Re: Wifi frustration (SUCCESS)

2005-05-21 Thread Chris Zakelj
Chris Zakelj wrote: I should probably add that I did check the archives, where the solutions tended to point towards "Just buy an access point, they're just as cheap." I would (they're around), but that defeats the intent of learning how to do it, trying to reduce underdesk wire clutter, and

Re: libiconv fails at ports - 3.7

2005-05-21 Thread Uwe Dippel
On Sat, 21 May 2005 13:21:52 -0700, Jacob Meuser wrote: >> I'm trying to build wget from ports, 3.7, fresh install. >> What has gone wrong ? > > clean install or upgrade? is the ports tree clean? As clean as can be, after an install on a new harddisk, reboot, afterboot, tar xfvz ports.tar.gz, c

cannot make server certificate in courier-imap

2005-05-21 Thread Robin
Hello, I have installed courier-imap-3.0.5p2.tgz to my new install of 3.7 and am following the instructions listed at the end of the pkg_add process: 1. Copied all files from /usr/local/share/emapmples/courier-imap to /etc/courier-imap 2. Set the CN in imapd.cnf to the hostname I am using. Since

Re: Network performance

2005-05-21 Thread Steve Shockley
Sandro wrote: That's odd. I have a 3905tx-m in my openbsd box, but it isn't doing much, so that may be why it appears to work fine. I have the same card in FreeBSD boxes, and a few linux boxes and they perform great there. Are there maybe tweaks involved on an openbsd platform that are required

Re: OpenBGP Setup Question

2005-05-21 Thread Manon Goo
This is rather off topic ... but can the cisco be configured not to complain about this ? Is there a howto / configuration example available explaining how to setup the cisco and the OpenBGPD side when "depend on" is enabled ? Thanks Manon --On 20. Mai 2005 06:51:47 -0600 j knight <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Wifi frustration

2005-05-21 Thread Steve Shockley
Chris Zakelj wrote: So I suppose the best question to ask is, has anyone encountered a 2.1 friendly card, or am I up a creek? I believe my Compaq Deskpro 5233MMX is PCI 2.1, and it's worked with two different wi cards; a Netgear MA311 and a Sohoware NCP130. I did purchase a cheap ral card fo

Re: DNS Configuration Problem

2005-05-21 Thread sbr
Silly question, but then so are mistakes. Did you put the second half of the rndc.key output into your /var/named/etc/named.conf file? I just configured bind for the first time yesterday, so its all very fresh in my mind. sbr. On Sat, 21 May 2005, Sandro wrote: I don't run bind on my ope

Looking for info re: IPSec & MTU

2005-05-21 Thread Richard P. Koett
OpenBSD is working great instead of the Cisco router that our VPN peer recommended. Thanks again to the developers who make it all possible. I notice that we're receiving some fragmented packets, however. It's not a big deal but I'd like to see if things can be better optimized (and learn a bit in

Re: libiconv fails at ports - 3.7

2005-05-21 Thread Jacob Meuser
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 10:22:52PM +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote: > I'm trying to build wget from ports, 3.7, fresh install. > What has gone wrong ? clean install or upgrade? is the ports tree clean? > (The same happens on pfstat, etc.) > > ===> wget-1.8.2 depends on: gmake-3.80p0 - not found > ===>

Re: DNS Configuration Problem

2005-05-21 Thread Sandro
I don't run bind on my openbsd box, but isn't it setup to chroot into /var/named? I believe that you need to put rndc.key relative to the chroot'd environment (/var/named/etc/...) ...of course, it's a shot in the dark, I don't know how you configured bind, if you changed anything at all etc... H

DNS Configuration Problem

2005-05-21 Thread Michael
Hello. I have recently installed OpenBSD 3.7 on my future router and I had the surpise to see that I am not able to properly config DNS (bind) on this box. I have generated "/etc/rndc.key" with the help of rndc-confgen. The file is successfully generated and I "cat" and see its content, it is nic

