On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Alan Griffiths
wrote:
In extracting some sensible default behaviour from USC I've touched on
an issue (highlighted by Alexandros) that needs discussion. As some of
interested parties may not have tracked the MP I've copied it here:
> We have always assumed one
OK, makes sense, thanks for the color.
br,kg
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Alan Griffiths <
alan.griffi...@canonical.com> wrote:
> On 15/06/15 15:38, Kevin Gunn wrote:
> > Hey Alan -
> > For #1, I would think it's easy to conceive of use cases where you
> > might have a system level arbiter th
On 15/06/15 15:38, Kevin Gunn wrote:
> Hey Alan -
> For #1, I would think it's easy to conceive of use cases where you
> might have a system level arbiter that might want to have, for
> instance, multiple user sessions in a spread potentially.
> Maybe this means that the surfaces are still full sc
Hey Alan -
For #1, I would think it's easy to conceive of use cases where you might
have a system level arbiter that might want to have, for instance, multiple
user sessions in a spread potentially.
Maybe this means that the surfaces are still full screen, but just resized
for such a view?
in which
