G'day,
I have a bunch of Supermicro machines with a gear identified by
FreeBSD as:
asr0: ADAPTEC 2010S FW Rev. 3B05, 2 channel, 256 CCBs, Protocol I2O
I also remember having seen something like 'SmartRaid VI'.
I can't donate it, but with time I can do something like
'put a couple of boxen and a
Followed some instructions from last year
(http://openbsd.cz/~pruzicka/vpn.html) and as per a fair number of other
posts, I seem to be having the NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN problem.
(Checking the errors via isakmpd -d -L )
185443.335663 Default log_packet_init: starting IKE packet capture to file
"/var/
that DID it...!
thank you!
two issues with this, for the archives:
1)
$mailprog = '/bin/perl -wT ../bin/nms_sendmail -t -oi';
instead of the publicized:
$mailprog = '/bin/perl -wT ../bin/nms_sendmail -t -io';
and
2) make sure the /etc/protocols file is in the chroot.
methinks
openbsd 3.7-stable (i386)
i'm trying to config nms-formmail- part of a set of "secure" scripts to
have the same functionality as some common "matt's script archive" ones
(http://nms-cgi.sourceforge.net).
In any event, I've been troubleshooting this minor but itchy problem for
some time now wh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi
i am having trouble installing a few of the packages from 3.7
postgresql,aide,syslog-ng all pkg_add fine
but
LPRng,gawk,tcpcat all return with errors
when i pkg_add LPRng it returns the following :-
pkg_add ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/3.7/packages/i386/LPRng-3
Hello dear friends,
I am sorry, I do not know how to program in C++, I was looking for
something in "plain C", not C++. I seems that as Otto stated, complex.h
is a C99 thing and OpenBSD does not fully support C99.
Anyway, I understand it better now. I will see whether I am able to
modify the prog
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
so spake Erik Sabowski (sabowski):
> i thought that leaving 63 sectors free at the start of each disk would be
> enough room, but apparently not. when i bumped it up to an offset of 3120
> sectors, it worked perfectly.
You need to leave at least 8192 bytes
Hi,
I'm fairly new to OpenBSD so please bare with me. For the past week or
so I've been trying to connect my OpenBSD box to a Microsoft VPN server
using the pptp client from pptpclient.sourceforge.net without success.
Here is my current setup:
OpenBSD 3.6 (just the basics, no X-windows)
I've r
Did somebody fix this?
Or do somebody know a workaround?
I use 3.8-beta, but It didn't work with 3.7.
Every time I try to use I get the following message:
ath0: no valid channels for regdomain NONE...
If I changed /usr/src/sys/dev/ic/ar5xxx.c above:
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/ic/ar5xxx.c,
> > > Do you know where can I get the complex.h file, or please can you point
> > > me in the right direction? I am puzzled now.
What you posted is not a C program it is a C++ program. If you
actually use the C++ compiler it works fine. You don't need to "find
the header file" if you actua
Robin wrote:
I am running the base install of OpenBSD 3.7 with the
mod_perl-1.29p0.tgz package as well as
p5-HTML-Mason-1.26.tgz package.
However when I go to setup HTML mason, with the
following:
PerlModule HTML::Mason::ApacheHandler
SetHandler perl-script
PerlHand
First guess is that you have a problem with your handler.pl file. Can
you get it working with a basic sample file?
I haven't used Mason in years, but that's a good place to start (as your
message below points out).
-- Ian
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, Robin wrote:
Hello,
I am running the base ins
Hello,
I am running the base install of OpenBSD 3.7 with the
mod_perl-1.29p0.tgz package as well as
p5-HTML-Mason-1.26.tgz package.
Both packages installed fine (I believe)
However when I go to setup HTML mason, with the
following:
PerlModule HTML::Mason::ApacheHandler
SetHa
ALERT!
This e-mail, in its original form, contained one or more attached files that
were infected with a virus, worm, or other type of security threat. This e-mail
was sent from a Road Runner IP address. As part of our continuing initiative to
stop the spread of malicious viruses, Road Runner s
ALERT!
This e-mail, in its original form, contained one or more attached files that
were infected with a virus, worm, or other type of security threat. This e-mail
was sent from a Road Runner IP address. As part of our continuing initiative to
stop the spread of malicious viruses, Road Runner s
On Friday 02 September 2005 13:32, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, Ramiro Aceves wrote:
>
> > Hello dear OpenBSD fans.
> >
> > I am trying to compile a C program (Numerical Electromagnetics Code,
> > NEC, for antenna modelling) that needs complex numbers. I compiled it
> > with gcc on
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, Ramiro Aceves wrote:
> Hello dear OpenBSD fans.
>
> I am trying to compile a C program (Numerical Electromagnetics Code,
> NEC, for antenna modelling) that needs complex numbers. I compiled it
> with gcc on Linux with no special problems. It is an originaly fortran
> written
On Friday 02 September 2005 01:54 am, Ted Unangst wrote:
> you have to leave room for the real disk labels.
>
> sd1: |label--|
> sd2: |label--|
> ccd0:|label--|
>
> if you set things up like above, the sd labels get trounced.