Re: Network performance

2005-05-21 Thread Siegbert Marschall
Hi, > More Mhz. Not crappy nics, get xl,fxp,dc etc. Or maybe gigabit nics like > em(4). I think he has xl and sk in the machine, sk is probably the most decent thing one can get at the moment. xl I had quite mixed results in the past, so changing that one into another sk might be all the change ne

Re: DNS Configuration Problem

2005-05-21 Thread Matthew L. Shobe
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 07:02:46AM -0700, Michael wrote: > I have recently installed OpenBSD 3.7 on my future > router and I had the surpise to see that I am not able > to properly config DNS (bind) on this box. > I have generated "/etc/rndc.key" with the help of > rndc-confgen. > > The file is su

Re: DNS Configuration Problem

2005-05-21 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2005-05-21 at 16:02:46 Michael wrote: > This is when I check again, and yes, "/etc/rndc.key" > is there but "/usr/sbin/named" again tells me that it > is not there. Read the named(8) manpage; it uses a chroot to /var/named by default. Put your rndc.key file in /var/named/etc, and you should be

Re: DNS Configuration Problem

2005-05-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
--On 21 May 2005 07:02 -0700, Michael wrote: I have generated "/etc/rndc.key" with the help of rndc-confgen. You don't need to do this manually, it's done by /etc/rc automatically. Set named_flags="" in rc.conf.local (or rc.conf if you want to make slightly more work for yourself next upgrad

Re: CART with multiple if_aliases?

2005-05-21 Thread Jason Dixon
On May 21, 2005, at 1:43 PM, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: Could somebody please enlighten me if it is possible to use CARP when one interface has several ip aliases? If it's in the docs I have missed it completely, sorry. Yes. -- Jason Dixon DixonGroup Consulting http://www.dixongroup.net

Re: xconsole customize.

2005-05-21 Thread Stein Boerge Sylvarnes
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 10:15:10PM +0300, Mike wrote: > i was not able to find any information from anywhere, how could i split > long messages to many lines instead of one line in xconsole, so i don't > have to scroll horizontal? > Try this resource setting: XConsole.*.wrap:word Possible

Re: Network performance

2005-05-21 Thread Sandro
> * Antonios Anastasiadis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-21 11:27]: > > Are all the xl-based cards crap without exceptions? > > yes. > That's odd. I have a 3905tx-m in my openbsd box, but it isn't doing much, so that may be why it appears to work fine. I have the same card in FreeBSD boxes, and a

CART with multiple if_aliases?

2005-05-21 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
Could somebody please enlighten me if it is possible to use CARP when one interface has several ip aliases? If it's in the docs I have missed it completely, sorry. Per olof

libiconv fails at ports - 3.7

2005-05-21 Thread Uwe Dippel
I'm trying to build wget from ports, 3.7, fresh install. What has gone wrong ? (The same happens on pfstat, etc.) ===> wget-1.8.2 depends on: gmake-3.80p0 - not found ===> Verifying install for gmake-3.80p0 in devel/gmake ===> Checking files for gmake-3.80p0 `/usr/ports/distfiles/make-3.80.tar.

Re: Alpha - floppy as root device ?

2005-05-21 Thread Nick Holland
Simon Fryer wrote: > All, > >> A while ago Steve Murdoch tapped: > >> I have an Alphaserver 1000. >> >> The SCSI drives have failed so I have installed a PCI IDE contoller and >> IDE drive. >> >> The SRM doesnt recognise the IDE so after install I wont be able to boot >> from the drive. >> >

Re: Alpha - floppy as root device ?

2005-05-21 Thread Martin Reindl
Steve Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Can someone throw me in the right direction. > > I have an Alphaserver 1000. > > The SCSI drives have failed so I have installed a PCI IDE contoller > and IDE drive. > > The SRM doesnt recognise the IDE so after install I wont be able to

Re: Network performance

2005-05-21 Thread Henning Brauer
* Antonios Anastasiadis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-21 11:27]: > Are all the xl-based cards crap without exceptions? yes.

xconsole customize.

2005-05-21 Thread Mike
i was not able to find any information from anywhere, how could i split long messages to many lines instead of one line in xconsole, so i don't have to scroll horizontal?

