Never mind all.
As I sent this away, everyting suddenly came right.
Who knows?
Cheers
> -Original Message-
> From: Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu
> Sent: 14 March 2006 08:07 AM
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: trouble with lists
>
>
> Anyone else having trouble reading lists or op
Anyone else having trouble reading lists or opening www.openbsd.org?
For some reason i cannot even open the web page no matter what pc i try,
from home or work.
If anyone has an idea please email me privately since i cannot see the
list.
Thanks
Marius Van Deventer
Computer Technician
Byt
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 00:30:46 -0500, "STeve Andre'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I just upated my src tree and built a new kernel. The system works
>(I can ssh to my laptop), but X is dead and I can't switch to a text
>console. I tried this twice with the same results. Reverting to my
>previou
I just upated my src tree and built a new kernel. The system works
(I can ssh to my laptop), but X is dead and I can't switch to a text
console. I tried this twice with the same results. Reverting to my
previous kernel of the 7th returned the laptop to normal. So, heads
up.
--STeve Andre'
Nick Guenther wrote:
>
> Well, like was said, you lack fdisk and disklabel output. However, did
> you remember to mark the partition active? Also, you might have just
> messed up in disklabelling but I can't see how (unless you somehow put
> wd0a onto a part of the disk that gets overwritten for so
On 3/13/06, Chris Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Misc,
>
> I want to leave the pre-loaded Windows XP on the X40, so I:
>
> a) didn't let it convert to NTFS
> b) deleted the "IBM/Lenovo utility partition"
> c) resized part 0 (C)
> d) using OpenBSD install fdisk, created an OpenBSD partition
Theo de Raadt wrote:
> We've just finished building the 3.9 release, and will soon
> start making -current snapshots available again.
>
> Hold on.
All right. Many thanks, especially for the quick reply.
On 3/13/06, Danilo Piazzalunga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to install a snapshot of the upcoming 3.9 release, and I was
> expecting to find the relevant files in the /pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/i386
> directory, but that directory is empty (albeit present) on most mirrors
> (ftp
Danilo Piazzalunga wrote:
Am I missing something? Are snapshot not available anymore?
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#NoSnaps
On 2006/03/14 00:01, Ramiro Aceves wrote:
> When I first discover OpenBSD after some years using Linux, I got in
> love with it, I liked its philosophy very much, its correctness, its
> documentation, the way the kernel boots, Everything is where you spect
> it to be.
Follow the cvs-changes and po
> Am I missing something? Are snapshot not available anymore?
We've just finished building the 3.9 release, and will soon
start making -current snapshots available again.
Hold on.
> > I have tested it in two very different machines and It fails as soon
> > as you format a cell.
>
> no, my laptop runs -current.
Oh great, it means that they have fixed it!
>
> > It is not "every possible combination of program and input", it is a
> > failure that appears as soon as you format
If you don't mind me chiming in, my disks arn't nearly as slow, but I
expected them to be faster. Can anybody make a recommendation to
improve my disk i/o, or confirm the speeds I get are about right? This
is the first machine I've had thats U320 SCSI-capable.
raid0 is a mirror of two scsi disks:
Hello,
I would like to install a snapshot of the upcoming 3.9 release, and I was
expecting to find the relevant files in the /pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/i386
directory, but that directory is empty (albeit present) on most mirrors
(ftp.openbsd.org, ftp.de.openbsd.org, ftp.unina.it, openbsd.mirrors.tds.n
Hello
>
> Helping is done with cash donations and diffs. Being an buttplug is not.
I do not have enough money to make donations, I have contributed
buying a CD set. I think it is insignificant and not too much but it
is the only thing I can afford. I am not capable of sending any diffs.
Not eve
> I differ a bit. If the port were removed, there'd be even less incentive
> to work to fix it in future. But, if testing shows it doesn't work, it
> should be marked as BROKEN for releases, yes. Now, wrt testing, it
> applies what others said: Everyone is asked to contribute, even if the
> contrib
Chris Paul wrote:
> Now, after creating slice a, the OpenBSD disklabel does not do the math
> for me. It give me the same beginning offset as for wd0a. So I then: did
> the math (added all the offsets & created the partitions), but now it
> won't boot (it just goes ahead and boots XP).
Show us
Dear Misc,
I want to leave the pre-loaded Windows XP on the X40, so I:
a) didn't let it convert to NTFS
b) deleted the "IBM/Lenovo utility partition"
c) resized part 0 (C)
d) using OpenBSD install fdisk, created an OpenBSD partition (above
cylinder 1024).
