On 21/11/14 01:37, Daniel van Vugt wrote:
> I'm not convinced *DisplayChanger are good abstractions. If you're
> touching them then maybe we can think of a cleaner way to approach the
> task of changing displays :)
Yes, Alexandros made a similar point yesterday. I'm not yet clear on the
right abst
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 2:50 AM, Alan Griffiths
wrote:
As part of the mir::Server API migration I'm looking at some
acceptance
tests that customize the [frontend]DisplayChanger.
Now, with the phone we've not got any downstreams that use this
customization so it is currently hidden.
But I thin
I'm not convinced *DisplayChanger are good abstractions. If you're
touching them then maybe we can think of a cleaner way to approach the
task of changing displays :)
http://objology.blogspot.com.au/2011/09/one-of-best-bits-of-programming-advice.html
http://www.benhallbenhall.com/2013/01/naming