Re: bridge segment LAN/DMZ

2005-05-21 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
Stuart Henderson a icrit : There isn't too much point in using a bridge for this - there's no need for it, it's more complicated, makes ftp more difficult, makes it difficult to provide redundancy of the firewall if you decide you want it, makes problem diagnosis more difficult, and by plugging

Re: bridge segment LAN/DMZ

2005-05-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
--On 21 May 2005 11:39 +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: But now, yes, the setup you describe could be what I was refering to. So basically, what are the pros/cons in separating a LAN from a DMZ (I say DMZ because some of the servers should be available from outside using port forwarding on the fir

Re: Network performance

2005-05-21 Thread Peter Hessler
I have had nothing but problems with xl cards. E.g. I was trying to do NFS on my home network, all 100baseT equipment. xl cards got 600k/sec at their fastest, while dc cards got 6000k/sec. On Sat, 21 May 2005 11:21:44 +0200 Antonios Anastasiadis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : I don't remember whe

Re: Booting OpenBSD without any console output

2005-05-21 Thread Rickard Dahlstrand
A couple of more direct questions: Have anyone successfully booted a kernel without any console output? What related kernel options can I play with? If not, where in the kernel source should I start digging? Thanks, Rickard. Rickard Dahlstrand wrote: >Hi, > >I'm trying to connect a modem to the

Re: bridge segment LAN/DMZ

2005-05-21 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
Joel Rees a icrit : Of course, it's not a standard terminology or diagramming method. Do you happen to have range A and range B separated, so that all machines in range B would be in, for instance, 192.168.0.[1..15] (thus, 192.168.0.0/28) and all machines in range A would be in 192.168.0.[17.

Re: ssh

2005-05-21 Thread Joel Rees
On 2005.5.19, at 01:11 AM, J.C. Roberts wrote: On Thu, 19 May 2005 00:12:29 +0900, Joel Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This whole thread has me wondering if I haven't been kidnapped by aliens. No, not recently. Since the accident where you toasted the neural interface on the Enterprise, we'

Re: Network performance

2005-05-21 Thread Antonios Anastasiadis
I don't remember where I got it, but I always had the impression that at least some of the 3coms where good cards, like those with the 3c905B chip. Am I wrong here? Are all the xl-based cards crap without exceptions? > xl is crap.

Re: bridge segment LAN/DMZ

2005-05-21 Thread Joel Rees
and what you are wanting to do is something like this (internet) <-[x]obsd firewall[i0][i1] [x]obsd firewall[i0]-> (private address range{A} LAN with no port forewarding) [x]obsd firewall[i1]-> (private address range{B} LAN with port forwarding) but without assigning IP addresses to i0

Re: Alpha - floppy as root device ?

2005-05-21 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Sat, 21 May 2005 14:05:45 +1000, Steve Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hi all, > >Can someone throw me in the right direction. > >I have an Alphaserver 1000. > >The SCSI drives have failed so I have installed a PCI IDE contoller and >IDE drive. > >The SRM doesnt recognise the IDE so after

Re: Network performance

2005-05-21 Thread Henning Brauer
* Philip Olsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-20 21:34]: > > In the end, I'm just looking for advice about how to increase > > performance in the cheapest way possible :) > More Mhz. Not crappy nics, get xl,fxp,dc etc. Or maybe gigabit nics > like em(4). xl is crap. sk is probably the best you c

Re: bridge segment LAN/DMZ

2005-05-21 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
Jason Dixon a icrit : Yes, this sounds similar to what you want to do. So basically, you want to bridge $ext_if with $dmz_if, and NAT $lan_if:network to ($ext_if). The NAT will happen first, then the outbound packet should "see" the DMZ server announcing itself via the arp "proxy". It sou

Re: bridge segment LAN/DMZ

2005-05-21 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
Joel Rees a icrit : and what you are wanting to do is something like this (internet) <-[x]obsd firewall[i0][i1] [x]obsd firewall[i0]-> (private address range{A} LAN with no port forewarding) [x]obsd firewall[i1]-> (private address range{B} LAN with port forwarding) but without assign