Now, after creating slice a, the OpenBS
I doing some performance test with openbsd 3.8 in a PowerEdge 830 with
perc 4/sc board.
'dd if=/dev/sd0c of=/home/test1 count=4000 bs=256k' gives a transfer
rate of 6MByte por second. This is really slow... other operating
systems get a throughput of 45 mbyte por second.
Setting Write-policy to W
I wanted to be able to access the web and surf
without the Nazi admin checking the firewall logs
to see what I am doing.
Oh, nice. Figure out how to bypass company security policy and put them all at
risk. Then call the guy who's job it is to keep it all working a Nazi. Mmm,
impressive.
Hope
On Monday 13 March 2006 10:55, you wrote:
> Joachim Schipper wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 09:03:21PM -0300, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> >> Dear folks,
> >>
> >> i live in brazil, and it is a common practice for local
> >> corporation/institutions to monitor our phone calls, internet access
> >> and
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 07:55:47AM -0800, Bryan Brake wrote:
> Joachim Schipper wrote:
> >On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 09:03:21PM -0300, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> >>Dear folks,
> >>
> >>i live in brazil, and it is a common practice for local
> >>corporation/institutions to monitor our phone calls, internet
Raidframe works great, no problems (for me) :)
Adam Papai wrote:
Srebrenko Sehic said:
You're lucky that your RAID1 array even works, since integrated
mirroring (IM) is currently not supported by mpt(4) driver. If it
works, it is slow like hell.
If you want speed, remove the RAID1 array and r
Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 09:03:21PM -0300, Gustavo Rios wrote:
Dear folks,
i live in brazil, and it is a common practice for local
corporation/institutions to monitor our phone calls, internet access
and personal email. I would like to be able to access Internet by
means
Srebrenko Sehic said:
> You're lucky that your RAID1 array even works, since integrated
> mirroring (IM) is currently not supported by mpt(4) driver. If it
> works, it is slow like hell.
>
> If you want speed, remove the RAID1 array and run with 2 normal disks.
>
> On 3/13/06, Adam Papai <[EMAIL PR
You're lucky that your RAID1 array even works, since integrated
mirroring (IM) is currently not supported by mpt(4) driver. If it
works, it is slow like hell.
If you want speed, remove the RAID1 array and run with 2 normal disks.
On 3/13/06, Adam Papai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi misc,
>
> I'
Hi misc,
I've got a problem with the SCSI read/write speed under 3.8.
It has LSILOGIC HW raid adapter running raid1.
The time dd test shows:
astatine[wooh]> time dd if=/dev/zero of=/home/wooh/output bs=1m count=1024
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
1073741824 bytes transferred in 411.637 sec
Hi,
> On 3/8/06, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> But financially we are under strain, and it is not letting us grow any
>> of our bigger plans.
>
> It sounds like you really have big plans. Maybe it is a good idea to
> tell about them, maybe that will make the big companies interested
test. ignore.
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/x-pkcs7-signature which
had a name of smime.p7s]
Ramiro Aceves wrote:
...
Yes, WM also works fine here. But again, it is not a solution. GNOME
should not be released in such buggy state.
I don't follow your logic here.
Ok, let's say GNOME was removed from ports by your suggestion.
In that case, you WOULD need to find another solution.
In th
[IMAGE]
Bem-vindo ao InCards!
Vocj recebeu um cartco postal virtual de [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Poxa, como i difmcil ficar sozinha aqui, viajar pra um pams tco distante
de vocjs, que sco meus amigos a tanto tempo, eu precisei enviar esse
cartco para vocj, porque ss assim, eu vo me sentir melhor, e espe
Hello, this is what I found about the gnome-panel issue on the bugs page:
>Number: 4473
>Category: ports
>Synopsis: gnome-panel freeze and quits on OpenBSD 3.8 current i386
>Confidential: yes
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible:bugs
>State:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 05:54:10PM +0800, Vladan Popovic wrote:
> Yes I read it - many times - trust me.
> But how do I get the shared library - I thought that when I
> configure/make/ it would generate the shared library - apparently not -
> or maybe it needs some special options.
run ./configu
Yes I read it - many times - trust me.
But how do I get the shared library - I thought that when I
configure/make/ it would generate the shared library - apparently not -
or maybe it needs some special options.
That's the point I don't understand the message
If you have an answer it would be grea
34 matches
Mail list logo
