM, Jay Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Regardless, I can't seem to get mail forwarding working. The two main openbsd
> books say all I need to do is create a .forwarding file and give the name of
> the email address to forward to, but for two months not one email was
> forwa
Henning,
You are right, it is ~/.forward
Any suggestions?
> * Jay Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-11 17:58]:
>> Regardless, I can't seem to get mail forwarding working. The two main
>> openbsd
>> books say all I need to do is create a .forwarding file and give the name of
>> the email address
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Jay Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-11 17:58]:
Regardless, I can't seem to get mail forwarding working. The two main openbsd
books say all I need to do is create a .forwarding file and give the name of
the email address to forward to, but for two months not one email wa
* Jay Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-11 17:58]:
> Regardless, I can't seem to get mail forwarding working. The two main openbsd
> books say all I need to do is create a .forwarding file and give the name of
> the email address to forward to, but for two months not one email was
> forwarded.
it
I am using openbsd 4.0. I have a standard non-X install, setup as a
router/firewall NATing several boxes. I am port forwarding 25 and 80 to a
single box behind the firewall.
So, I do not have sendmail per se running on the openbsd box, but local mail
is working. Not sure I have the proper termin
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 11:17:35AM +0100, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 11:20:31AM -0500, Calomel wrote:
>> Raimo,
>>
>> Can you use the spamd.alloweddomains to whitelist email addresses and
>> domains you accept mail for? Any email sent to your mail server that is not
>> on the l
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 04:34:18AM -0800, Manuel Ravasio wrote:
Hey there,
> Ok, I did understand THAT.
> What I'm still missing is the relationship (if any) between a couple of
> hashes and a possible breach in OBSD...
Well, if the guy genuinely had an exploit and wanted to keep the
mechanism
On Monday 11 February 2008, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> 'Mail From: <>'
One of several that will put you on the http://rfc-ignorant.org/
blacklist.
--
Chris
On Feb 11, 2008 2:07 PM, Julian Leyh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 20:41 Sun 10 Feb , Edd Barrett wrote:
> > Now try on a sparc64 and see what happens.
>
> in case he doesn't have one, here the output on sparc64:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ od -x helloWorld.class |head -n 1
> 000 cafe
Didi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What do you guys think of this?
There's not enough data to say much one way or the other, really.
Those hashes do not provide sufficient data to recreate the files they
were made from, they're only checksums of a kind that's hard to fake.
Then again, a general
On Feb 11, 2008 1:34 PM, Manuel Ravasio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I'm still missing is the relationship (if any) between a couple of
> hashes and a possible breach in OBSD...
Supposedly these are the hashes of tarball containing exploit
code/binary for a security hole in OpenSSH shipped
:-D
Ok, I did understand THAT.
What I'm still missing is the relationship (if any) between a couple of hashes
and a possible breach in OBSD...
--
Anyone who cannot cope with mathematics is not fully human.
At best he is a tolerable sub-human who has learned to wear
shoes, bathe, and not make
http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/Trolling
On 2/11/08, Manuel Ravasio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please, forgive my ignorance, but I can't understand the meaning of your post.
> Can you please explain, or point me to some useful link in order to
> understand the issue?
>
> Thanks,
> Manuel
>
Please, forgive my ignorance, but I can't understand the meaning of your post.
Can you please explain, or point me to some useful link in order to understand
the issue?
Thanks,
Manuel
--
Anyone who cannot cope with mathematics is not fully human.
At best he is a tolerable sub-human who has lear
On Feb 11, 2008 9:06 AM, Didi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SHA1(screwtheo.tar)=ad1bc1f05afa2cc3ccadb18fabb985394c02ce8d
> MD5(screwtheo.tar)= cee67df76eaa0706e666cd5c0b8b711c
>
> OpenSSH exploit for linux
> SHA1(screwtheo_linux.tar)=cb6816de43df87193050a497a83cd8f7ab721fbd
> MD5(screwtheo_linux.tar
Hello,
There are some kits (with DB9 connector / RS232) that can follow up to 4
sensors for $ 40-45 / 30 .
It 's very fast to built it.
You get one mesure per second on the /dev/ttyX
And after you can use rrdtool to have nive graphs.
Regards.
Xavier
2008/2/11, Bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 11:20:31AM -0500, Calomel wrote:
> Raimo,
>
> Can you use the spamd.alloweddomains to whitelist email addresses and
> domains you accept mail for? Any email sent to your mail server that is not
> on the list will only goto spamd and never get the chance to be
> greylisted/w
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 11:19:06AM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
>
> >Now I am trying to improve the Greyscanner. I noticed it did not
> >trap hosts using an empty envelope sender, unless there were
> >more than one entry from that host. I regarded it as a
Didi a icrit :
> Hey
>
> What do you guys think of this?
>
> >From http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/487824 :
> <8---
> OpenBSD 4.1 sshd remote root exploit (on the default install!):
>
> SHA1(screwtheo.tar)=ad1bc1f05afa2cc3ccadb18fabb985394c02ce8d
> MD5(screwtheo.tar)= cee67df76ea
On 2008/02/11 10:40, Badbanchi Hossein wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to install OpenBSD 4.2 on a HP Compaq dc7800. After the
> installation is complete, ifconfig doesn't show any NICs other than lo0
> and enc0.
>
> The output of dmesg has a line:
> vendor "Intel", unknown product 0x10bd (class networ
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 10:40:55AM +0100, Badbanchi Hossein wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to install OpenBSD 4.2 on a HP Compaq dc7800. After the
> installation is complete, ifconfig doesn't show any NICs other than lo0
> and enc0.
>
> The output of dmesg has a line:
> vendor "Intel", unknown product
Hi,
I am trying to install OpenBSD 4.2 on a HP Compaq dc7800. After the
installation is complete, ifconfig doesn't show any NICs other than lo0
and enc0.
The output of dmesg has a line:
vendor "Intel", unknown product 0x10bd (class network subclass ethernet,
rev 0x02) at pci0 dev 25 function 0 not
Hey
What do you guys think of this?
>From http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/487824 :
<8---
OpenBSD 4.1 sshd remote root exploit (on the default install!):
SHA1(screwtheo.tar)=ad1bc1f05afa2cc3ccadb18fabb985394c02ce8d
MD5(screwtheo.tar)= cee67df76eaa0706e666cd5c0b8b711c
OpenSSH e
On 20:41 Sun 10 Feb , Edd Barrett wrote:
> Now try on a sparc64 and see what happens.
in case he doesn't have one, here the output on sparc64:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ od -x helloWorld.class |head -n 1
000 cafebabe0031001d0a0006000f09
Regards,
Julian
--
On Sun, Feb 10 2008 at 23:03, Chris Jones wrote:
> Thanks for the advice I will look into that should the gif option not work.
> Do you have any advice as to how to run gif over ipsec?
Sorry I don't have any clue to setup gif tunneling with a Fortinet end
point. Between 2 OpenBSD boxes it's quite
59 matches
Mail list logo
