On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 15:00 +0200, Marius Hooge wrote:
> Of course I did.. I just replaced the PSU with a spare one i got lying
> around. - It didn't work out. (Can a PSU even cause such errors?)
A failing PSU is perhaps the least obvious hardware failure of all,
because it looks like some combin
Tom Van Looy wrote:
Oke, problem solved. But, why doesn't this flag get set implicitly when
using a command with ssh?
Because it's not 8bit-clean, the tty layer can change the data. It's
usually ok for text, but it messes up binary data so having it on all
the time would make ssh pipelines a
On 7/1/07, Matthew Szudzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a usb flash drive that I wish to reformat as an MS-DOS (FAT) file
system. How do I do that on OpenBSD?
I want the drive to be formatted in the same manner that a Windows machine
or Macintosh might format an MS-DOS file system. So cle
Because it is not necessarily needed, tty allocation may require other tasks
like logging the user to wtmp* or creating job control and you may only need
to run the command and get the result as if it where a file to read from.
Btw, you can use the ssh's " -T " to log into a server and not to be
n
On Sunday 01 July 2007 19:58, Camiel Dobbelaar wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Jul 2007, Chris Cohen wrote:
> > according to http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/ftp.html i've setup ftp-proxy
> > and changed my pf.conf. A client on the extern interface of the firewall
> > can upload files, use passive and active mode.
Matthew Szudzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a usb flash drive that I wish to reformat as an MS-DOS (FAT) file
> system. How do I do that on OpenBSD?
You probably want to look into newfs_msdos.
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://www.blug.l
So...
Has anybody checked how much traffic you can push through a net5501
serving as an IPsec gateway?
Has anybody tried a vpn1411 in a net5501 yet?
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a usb flash drive that I wish to reformat as an MS-DOS (FAT) file
system. How do I do that on OpenBSD?
I want the drive to be formatted in the same manner that a Windows machine
or Macintosh might format an MS-DOS file system. So clearly, I don't want
to use disklabel, since OpenBSD di
On 7/1/07, Alden Pierre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello All,
I'm having a hard time trying to install packages on my machine.
1. PKG_PATH=ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/4.1/packages/i386/
2. pkg_add -i screen gives me the following:
sh: cannot create /var/tmp/pkgout.V6
On Sunday 01 July 2007 18:14, Chris Cohen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> according to http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/ftp.html i've setup ftp-proxy
> and changed my pf.conf. A client on the extern interface of the firewall
> can upload files, use passive and active mode. But fxp transfers (server to
> server) does
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007, Chris Cohen wrote:
> according to http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/ftp.html i've setup ftp-proxy and
> changed my pf.conf. A client on the extern interface of the firewall can
> upload files, use passive and active mode. But fxp transfers (server to
> server) doesn't work. My ft
On 2007/07/01 18:14, Chris Cohen wrote:
> Doesn't ftp-proxy support fxp transvers in reverse mode?
"The negotiated IP address for active modes is ignored for security rea-
sons. This makes third party file transfers impossible."
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> On 03/22/2007 03:17:00 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> > One thing to watch out for with binat: you can't use it with
> > ftp-proxy(8), since binat is of higher priority than the rdr or
> > nat rules which are added to the anchor. The workaround there
> >
Hello All,
I'm having a hard time trying to install packages on my machine.
1. PKG_PATH=ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/4.1/packages/i386/
2. pkg_add -i screen gives me the following:
sh: cannot create /var/tmp/pkgout.V6ybCkITOgB: File exists
No packages available
Hi,
according to http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/ftp.html i've setup ftp-proxy and
changed my pf.conf. A client on the extern interface of the firewall can
upload files, use passive and active mode. But fxp transfers (server to
server) doesn't work. My ftpserver (vsftpd) on the host behind the fi
Hello,
thanks for everyone, the mount problem was solved, the msdos partition #
was sd0i .
I install the bash with pkg_add bash-3.2.tgz, it was failed, I got
following error message:
Not an ustar archive header at /usr/libdata/perl5/OpenBSD/ustar.pm line
114.
what is the problem of me? many thank
> Perhaps someone more experienced can comment on this one. I'm not
> exactly sure, but i suspect you found nothing for the following simple
> reason: if all you want to do is checking for simple path traversal
> under Unix, m/^\// and m/\.\./ are all you need.
Except that it would make valid nam
Alexander Hall wrote:
> Then `disklabel -E sd0x` and add a partition of type MSDOS with the
For the records; Should be `disklabel -E sd0`
/Alexander
On 7/1/07, Alexander Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alex Kwan wrote:
> my OpenBSD hard disk have a msdos partition, but it has no
> partition number like sd0x, (my system's partition no. was from
> Sd0a to Sd0g) how can I mount it or put it into fstab? thanks!
First, do `fdisk sd0` and locate t
J.C. Roberts wrote on Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 12:46:02PM -0700:
> The unarj v2.43 archiver we have for use with clamav virus scanning does
> not really work. The same is true for the newer 2.65 version released
> by the author. The problem is unarj is unable to extract with paths,
> hence it will o
Alexander Hall wrote:
> Well, a slash in the beginning of path names made me overwrite my entire
> /etc dir with another machines configuration... However, that was with
> tar and not unarj...
Correcting myself after some testing. It was using pax. :-)
/Alexander
Alex Kwan wrote:
> my OpenBSD hard disk have a msdos partition, but it has no
> partition number like sd0x, (my system's partition no. was from
> Sd0a to Sd0g) how can I mount it or put it into fstab? thanks!
First, do `fdisk sd0` and locate the boundaries of the msdos file system.
Then `disklabe
Nick Guenther wrote:
> On 6/29/07, J.C. Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The unarj v2.43 archiver we have for use with clamav virus scanning does
>> not really work. The same is true for the newer 2.65 version released
>> by the author. The problem is unarj is unable to extract with paths,
>>
Is books.html falling behind?
FYI, from looking at a few books i suspect the following:
- "Building Linux and OpenBSD Firewalls" describes OpenBSD 2.5 and
IPFilter...
- "Computer Networks" does not refer to the latest edition (ISBN
0130661023 is edition 4)
Of course there could be other useful f
On 6/29/07, J.C. Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The unarj v2.43 archiver we have for use with clamav virus scanning does
not really work. The same is true for the newer 2.65 version released
by the author. The problem is unarj is unable to extract with paths,
hence it will overwrite files and
hello,
my OpenBSD hard disk have a msdos partition, but it has no
partition number like sd0x, (my system's partition no. was from
Sd0a to Sd0g) how can I mount it or put it into fstab? thanks!
Oke, problem solved. But, why doesn't this flag get set implicitly when
using a command with ssh?
Chris Cohen wrote:
On Saturday 30 June 2007 19:31, Tom Van Looy wrote:
Hi
Today I used sudo as command to ssh and it echoed my sudo password.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]
$ ssh soekris sudo pfctl -s sta
On 2007/06/30 20:23, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> For the rest, just give each domain name/user
> their own httpd instance running with its own config, its own unix user, and
> its own IP address.
Or use different ports and proxy them based on host headers rather
than burning
On Saturday, June 30, 2007 at 21:54:00 -0500, Aaron wrote:
>That sounds good, and i read http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade41.html
>about upgrading, and http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Release
>
>When following stable with the method described in the faq, i didn't
>notice anything about "fin
Lyndon Nerenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Well, that is exactly what I want to do. I use the system passwords
>> for imap anyway, so why not? Of course, the channel must be protected
>> by SSL/TLS when you do that.
>
>Because there are a large number of IMAP clients that are not aware of
>LO
30 matches
Mail list logo
