we definitely broke in the last round
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Daniel van Vugt <
daniel.van.v...@canonical.com> wrote:
> I think there are likely many case where we fear an ABI break is happening
> when really it's not. Like some of last night's landings.
>
> In future I shall have to re
I think there are likely many case where we fear an ABI break is
happening when really it's not. Like some of last night's landings.
In future I shall have to remind myself to point this out in the MP
description... "I'm changing the server headers but it's not an ABI/API
break".
Of course,
note...with the script, you still have to manually take care of the
0.0.whatever-0ubtunu(1not2) at the top of changelog
and you still have to get MIR_VERSION_PATCH # in CMakeList.txt at the top
dir level
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Robert Ancell
wrote:
> Find attached a script you can use to
Find attached a script you can use to bump the ABI on libmirserver to save
time doing it manually.
Run from the bzr checkout with:
$ chmod +x bump_abi.py
$ ./bump_abi.py
Enjoy!
--Robert
bump-abi.py
Description: Binary data
--
Mir-devel mailing list
Mir-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or