>
i thought that
Is /usr/include/g++/backward/complex.h what you mean?
Jasper
On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 17:49:19 +0200
Ramiro Aceves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello dear OpenBSD fans.
>
> I am trying to compile a C program (Numerical Electromagnetics Code,
> NEC, for antenna modelling) that needs complex numbers.
find /usr/include | xargs grep __real__
led me to:
/usr/include/g++/complex
-Original Message-
From: Ramiro Aceves [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 10:49 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: complex.h under OpenBSD
Hello dear OpenBSD fans.
I am trying to compile
Hello dear OpenBSD fans.
I am trying to compile a C program (Numerical Electromagnetics Code,
NEC, for antenna modelling) that needs complex numbers. I compiled it
with gcc on Linux with no special problems. It is an originaly fortran
written program that nowadays is translated into C for conveni
Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 01:53:03PM +0100, Karl Austin wrote:
Hi,
I'm just testing out OpenBGPD here, and am trying to set multiple
communities for a BGP peer, however it appears that no matter what I
try, only the very last community specified gets set, overwriting th
Making, drinking tea and reading an opus magnum from Toni Mueller:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 01.09.2005 at 13:15:54 -0400, Michael Shalayeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > we do not want their driver.
> > i betcha it'd be a piece of goo size of minneapolis
> > and we would not be able to maintain it ev
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 01:53:03PM +0100, Karl Austin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm just testing out OpenBGPD here, and am trying to set multiple
> communities for a BGP peer, however it appears that no matter what I
> try, only the very last community specified gets set, overwriting those
> previous. I
Aside from the aforementioned pkg_add net-snmp...
There is a decent tutorial on the net-snmp web site... and some other
decent ones around for mtrg... Chroot httpd will take some finessing
to get it to display the mrtg data, or run it unchrooted if you are on
a less important box.
The other thi
hi
i am having trouble installing a few of the packages from 3.7
postgresql,aide,syslog-ng all pkg_add fine
but
LPRng,gawk,tcpcat all return with errors
when i pkg_add LPRng it returns the following :-
pkg_add ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/3.7/packages/i386/LPRng-3.8.21p0.t
gz
Can't find
ftp
Hi,
I'm just testing out OpenBGPD here, and am trying to set multiple
communities for a BGP peer, however it appears that no matter what I
try, only the very last community specified gets set, overwriting those
previous. I've scoured Google and the lists and can't seem to see this
addressed a
Joco Salvatti wrote:
Hi all,
I have a firewall with a "xl0 at pci0 dev 9 function 0 3Com 3c905 100Base-TX"
rev 0x00: irq 11, address 00:60:97:d3:77:85" network interface card, and I'd
like to know how to activate SMNP under my OpenBSD system to capture the
informations and generate the input to
Hi all,
I have a firewall with a "xl0 at pci0 dev 9 function 0 3Com 3c905 100Base-TX"
rev 0x00: irq 11, address 00:60:97:d3:77:85" network interface card, and I'd
like to know how to activate SMNP under my OpenBSD system to capture the
informations and generate the input to MRTG.
Thanks
--
Joco
On 9/1/05, John Kintaro Tate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I read the pf.conf and the pfctl manpages as I am trying to set up
> > some special rules for my OpenBSD Server (3.7).
You also need to read
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/index.html
Ted Unangst wrote:
> you have to leave room for the real disk labels.
>
> sd1: |label--|
> sd2: |label--|
> ccd0:|label--|
>
> if you set things up like above, the sd labels get trounced.
I am just astonished about the above explanation. So
Hi all,
I've never really used OpenBSD. I had it installed on a machine, but didn't
do much with it. I was always happy with my Gentoo Linux boxes.
But now i have the following problem: We have a network connection that we
have to share among 13 ppl, but on that internet connection we are only
al
Hi,
On Fri, 02.09.2005 at 00:26:36 +0200, Markus Wernig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...] I am also a bit undecided about the usefulness
> | of such devices.
> Erm ... wasn't it you to suggest "that the control channel could
> be used to break end-to-end encryption into two pieces, originating or
Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Coming back to an open terminal that I know I locked was a bit of a shock.
> Almost makes me wonder if xlock can be trusted.
If you use any mode other than a blank screen it's definitely not to be
trusted. All those eye candy modes are designed to be eye candy
Antti Nykdnen schrieb:
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 09:04:48AM +0200, Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
"You see, most blokes will be playing at 10. Youre on 10, all the way
up, all the way up...Where can you go from there? Nowhere. What we do,
is if we need that extra push over the cliff...Eleven. One l
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 09:04:48AM +0200, Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
> "You see, most blokes will be playing at 10. Youre on 10, all the way
> up, all the way up...Where can you go from there? Nowhere. What we do,
> is if we need that extra push over the cliff...Eleven. One louder."
"Why dont y
Ted Unangst schrieb:
i don't understand why people keep asking the same question. if there
were some "fast" sysctl knob, why would we set it to "slow"? why would
there even be such a retarded knob?
From Spinal Tap:
"You see, most blokes will be playing at 10. Youre on 10, all the way
up,
37 matches
Mail list logo
