Re: Mir Version 1, stable ABIs and licences

2016-10-24 Thread Alan Griffiths
On 13/10/16 10:33, Alan Griffiths wrote: > The team is meeting IRL next week and should further discuss > these issues. I've updated the discussion doc (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WryM41-PPg011iFIe7AFkG_FWdB4JloMNkDV1RxP36I) to reflect my notes of these discussions. Please help fix anythi

Re: Mir Version 1, stable ABIs and licences

2016-10-13 Thread Alan Griffiths
On 13/10/16 02:59, Daniel van Vugt wrote: > My personal view is that we should drop this discussion. I disagree. The team is meeting IRL next week and should further discuss these issues. Without the current discussion, however, we would not be prepared. > > We have been mindful of reducing ABI b

Re: Mir Version 1, stable ABIs and licences

2016-10-12 Thread Cemil Azizoglu
> My personal view is that we should drop this discussion. > > We have been mindful of reducing ABI breaks for years but that gets trumped > by the need to implement missing features etc. > > Mir code landings have been extremely active recently, with thousands of > lines changing every day or so.

Re: Mir Version 1, stable ABIs and licences

2016-10-12 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Alternatively, we can skip the whole "what constitutes 1.0" discussion and do the fashionable thing: just make version 0.26 into version 26. :) On 13/10/16 09:59, Daniel van Vugt wrote: My personal view is that we should drop this discussion. We have been mindful of reducing ABI breaks for ye

Re: Mir Version 1, stable ABIs and licences

2016-10-12 Thread Daniel van Vugt
My personal view is that we should drop this discussion. We have been mindful of reducing ABI breaks for years but that gets trumped by the need to implement missing features etc. Mir code landings have been extremely active recently, with thousands of lines changing every day or so. And to m

Re: Mir Version 1, stable ABIs and licences

2016-10-07 Thread Alan Griffiths
On 04/10/16 09:03, Daniel van Vugt wrote: > This email thread is a mess. Please enable comments in the doc. > > Also I suggest making this a public discussion (CC'd). > Done. -- Mir-devel mailing list Mir-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman

Re: Mir Version 1, stable ABIs and licences

2016-10-04 Thread Daniel van Vugt
This email thread is a mess. Please enable comments in the doc. Also I suggest making this a public discussion (CC'd). On 04/10/16 00:46, Alan Griffiths wrote: A document to start the discussion: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WryM41-PPg011iFIe7AFkG_FWdB4JloMNkDV1RxP36I/ -- Mir-deve