i've finally begun to receive enough spam at a domain of mine that i'm ready to
implement spamd. one of our contacts in is china and it's critical that we not
block or unduly defer his emails. i expect that there is a way to ensure
"appropriate" behavior in spamd.
the MX record for our contact's c
Hi,
After follow the instructions from the FAQ 5.3.5 the system returns:
# *rm -rf /usr/obj/**
# *cd /usr/src*
# *make obj
*# *cd /usr/src/etc && env DESTDIR=/ make distrib-dirs
*# *cd /usr/src*
# make build
cd /usr/src/share/mk && exec make install
install -c -o root -g bin -m 444 bsd.READ
> Anyone have a clever hack to get sftp chroot'ed too?
In my original post to this thread, i mentioned
http://sublimation.org/scponly/wiki
Disclaimed: I neither tested nor audited scponly.
A port has just been submitted to ports@ (not by me).
But also i want to get my wep encryption so thats why i want to use
kismet can i do that with tpcdump hostapd??
Reyk Floeter escribis:
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 08:54:42AM -0700, Carlos A. Garcia G. wrote:
is OBSD able to put a cisco aironet card in rfmon, i want to run kismet
and some oth
> On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 03:55:49AM +0200, Soner Tari wrote:
> > I'm planning to purchase a motherboard with SiS 661FX/964 chipset. Can I
> > assume sis(4) driver on OpenBSD 4.0 amd64 supports the ethernet on SiS
> > 964? (In other words, sis(4) mentions SiS 900, does it mean 9xx?)
> >
> > Thanks
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 03:55:49AM +0200, Soner Tari wrote:
> I'm planning to purchase a motherboard with SiS 661FX/964 chipset. Can I
> assume sis(4) driver on OpenBSD 4.0 amd64 supports the ethernet on SiS
> 964? (In other words, sis(4) mentions SiS 900, does it mean 9xx?)
>
> Thanks,
The recen
Original message
>Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 10:24:02 -0500
>From: Jim Razmus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: SFTP only access to sshd
>To: misc@openbsd.org
>
>>
>> Actually, this is already implemented.
>>
>> ssh -v somehost:
>>
>> debug1: Remote: Forced command:
>>
>> Of course,
* Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061125 06:56]:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 03:06:32PM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> > In some situations, just executing /bin/sh -c ,
> > regardless of the command supplied to the sshd(8), certainly is
> > the best thing to do. In this speacial case, returning
On 25/11/06, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
viq wrote:
> /usr/src/sys/dev/acpi/acpimadt.c:131: warning: implicit declaration of
> Any ideas how to deal with that?
-acpimadt* at acpi?
-acpiprt* at acpi?
+#acpimadt* at acpi?
+#acpiprt* at acpi?
This is not "finished" ye
viq wrote:
/usr/src/sys/dev/acpi/acpimadt.c:131: warning: implicit declaration of
Any ideas how to deal with that?
-acpimadt* at acpi?
-acpiprt* at acpi?
+#acpimadt* at acpi?
+#acpiprt* at acpi?
This is not "finished" yet. (in-tree development)
-Robert
* Gustavo Rios wrote:
> i am planning to write a software system and would like to release it
> for the community. But, i would like to promote, some how, people
> usage of OpenBSD operating system, no one else.
>
> My ideia is to elaborate a license that allows only for openbsd
> installation to
I'm trying to compile a kernel with ACPI enabled, and with sources
checked out last evening and i386 snapshot from 20th Nov it fails with
the following error:
/.. -DDDB -DDIAGNOSTIC -DKTRACE -DACCOUNTING -DKMEMSTATS -DPTRACE
-DCRYPTO -DSYSVMSG -DSYSVSEM -DSYSVSHM -DUVM_SWAP_ENCRYPT -DCOMPAT_35
-D
> I can think of several possibilities as to why some negotiations are taking
> more than 60 seconds. For instance:
>
> (1) The Cisco 7301 may be slow to respond. It does have a VAM2+ crypto
> accelerator installed, but I don't know if it's used for isakmp exchanges,
> or just for symmetric encryp
Just a heads up, we are one week away from OpenCon in Venice next weekend 2/3
December 2006. The only conference entirely dedicated to OpenBSD and it's free
too!
Visit http://www.opencon.org/ for info.
The program: http://www.opencon.org/program.php
We've had many registrations from strange an
Hello misc@,
I put together a script, which builds OpenBSD inside a chroot.
Since it took me quite some time to figure out a couple of pitfalls (see
below) I thought I'd just share it. Perhaps somebody finds it usefull
and/or can _please_ give me feedback.
READ THE SCRIPT BEFORE USING IT!
Why bu
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 03:06:32PM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> In some situations, just executing /bin/sh -c ,
> regardless of the command supplied to the sshd(8), certainly is
> the best thing to do. In this speacial case, returning an error
> message in case of a command mismatch might even be
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 04:49:00PM +0500, Igor Goldenberg wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a question about RAIDframe driver (using in RAID1 mode).
>
> GENERIC kernel doesn't support it, so it's need to compile custom
> kernel. As described in FAQ it's not recommended. Also additional
> complexity for
being new with this topic I followed the instructions in
http://www.eclectica.ca/howto/openbsd-software-raid-howto.php
Everything worked until I tried to mount /dev/raid0a /mnt (for changing the
entries for the disks in /etc/raid0.conf)
I got the message device busy
so I changed the entries in /
Depends what you mean by "handle". I would expect each target on the
bus to be 'discovered' by each adapter during the probe process. Thus
giving you a choice in how to access the target. There is no code I
know of that tries to organize the resulting confusion. So if you are really
careful it may
19 matches
Mail list logo
