I tried googling for real-time computing with OpenBSD and all I found
was reference to RTMX.
In http://openbsd.org/products.html, it read: They (RTMX) have
graciously donated the source code for these extensions, and these
changes will be integrated into OpenBSD soon.
In http://archives.neohapsis.c
I have created some code in lm78.c to handle the W83792D watchdog portion
of the chip. A diff is pasted at the end of this message. There is one
problem with it though. Under OpenBSD 4.1, if sysctl.kern.period is set to
anything other than 0 while sysctl.kern.auto is set to 1, after a few
seconds
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 18:24:35 +0100, "Stefan Olsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Dear Misc,
>
> I am pulling my hairs out, the last few days I've been trying to install
> OpenBSD on my Dell Latitude D510. I've disabled the internal wireless
> BCM card and instead put in a Netgear WPN511. -First I tr
Dear Misc,
I am pulling my hairs out, the last few days I've been trying to install
OpenBSD on my Dell Latitude D510. I've disabled the internal wireless
BCM card and instead put in a Netgear WPN511. -First I tried 4.1 release
which meant I had to download the firmware to get it recognized but it
Timo Schoeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to speed up SSL/TLS connections to my tiny WRAP-based [0] server
> However, the used AMD Geode LX CPU also features a 'Crypto
> Unit', but from AMD's Data Book on this CPU [0] I don't get the idea
> whether it also accellerates RSA operations or
Timo Schoeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for your reply; alternatively, I could use an Alix board for
> this task (faster CPU than WRAP, 500MHz vs. 233MHz and newer core
> design). However, the used AMD Geode LX CPU also features a 'Crypto
> Unit', but from AMD's Data Book on this CPU [0]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Thus Darrin Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake on Sun, 30 Sep
2007 07:29:43 -0700:
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 02:13:24PM +0200, Timo Schoeler wrote:
> > Is there anyone using the *newer* boards, vpn1401 and vpn1411
> > (Hi/fn 7955 security accelerato
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 02:13:24PM +0200, Timo Schoeler wrote:
> Is there anyone using the *newer* boards, vpn1401 and vpn1411 (Hi/fn
> 7955 security accelerator chip) [3], successfully (I found some people
> reporting weird behaviour with these boards [4])?
> [3] -- http://www.soekris.com/vpn140
Looking at you acpi-enabled GENERIC.MP dmesg, there are a lot of scary
messages:
> acpimadt0: unknown apic structure type ff
> acpimadt0: unknown apic structure type ff
> acpimadt0: unknown apic structure type ff
> acpi device at acpi0 from table OEMB not configured
> acpi device at acpi0 from tab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi list,
I'd like to speed up SSL/TLS connections to my tiny WRAP-based [0]
server; from what I got from the net, Soekris vpn1201 and vpn1211 are
'discontinued' (those use a Hi/fn 7951 security accelerator chip) [1],
but are listed as supported by
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 11:28:59AM +0159, Han Boetes wrote:
> ~% grep usb /etc/fstab
> /dev/sd0i /mnt/usb msdos rw,nodev,nosuid,noauto,noexec0 0
> ~% grep usb /etc/exports
> /mnt/usb -maproot=han:nfs marsupilami
> ~% mount |grep usb
> /dev/sd0i on /mnt/usb type msdos (NFS exported
Alexander Hall wrote:
> The problem is that nfs shares does not traverse file system
> mount points once initialized. Since nfs probably was started
> prior to mounting the msdos partition (with the noauto option in
> /etc/fstab), nfs would only share the contents of the mount
> point directory its
I will be in Kiev from 4.10 to 9.10 and I have four 4.1 CDs from Wim. Maybe
somebody still need it, at least as a souvenir? ;)
13 matches
Mail list logo
