Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629791
--- Comment #5 from Felipe Contreras 2010-09-03
07:05:00 EDT ---
It's on the guidelines already:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324
Adam Stokes changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467418
Bug 467418 depends on bug 467324, which changed state.
Bug 467324 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-portablexdr - MinGW Windows
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467418
--- Comment #22 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-09-05 13:35:11 EDT ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: https:/
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: *.dll name mismatch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630522
Summary: *.dll name mismatch
Product: Fedora
Version: 13
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630522
--- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-09-06 02:25:11
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> * I noticed that it's Fedora's *.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630522
--- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius 2010-09-06 02:44:50
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> BTW, mixi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209
Adam Tkac changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2010-09-06
03:57:16 EDT ---
mingw32-runtime-3.18-1.fc14 has been submitted as an updat
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630522
--- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-09-06 05:55:21
EDT ---
The "Fedora MinGW" project is a little misnamed. We're real
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209
--- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember 2010-09-06 06:59:15 EDT
---
mingw32-gcc doesn't appear to build against mingw32-runtime-3.18,
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629791
--- Comment #6 from Kalev Lember 2010-09-06 07:19:19 EDT
---
Requires: rpm is needed for mingw32-cmake, mingw32-configure, ming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629791
--- Comment #7 from Felipe Contreras 2010-09-06
07:53:49 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Requires: rpm is needed for mingw32
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629791
--- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-09-06 08:03:47
EDT ---
Remember in all this that mingw32-* packages are only suppos
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629791
--- Comment #9 from Felipe Contreras 2010-09-06
08:12:39 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Remember in all this that mingw32-*
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629791
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209
--- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-09-06 08:51:06
EDT ---
Also this broke another build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630522
--- Comment #4 from Ralf Corsepius 2010-09-06 09:46:37
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> The "Fedora MinGW" project is a littl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630522
--- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-09-06 10:18:23
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > The
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209
Daniel Berrange changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630522
Chris Johns changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
. It's not useful to have these sorts of
discussions in bugzilla comments. Please use the mailing list.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209
--- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-09-07 07:13:17
EDT ---
.. and switch to mingw-w64 as soon as we can.
--
Configure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209
--- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-09-07 07:12:31
EDT ---
Basically after a long discussion with Kai Tietz, we came to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209
--- Comment #10 from Daniel Berrange 2010-09-07 07:20:39
EDT ---
I'm wondering if the problem is due to Fedora using SJLJ excep
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209
--- Comment #11 from Adam Tkac 2010-09-07 08:07:28 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Basically after a long discussion with Kai
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209
--- Comment #12 from Adam Tkac 2010-09-07 08:16:43 EDT ---
Another interesting information is that mingw32-runtime-3.15.2-5 rebu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209
--- Comment #13 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-09-07 08:51:36
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Another interesting information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209
--- Comment #14 from Daniel Berrange 2010-09-07 09:03:12
EDT ---
In my tests any mingw-runtime version built against gcc 4.5.x
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209
--- Comment #15 from Adam Tkac 2010-09-07 09:17:44 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> In my tests any mingw-runtime version bui
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209
--- Comment #16 from Kalev Lember 2010-09-07 09:38:55 EDT
---
There's a number of interesting patches in tdm-gcc build
http://d
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209
--- Comment #17 from Daniel Berrange 2010-09-07 09:55:55
EDT ---
The libgcceh.patch looks particularly interesting - it definit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209
Adam Tkac changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209
--- Comment #20 from Adam Tkac 2010-09-08 10:10:51 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> The libgcceh.patch looks particularly int
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209
--- Comment #21 from Daniel Berrange 2010-09-08 10:17:05
EDT ---
I tried rebuilding everything with DWARF instead of SJLJ and i
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467418
Daniel Berrange changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614047
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209
John Stebbins changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633058
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613993
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633846
--- Comment #1 from Gilboa Davara 2010-09-14 10:31:18 EDT
---
Created an attachment (id=447236)
File: backtrace
--
Configure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [abrt] mingw32-binutils-2.19.51.0.14-1.fc12: pe_implied_import_dll:
Process /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/bin/ld was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613993
Gerd Hoffmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633058
