Uwe Dippel wrote:
>
> What I cannot reproduce, though, is the boot problem. Here it installs and
> boots properly (what do you mean with 'Installing the BIOS' ??); also in
> the case with active partition #0. Without any additional biosboot or
> whatsoever.
> Maybe you made a mistake at your offse
Gustavo Rios wrote:
> Dear fellows,
>
> i am in need to write event driven processing applications. I must
> avoid sequential processing. I will be mixing RPC queries and dns
> ones.
>
> I saw, at the first sigh, writing non batch program is very hard to
> accomplish. So i wonder how openbsd mana
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 01:40:19 -0500
Bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake:
> On Sat, 7 Jan 2006 15:39:20 -0500
> Bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake:
>
> > On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 00:42:18 -0500
> > Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake:
> >
> > > Bill wrote:
> > > > I found one of my firewalls has a 4Gig drive.
On Sat, 7 Jan 2006 15:39:20 -0500
Bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake:
> On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 00:42:18 -0500
> Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake:
>
> > Bill wrote:
> > > I found one of my firewalls has a 4Gig drive. While it is still
> > > working fine, I am thinking maybe I should remove the 10
On 1/8/06, Jonathan Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would really appreciate having mergemaster in the base system.
>
Or at least a mention of it in the upgrade FAQ [
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade38.html ]. Even just something like
"Some people find the sysutils/mergemaster port useful f
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
No, if only for the fact that I wasn't aware of its existence until
you mentioned it just now.
The questions is, what *do* people use for updating /etc?
I've been using mergemaster for several years now, it's an essential
tool for me. But then again, I'm perfectly
Nick Holland wrote:
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Nick Holland wrote:
IF there is some reason you have to complete an upgrade in one reboot,
or faster than the local boot media process goes, you might want to try
the above referened footnote [1] below. (and if that sentence doesn't
cure you of this d
Dear fellows,
i am in need to write event driven processing applications. I must
avoid sequential processing. I will be mixing RPC queries and dns
ones.
I saw, at the first sigh, writing non batch program is very hard to
accomplish. So i wonder how openbsd manages when there are n process,
for in
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> Nick Holland wrote:
>
>> IF there is some reason you have to complete an upgrade in one reboot,
>> or faster than the local boot media process goes, you might want to try
>> the above referened footnote [1] below. (and if that sentence doesn't
>> cure you of this delusion
Julien,
On 09/01/2006, at 1:10 PM, Julien Bonastre wrote:
The guy is delusional and has NO basis for his argument.
I think your response here (along with the rest) is exaggerated.
Don't worry mate, you've got your head screwed on right. This guy
Graham still goes to work in a horse and car
I hear you well and clear.
The guy is delusional and has NO basis for his argument.
He is probably just an amateur and has been burnt downloading what he
thought was a Virtual Sex 3D game which turned out to be some infected
trojan/spy ware
Tough.
BT is one of the most revolutionary techn
On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 15:09:19 -0500, MySHOP wrote:
> I have Tyan Tomcat i7230A (S5160)
>
> But OpenBSD can not install
This is no proper error report. Can you describe what you did and where it
stopped ? That's the only way to help you.
Uwe
Our firm may have the bandwidth, but I have to check with operations.
Will reply in full on Monday. We use obsd somewhere in most of our
client and our own networks and are very interested in issues related
to virtualization.
CU
Chet Uber
President and Chief Scientist
SecurityPosture, Inc.
Nick Holland wrote:
IF there is some reason you have to complete an upgrade in one reboot,
or faster than the local boot media process goes, you might want to try
the above referened footnote [1] below. (and if that sentence doesn't
cure you of this delusion that I always write efficiently, con
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
[snip some stuff too flattering to repeat]
> But reading it, got me thinking to one small section Nick put int there
> and if I learn something over time about Nick's writing is that even
> small step that you could very easily overlook are there for a reason
> and they wer
List,
I am running 3.8 GENERIC on i386 and can't figure out why pf isn't
logging the packets I've told it to, here is a snippet from /etc/
pf.conf...
ext_if="tun0"
int_if="rl0"
lan_net = "192.168.1.0/24"
rfc1918 = "{ 127.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16, 10.0.0.0/8 }"
set block-polic
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 00:13:32 +0100, Alexander Farber wrote:
>Hi,
>
>why do I get this warning in /var/log/daemon:
>
>dhcpd: Multiple interfaces match the same shared network: re0 ral0
>
>even though the dhcpd seems to work (ok, my WLAN over ral0 is unstable,
>but I'm not sure if this dhcpd warn
On 1/9/06, Alexander Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's actually meant by "shared network" and why is it bad (is it somehow
> related to broadcasts?). The ifconfig shows my cards being on 2
> different networks:
As mentioned in dhcpd.conf(5), a shared network is a set of (logical)
networks
Hi,
why do I get this warning in /var/log/daemon:
dhcpd: Multiple interfaces match the same shared network: re0 ral0
even though the dhcpd seems to work (ok, my WLAN over ral0 is unstable,
but I'm not sure if this dhcpd warning is related to that problem):
dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 192.168
du wolltest doch ein bild von mir sehen, oder?
hier ist es!
http://www.traumkontaktchat.de/sendSMS.php?uid=591
und entspreche ich deinen erwartungen?
hoffe du bist nicht enttduscht ...
deine amy.
Christian Weisgerber wrote on Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 02:46:51PM +:
> The questions is, what *do* people use for updating /etc?
Long ago (2.x): diff, mv, and cp.
For a few years: mergemaster.
For 3.6 -> 3.7 -> 3.8: mergeslave.
I do confirm Han's statement that using mergeslave instead of
mergem
Hi,
I never did an upgrade process before and always did a full install from
OpenBSD 2.8 to the 3.8.
