On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Steve Fairhead wrote:
One of my production machines (3.8-stable) has suddenly started
panicing every couple of hours. I found out that the culprit is smbd,
eating through memory like there's no tomorrow (approx. 10Mb /
minute! ). Can't figure out what has triggered it, nothi
On 3/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 11:51:24 -0500, "Jason Crawford"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I am soon going to be getting an Octane with dual R12000SC CPUs. I was
> >wondering how well OpenBSD would work on this computer (I am pretty
> >sure the
panic: ieee80211_newstate: bogus xmit rate 0 setup
Stopped at Debugger+0x4: leave
ddb> ps
PID PPID PGRPUID S FLAGS WAIT COMMAND
5980 22770 22770 0 3 0x4006 biowaithttpd
25714 1 22770 0 3 0x44106 uvn_getsendmailhb
9405 182
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 11:51:24 -0500, "Jason Crawford"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am soon going to be getting an Octane with dual R12000SC CPUs. I was
>wondering how well OpenBSD would work on this computer (I am pretty
>sure there isn't SMP support on the SGI stuff yet) and how much help
>is nee
Hey Chris,
2006/3/11, Chris Kuethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> why would you trust us, and why should we trust you?
I would trust some one else, because there may be some one around
having the same problem and that could trust it for such a matter.
> i'm not saying
> you're evil, i'm just saying tha
Stefek Zaba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll be doing the 'config -e' dance to disable the unwanted
> audio hardware... later... and no, I don't intend running X on this!
What for, your kernel will still be the same size and your laptop does
not seem to have audio(4) hardware anyway.
martin
Unearthed an ancient laptop recently, intending to add it to the collection
of 'near-transparent' logging bridges available. Keen-eyed dmesg readers
will note the massive 16MB of RAM, and the absence of a floppy device
(though the controller is found) - and a Pentium old enough to need the F00F
Dear folks,
i live in brazil, and it is a common practice for local
corporation/institutions to monitor our phone calls, internet access
and personal email. I would like to be able to access Internet by
means of a proxy. My initial ideia is to get some peer (personnel)
outside brazil that would al
> Setting flags on /bsd is not part of the standard install. If you have
> done so, you should be able to fix it yourself.
Ok, I understand what the problem is and this comment triggered my memory.
A while back I was experimenting with different things to harden the system
a bit more. One of t
> Setting flags on /bsd is not part of the standard install. If you have
done so, you should be able to fix it yourself.
Understood.
It seems to be ok, as the new kernel version is reported correctly, but I do
want to do it the correct way.
However, the way listed in the instruction page is no
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006, Mike Loiterman wrote:
> I'm following the instructions at http://openbsd.org/stable/html to upgrade
> to 3.8-stable.
>
> Everything works as it is supposed to until I get to the part where I am
> supposed to copy the newly compiled kernel into /. I execute the command
> and
I followed the steps in that page using sudo, no problems.
On 3/11/06, Mike Loiterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm following the instructions at http://openbsd.org/stable/html to upgrade
> to 3.8-stable.
>
> Everything works as it is supposed to until I get to the part where I am
> supposed to
I'm following the instructions at http://openbsd.org/stable/html to upgrade
to 3.8-stable.
Everything works as it is supposed to until I get to the part where I am
supposed to copy the newly compiled kernel into /. I execute the command
and get this error:
# cp bsd /bsd
cp: /bsd: Operation not
On 3/11/06, Diana Eichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Kevin wrote:
> SNIP
> > Right.
> > Because for-profit businesses wants to see return on their "investment",
> > thus a company will seldom give stuff away because it feels good.
>
> Then you ( the generic you ) needs to do
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 10:21:55 -0800
"Roger Neth Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Roger Neth Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mar 11, 2006 10:19 AM
> Subject: Re: SGI's
> To: Jason Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> On 3/11/06, Jason Crawford <[EMAIL P
-- Forwarded message --
From: Roger Neth Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mar 11, 2006 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: SGI's
To: Jason Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 3/11/06, Jason Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/11/06, Roger Neth Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/11/06, Jason
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Kevin wrote:
SNIP
> Right.
> Because for-profit businesses wants to see return on their "investment",
> thus a company will seldom give stuff away because it feels good.
Then you ( the generic you ) needs to do a better job of explaining to
management the cost savings associat
On 3/11/06, Jason Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/11/06, Roger Neth Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/11/06, Jason Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 3/11/06, Roger Neth Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On 3/11/06, Jason Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > I
On 3/11/06, Roger Neth Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/11/06, Jason Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am soon going to be getting an Octane with dual R12000SC CPUs. I was
> > wondering how well OpenBSD would work on this computer (I am pretty
> > sure there isn't SMP support on the SGI
On 3/11/06, Jason Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am soon going to be getting an Octane with dual R12000SC CPUs. I was
> wondering how well OpenBSD would work on this computer (I am pretty
> sure there isn't SMP support on the SGI stuff yet) and how much help
> is needed in getting the SGI
I am soon going to be getting an Octane with dual R12000SC CPUs. I was
wondering how well OpenBSD would work on this computer (I am pretty
sure there isn't SMP support on the SGI stuff yet) and how much help
is needed in getting the SGI port to work even better.
Jason
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Greg Thomas wrote:
> On 3/10/06, Craig Ryhorchuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > I wouldn't go quite that far. Corporate anywhere cares about charity.
>
> No, they don't care about charity. They care about tax deductions.
> There is a big difference between the two.
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 01:26:25PM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
> > Isn't there any reliable way to detect *what* kind of keyboard is
> > in use and then decide wether the hack in akbd_capslockwrapper()
> > is necessary or not?
>
> No. But what about this diff?
As you note, quite messy, but it works
> Hi,
>
> last weekend, I noticed that after a
>
> $ wsconsctl keyboard.map+="keysym Caps_Lock = Control_L"
>
> on my PowerBook G4 the capslock key did *not* any longer behave
> like a control key. Instead it just has *no* effect at all, which
> isn't very surprising when looking at akbd_capsloc
Hi,
last weekend, I noticed that after a
$ wsconsctl keyboard.map+="keysym Caps_Lock = Control_L"
on my PowerBook G4 the capslock key did *not* any longer behave
like a control key. Instead it just has *no* effect at all, which
isn't very surprising when looking at akbd_capslockwrapper() in
akbd
Ok, so I have two ath devices, one Netgear WAB501 which is an
AR5211-based chip and one Cisco AIR-CB21AG-A-K9 which is AR5212-based.
Originally I had posted that if I set the Cisco to mode 11b I could
connect to my current 802.11b network. For some reason that has
stopped working. I get the foll
26 matches
Mail list logo