Gerd Hoffmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614047
Gerd Hoffmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614047
--- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-09-16 18:56:11 EDT ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: https://
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613993
--- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-09-16 18:55:29 EDT ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: https://
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613993
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2010-09-17
07:13:44 EDT ---
mingw32-celt051-0.5.1.3-3.fc14 has been submitted as an up
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613993
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633058
Gerd Hoffmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633058
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633058
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633058
--- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek 2010-09-17
08:01:17 EDT ---
Thanks for the hint, I'll add it before importing the packag
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633058
--- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-09-17 12:10:13 EDT ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: https://
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613993
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System
2010-09-23 08:56:47 EDT ---
mingw32-celt051-0.5.1.3-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613993
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543147
--- Comment #5 from Stefan Riemens 2010-09-25 05:44:14
EDT ---
New version:
spec url: http://riemens.mine.nu:8080/mingw32-SDL_i
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543154
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543154
--- Comment #8 from Stefan Riemens 2010-09-27 02:44:31
EDT ---
Thanks for taking on the review!
Updated spec: http://riemens.m
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543154
--- Comment #9 from Erik van Pienbroek 2010-09-27
06:52:07 EDT ---
Please don't use the release number 0, but start with 1. Oth
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543154
--- Comment #10 from Erik van Pienbroek
2010-09-27 07:33:50 EDT ---
One other small thing, the %defattr line needs to be %defat
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543147
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619799
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508746
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2010-09-28
12:18:06 EDT ---
mash-0.5.20-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209
--- Comment #23 from Erik van Pienbroek
2010-10-01 06:59:00 EDT ---
Just to let you people know, I'm currently working on getti
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: mingw32-gcc installs files both inside and outside the sysroot
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641423
Summary: mingw32-gcc installs files both insid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599567
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Bonzini 2010-10-08 13:20:55 EDT
---
The dependency is brought in by libgomp, see bug 641423.
--
Con
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599567
Paolo Bonzini changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641423
Paolo Bonzini changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641429
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641429
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641423
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Bonzini 2010-10-09 05:51:45 EDT
---
Created attachment 452488
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attac
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599567
Paolo Bonzini changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599567
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641727
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Bonzini 2010-10-10 14:18:45 EDT
---
Didn't mean to make it private.
--
Configure bugmail: https://b
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641726
Paolo Bonzini changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641727
Paolo Bonzini changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641726
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641726
--- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-10-10 14:59:27
EDT ---
Paolo it's always a good idea to push a scratch build throug
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641726
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641727
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Bonzini 2010-10-11 05:53:55 EDT
---
Uploaded new version that actually builds in mock/koji, see
http
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641726
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Bonzini 2010-10-11 05:54:03 EDT
---
Yeah, I had to sort out the certificates yesterday. Uploaded new
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641727
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599567
Paolo Bonzini changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599567
--- Comment #6 from Erik van Pienbroek 2010-10-11
08:13:04 EDT ---
As I see it we have two possible solutions to this bug:
1. S
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599567
--- Comment #7 from Daniel Berrange 2010-10-11 08:35:20
EDT ---
Having a separate '-devel' package seems wrong to me. All mingw
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641423
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Bonzini 2010-10-11 08:37:03 EDT
---
koji scratch build from the patch at
https://koji.fedoraproject.o
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599567
--- Comment #8 from Paolo Bonzini 2010-10-11 08:50:23 EDT
---
> Having a separate '-devel' package seems wrong to me. All mingw
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543147
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633058
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543154
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543147
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641726
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641727
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641727
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Bonzini 2010-10-12 03:57:07 EDT
---
Fixed, updated spec uploaded.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bug
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642208
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508746
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2010-10-13
01:56:27 EDT ---
mash-0.5.20-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 sta
201 - 300 of 5082 matches
Mail list logo
