Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951
--- Comment #16 from Stephen Kitt 2010-11-24 09:55:02 EST ---
I don't know what's causing the problem in Comment 12, but I have
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653674
--- Comment #5 from Jaroslav Reznik 2010-11-24 10:21:58
EST ---
+1
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userpref
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653674
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653674
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-24
12:03:06 EST ---
qt-4.7.1-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653674
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Invalid declare statement in macros.mingw32 with some packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657478
Summary: Invalid declare statement in macros.m
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657478
--- Comment #1 from Ivan Romanov 2010-11-26 04:12:59 EST ---
hello Anders.
May I see your mingw32-python package?
--
Configur
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657478
--- Comment #2 from Anders Wäänänen 2010-11-26 04:18:55 EST
---
Yes, this was based on an OpenSuSE package:
http://download.no
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657478
--- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-11-26 04:43:34
EST ---
Agreed this is a bug, and your suggestion looks good.
Want t
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657478
--- Comment #4 from Anders Wäänänen 2010-11-26 05:25:14 EST
---
Created attachment 463052
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/att
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657478
--- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-11-26 05:47:41
EST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Created attachment 463052 [detail
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653674
--- Comment #8 from Ivan Romanov 2010-11-26 05:58:15 EST ---
I installed qt-4.7.1-3.fc14.x86_64. I do test and it's now work. Th
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657478
--- Comment #6 from Anders Wäänänen 2010-11-26 08:07:02 EST
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> If you want to apply for commit acc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657478
--- Comment #7 from Erik van Pienbroek 2010-11-26
08:19:31 EST ---
Do you already have a package submitted to Fedora which can
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657478
--- Comment #8 from Anders Wäänänen 2010-11-26 08:23:45 EST
---
No, I don't have a package ready yet, but I do plan to submit o
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657478
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657478
--- Comment #10 from Anders Wäänänen 2010-11-26 08:39:51 EST
---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Are you okay with me applying the c
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649564
--- Comment #5 from David 2010-11-27 13:24:57 EST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> This should be fixed with mingw32-binutils-2.20
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653674
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-28
15:42:55 EST ---
qt-4.7.1-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable re
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653674
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479874
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649564
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-01
17:00:50 EST ---
mingw32-binutils-2.20.1-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209
--- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System
2010-12-01 17:00:38 EST ---
mingw32-binutils-2.20.1-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649564
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619799
Andrew Beekhof changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629717
Andrew Beekhof changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634614
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Beekhof 2010-12-03 07:45:39
EST ---
Done
Spec file is in the same location, updated SRPM is:
htt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629717
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634614
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595006
Bug Zapper changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539698
Bug Zapper changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509940
Bug Zapper changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502206
Bug Zapper changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468997
Bug Zapper changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634614
Andrew Beekhof changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661312
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System
2010-12-08 18:02:43 EST ---
mingw32-webkitgtk-1.3.6-2.fc14 has been submitted as an u
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634614
--- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen 2010-12-08 19:50:32
EST ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: http
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661312
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Sailer 2010-12-09 05:54:13
EST ---
Thanks for taking this and for the quick response!
I've updated
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661312
raghavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661312
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661312
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Sailer 2010-12-13 09:09:18
EST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> 1. The spec file name must match the b
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661312
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Sailer 2010-12-13 09:10:13
EST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I have some nitpicking too.
Thanks Ka
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661312
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661312
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Sailer 2010-12-14 16:27:05
EST ---
Thanks Eric for the review!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661312
Thomas Sailer changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661312
--- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-12-14 16:53:53 EST
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: htt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661312
Thomas Sailer changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634614
Andrew Beekhof changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553971
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System
2010-12-17 04:18:01 EST ---
mingw32-nsis-2.46-1.el5 has been submitted as an update f
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529569
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529756
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529560
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530047
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System
2010-12-17 15:32:11 EST ---
mingw32-webkitgtk-1.3.6-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530047
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530047
--- Comment #6 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2010-12-19
06:16:38 EST ---
Spec URL:
http://roma.fedorapeople.org/specs/mingw32-tk.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634621
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Beekhof 2010-12-21 09:41:39 EST
---
New spec file and srpm:
http://www.clusterlabs.org/~beekhof/ma
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634621
--- Comment #2 from Adam Stokes 2010-12-21 13:44:46 EST ---
According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MinGW#Dependen
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634621
--- Comment #4 from Lon Hohberger 2010-12-21 15:32:43 EST ---
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines
Followin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634621
Lon Hohberger changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634621
Lon Hohberger changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634621
--- Comment #5 from Lon Hohberger 2010-12-21 15:36:00 EST ---
Looks like there is a problem with my permissions; I can't set fed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634621
Lon Hohberger changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634621
Andrew Beekhof changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530047
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530047
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530047
--- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-12-22 23:45:32 EST
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: http
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: mingw32-bzip2 is missing a static package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665539
Summary: mingw32-bzip2 is missing a static package
Produ
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665539
--- Comment #1 from amori...@users.sourceforge.net 2010-12-24 10:33:35 EST ---
Created attachment 470628
--> https://bugzilla.r
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665539
--- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-12-24 10:47:46
EST ---
Amorilia, can you request commit rights for this package, th
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209
Andrew Beekhof changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530047
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665539
--- Comment #3 from amori...@users.sourceforge.net 2010-12-25 15:44:13 EST ---
Sure, thanks for the quick response, and for the d
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594575
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665539
--- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-12-27 11:32:50
EST ---
You need to request 'commit'.
However I realized that maybe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665539
--- Comment #5 from amori...@users.sourceforge.net 2010-12-28 05:08:13 EST ---
Indeed, I am no packager, whence the button withho
e does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug n
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209
Andrew Beekhof changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209
Andrew Beekhof changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209
--- Comment #37 from Erik van Pienbroek
2010-12-30 08:12:00 EST ---
(In reply to comment #36)
> Packages I'm still looking into
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209
--- Comment #38 from Andrew Beekhof 2011-01-01 05:52:00
EST ---
(In reply to comment #37)
> (In reply to comment #36)
> > Packa
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209
--- Comment #39 from Erik van Pienbroek
2011-01-01 07:02:24 EST ---
(In reply to comment #38)
> (In reply to comment #37)
> > W
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209
--- Comment #40 from Andrew Beekhof 2011-01-01 09:23:25
EST ---
Everything was from F-14 or F-14 updates with only gcc and glib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209
--- Comment #41 from Erik van Pienbroek
2011-01-01 09:35:58 EST ---
That's very strange...the rawhide mingw32-gettext changes s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553971
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System
2011-01-03 12:33:05 EST ---
mingw32-nsis-2.46-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634621
Bill Nottingham changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634621
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634621
Andrew Beekhof changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634621
--- Comment #9 from Lon Hohberger 2011-01-05 16:52:20 EST ---
MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms th
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634621
Andrew Beekhof changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634621
--- Comment #11 from Lon Hohberger 2011-01-05 17:03:11 EST ---
ACCEPT based on comment #9.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634621
--- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-01-06 09:40:29 EST
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: htt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634621
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634621
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System
2011-01-10 18:10:35 EST ---
mingw32-qpid-cpp-0.8-0.2.fc14 has been submitted as an up
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634621
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634621
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System
2011-01-12 00:31:28 EST ---
mingw32-qpid-cpp-0.8-0.2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedo
501 - 600 of 5082 matches
Mail list logo