Re: RFC: Move to C++14

2015-02-19 Thread Cemil Azizoglu
Trusty is not dropped. At least, not because we have moved to C++14. If supporting Trusty were as simple as having compiler support, we already have that with the PPA for 4.9 Chris pointed out. Though, other reasons making that support difficult remain. But those are not related to the choice of co

Re: RFC: Move to C++14

2015-02-19 Thread Cemil Azizoglu
Correct. On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Kevin Gunn wrote: > right, aren't android base & gmocks are also out of sync ? > br,kg > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Cemil Azizoglu < > cemil.azizo...@canonical.com> wrote: > >> Trusty is not dropped. At least, not because we have moved to C++14.

Re: RFC: Move to C++14

2015-02-19 Thread Kevin Gunn
right, aren't android base & gmocks are also out of sync ? br,kg On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Cemil Azizoglu < cemil.azizo...@canonical.com> wrote: > Trusty is not dropped. At least, not because we have moved to C++14. If > supporting Trusty were as simple as having compiler support, we alrea

Re: RFC: Move to C++14

2015-02-19 Thread Daniel van Vugt
IMHO needing PPAs is less preferable to just working out-of-the box. I was aiming for and achieved the latter. Also PPAs don't help non-deb distros, which we should be mindful of (and have achieved in desrt's work on Fedora). But I'm over it. We all have plenty of other things to worry about.