On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Alan Griffiths
wrote:
On 01/05/14 16:51, Cemil Azizoglu wrote:
The platform interface is not much different from mir server and
client ABI in terms of backward/forward compatibility.
+1
Regardless, I think these should be moved out of the dynamic loader's
d
On 01/05/14 16:51, Cemil Azizoglu wrote:
> The platform interface is not much different from mir server and
> client ABI in terms of backward/forward compatibility.
+1
--
Mir-devel mailing list
Mir-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinf
The platform interface is not much different from mir server and client ABI
in terms of backward/forward compatibility. So it should probably get
versioned like the ABI # for server/client (ie. option 2) since that is
what we are used to doing already. It takes a bit of careful care, though.
But I
(1) seems sensible after the api stabilizes a bit. Otherwise, wouldn't be
just increasing the required bin version of the platform anyway right?
I've been hit by using the wrong platform lib version (my own fault) but I
would have caught it earlier by either Chris' approach or approach (2) in
the
Does anyone have a preference on which direction to go with:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mir/+bug/1293944
?
I can imagine either solution proposed in the bug should work. Maybe
someone can think of a third option?
Regardless of the solution though it will take multiple releases to see
the b
