Il giorno mer, 29/01/2014 alle 09.35 +1100, Christopher James Halse
Rogers ha scritto:
> On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 12:32 +0100, Marco Trevisan wrote:
> > Instead of doing this manually, line per line, I think that bzr
> > (q)shelve can be very useful to stash chunks of sub-file changes in a
> > quicke
Il giorno mar, 28/01/2014 alle 15.03 -0800, Kevin DuBois ha scritto:
> I think we have 3 issues that drive up diff size:
> 1) Bzr has branches, but they aren't cheap enough. The simple fact
> that you have to compile each branch in its own directory is too big
> of a cost to branch as often as I w
On 29.01.2014 12:22, Marco Trevisan wrote:
Where all my work is done only in work dir, and I can use bzr switch to
move to a different branch that I might create or fetch in BRANCHES.
See [1] for more hints, but that definitely made my workflow with bzr
much more productive (so, that switching b
On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 15:03 -0800, Kevin DuBois wrote:
> I think we have 3 issues that drive up diff size:
>
> 1) Bzr has branches, but they aren't cheap enough. The simple fact that you
> have to compile each branch in its own directory is too big of a cost to
> branch as often as I would in git.