But I decided to give it a try for fun and learning only. Did 3.6 to
3.7, then to 3.8. The process was great as expected as long as you
follow the great Nick's FAQ.
Thanks Nick for them. I
On 1/8/06, Jamie Gavahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/8/06, Jason Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 1/8/06, Andris Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi, because of the recent release of patches for 3.8, I'm moving to
> > > -stable. I could build and boot the new kernel followin
On 1/8/06, Jason Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/8/06, Andris Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi, because of the recent release of patches for 3.8, I'm moving to
> > -stable. I could build and boot the new kernel following the
> > instructions at http://www.openbsd.org/stable.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 8, 2006, at 9:17 AM, Andris Delfino wrote:
Hi, because of the recent release of patches for 3.8, I'm moving to
-stable. I could build and boot the new kernel following the
instructions at http://www.openbsd.org/stable.html, but I have a
prob
> Looks like /usr/obj/ is empty, so yes you can proceed with the regular
> build by doing:
> make obj && make build
>
> Jason
>
>
Yes, I have done the "upgrade" procedure from 3.8-release to 3.8-stable
and it worked fine. No problems at all.
Hope you will be as lucky as me.
Ramiro.
On 1/8/06, Andris Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, because of the recent release of patches for 3.8, I'm moving to
> -stable. I could build and boot the new kernel following the
> instructions at http://www.openbsd.org/stable.html, but I have a
> problem with the second step to build de bin
Hi, because of the recent release of patches for 3.8, I'm moving to
-stable. I could build and boot the new kernel following the
instructions at http://www.openbsd.org/stable.html, but I have a
problem with the second step to build de binaries, which is:
rm -r /usr/obj/*
The error I get is:
rm:
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Han Boetes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Are you considering mergeslave as well?
>
> No, if only for the fact that I wasn't aware of its existence
> until you mentioned it just now.
Well it's much faster and easier to use than mergemaster. Do give
it a try.
# Han
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
The questions is, what *do* people use for updating /etc?
I've been using mergemaster for several years now, it's an essential
tool for me. But then again, I'm perfectly happy to just dump it
into ~/bin on my boxes if there's no general interest.
Hi,
On my 3.8OBSD driven laptop I suddenly get this error during bootup:
"mount_nfs: bad MNT RPC: RPC: Timed Out"
What exactly does this mean?
Best regards,
Rico
Han Boetes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Since gdiff isn't needed anymore, do you think mergemaster could be
> > > integrated in the base system one of those days,
> >
> > I'm considering this.
>
> Are you considering mergeslave as well?
No, if only for the fact that I wasn't aware of its ex
Hi!
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 05:26:35PM +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote:
>So far, I have been using pan.
>However, it tends to become painfully slow when the groups contain more
>than 30.000 messages; exponentially slow.
>On the other hand, I don't want to re-ask old questions, and prefer the
>archive of
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 01:49:57PM +0100, Emmanuel Jarri wrote:
> Thanks for this interesting discussion.
>
> Concerning your advice using L2TPv3 :
> How to use this in OpenBSD ?
> I'm currently trying to build an L2TP/IPSec VPN, and the only L2TP
> implementations I found are :
> rp-l2tp (sourcef
Thanks for this interesting discussion.
Concerning your advice using L2TPv3 :
How to use this in OpenBSD ?
I'm currently trying to build an L2TP/IPSec VPN, and the only L2TP
implementations I found are :
rp-l2tp (sourceforge)
l2tpd-0.69 (discontinued)
sl2tps (from FreeBSD)
The only one I managed
On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 21:39:03 +0100
Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 13:41:50 -0500
> "Will H. Backman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've just crossed the 10,000 downloads of the OpenBSD VMWare image since
> > I posted it a few weeks ago.
> > Unfortunate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jacob Meuser wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 12:57:40PM +0300, Dmitij Lebed wrote:
>
>>> you might want to try installing the libtool port/package and using
>>> 'make LIBTOOL=/usr/local/bin/libtool', instead of just 'make'. not
>>> sure if that will
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 12:57:40PM +0300, Dmitij Lebed wrote:
> > you might want to try installing the libtool port/package and using
> > 'make LIBTOOL=/usr/local/bin/libtool', instead of just 'make'. not
> > sure if that will fix this, but it might ..
> >
>
> I've started make LIBTOOL=/usr/loc
On Sat, 7 Jan 2006, Chris wrote:
Stupid mistake...
Never mind... It works.
Can you please elaborate, for the archives...
Thanks !
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jacob Meuser wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 01:58:19AM +0300, Dmitij Lebed wrote:
>> May be I wrote in wrong place, excuse me... :)
>> I've standard openbsd-3.8 on i386 machine.
>> I've compiled verlihub (dc++ hub - http://verlihub.sourceforge.net/).
I have tried booting FreeBSD, which should have SMP support per
default, and it also fails to find more than one CPU. And this
particular server is even listed here:
http://www.bnv-bamberg.de/home/ba3294/smp/rbuild/
as successfully booting FreeBSD. Switching the CPUs around hangs the
machine, so
So far, I have been using pan.
However, it tends to become painfully slow when the groups contain more
than 30.000 messages; exponentially slow.
On the other hand, I don't want to re-ask old questions, and prefer the
archive of gmane.org, which as of now contains almost 100.000 posts.
With numbers
Hello Robert,
> At: http://www.monkey.org/openbsd/archive/misc/0005/msg00055.html
>
> ...it says:
>
> " We just installed OpenBSD on our new Pentuim 3 Dual processor, and
> currently, OpenBSD doesn't support dual processor hardware yet."
It also says that particular posting is over five years o
43 matches
Mail list logo
