Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608644
Jan Lieskovsky changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608644
--- Comment #1 from Jan Lieskovsky 2010-06-28 07:38:08
EDT ---
This issue affects the versions of the libpng package, as shippe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608644
Jan Lieskovsky changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608644
--- Comment #2 from Tomas Hoger 2010-06-28 07:46:27 EDT ---
*** Bug 608642 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510368
Bug Zapper changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608644
Glenn Randers-Pehrson changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608644
Jan Lieskovsky changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608644
--- Comment #6 from Jan Lieskovsky 2010-06-29 10:45:28
EDT ---
Created libpng tracking bugs for this issue
Affects: fedora-all
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608644
--- Comment #7 from Jan Lieskovsky 2010-06-29 10:45:32
EDT ---
Created mingw32-libpng tracking bugs for this issue
Affects: fe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: CVE-2010-2249 libpng: Memory leak when processing Physical Scale
(sCAL) images [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609162
Summary: CVE-201
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609162
--- Comment #1 from Jan Lieskovsky 2010-06-29 11:17:22
EDT ---
Adding parent bug CVE-2010-1205
New bodhi update url:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609162
Jan Lieskovsky changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609162
Jan Lieskovsky changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608644
Vincent Danen changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608644
--- Comment #9 from Vincent Danen 2010-06-29 13:22:13 EDT
---
This also looks like it would affect libpng10, looking quickly at
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608644
--- Comment #10 from Glenn Randers-Pehrson 2010-06-29
13:34:14 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> This also looks like it would
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608644
--- Comment #11 from Glenn Randers-Pehrson 2010-06-29
13:36:59 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Looks like this is the upstre
Status Whiteboard|public=20100625,reported=20 |public=20100625,reported=20
|100626,source=bugzilla,rhel |100626,source=bugzilla,rhel
|-3/libpng=affected/impact=l |-3/libpng=affected/impact=l
|ow/cvss2=4.3/AV:N
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608644
--- Comment #12 from Glenn Randers-Pehrson 2010-06-29
13:43:12 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Looks like this is the upstre
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608644
--- Comment #13 from Glenn Randers-Pehrson 2010-06-29
13:44:43 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #8)
>
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608644
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System
2010-06-29 15:19:43 EDT ---
libpng-1.2.44-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608644
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System
2010-06-29 15:19:54 EDT ---
libpng-1.2.44-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608644
--- Comment #16 from Vincent Danen 2010-06-29 16:54:43 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Yes, it does. Upstream has declared
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504782
Tomas Hoger changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504782
Jan Lieskovsky changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Bierfert
2010-07-02 11:39:57 EDT ---
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2290258
J
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951
Nerijus Baliunas changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951
--- Comment #9 from Andreas Bierfert
2010-07-07 00:29:50 EDT ---
It has not been submitted upstream yet. It however is included
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324
Peter Robinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: new upstream version available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613665
Summary: new upstream version available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613665
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951
--- Comment #10 from Nerijus Baliunas
2010-07-13 09:14:03 EDT ---
http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/mingw32-wine-gecko-1.0.0-3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324
--- Comment #30 from Ryan O'Hara 2010-07-13 10:58:02 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #29)
> Hey Richard, so does that mean I need t
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324
--- Comment #31 from Peter Robinson 2010-07-13 12:39:41
EDT ---
I'm still around to do the review so let me know when your read
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324
--- Comment #32 from Ryan O'Hara 2010-07-13 17:04:37 EDT ---
SPEC URL:
http://people.redhat.com/~rohara/mingw32/portablexdr/ming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599227
Ryan O'Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467418
--- Comment #8 from Ryan O'Hara 2010-07-16 15:41:46 EDT ---
Just a heads up that mingw32-portablexdr is build and the packages a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467418
--- Comment #9 from Daniel Berrange 2010-07-19 13:11:02
EDT ---
The original review src RPM is horrifically out of date. This i
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613993
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614047
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614047
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614047
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613993
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613993
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608644
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System
2010-07-26 22:49:52 EDT ---
mingw32-libpng-1.2.44-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608644
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System
2010-07-26 22:50:17 EDT ---
mingw32-libpng-1.2.44-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614047
Mamoru Tasaka changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613993
Mamoru Tasaka changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613993
--- Comment #2 from Gerd Hoffmann 2010-08-03 12:55:34 EDT
---
The rpmlint warnings are bogous, this isn't needed with recent rp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613993
--- Comment #3 from Gerd Hoffmann 2010-08-03 18:08:09 EDT
---
Updated packages and spec file uploaded to
http://kraxel.fedorape
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614047
--- Comment #3 from Gerd Hoffmann 2010-08-03 18:12:20 EDT
---
New packages are uploaded to
http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/revie
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504782
Josh Bressers (Security Response Team) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951
Stephen Kitt changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324
Peter Robinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613993
--- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek 2010-08-07
18:14:31 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=437382)
--> (https://bugzilla.red
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: mingw32-glib2 may need to be rebuilt against Python 2.7 in F14 and
rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623338
Summary: mingw32-glib2 may need t
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623338
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-11
19:27:17 EDT ---
mingw32-glib2-2.24.1-2.fc14 has been submitted as an updat
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623338
Dave Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623338
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951
--- Comment #12 from Nerijus Baliunas
2010-08-15 08:20:36 EDT ---
After applying the patch there is another error when compilin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479874
Rafael Aquini changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42
Rafael Aquini changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479874
--- Comment #17 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-08-20 03:42:16
EDT ---
Is there a reason to close it? Someone may pick it up agai
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479874
--- Comment #18 from Rafael Aquini 2010-08-20 07:54:20 EDT
---
Richard,
This is a janitorial work on Fedora Package Review que
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42
--- Comment #8 from Rafael Aquini 2010-08-20 08:06:15 EDT ---
Richard,
Same as Bug 479874:
This is a janitorial work on Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42
--- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-08-20 08:11:55 EDT
---
A review ticket without a submitter is useless and needs to be c
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479874
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479874
--- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-08-20 08:46:12 EDT
---
If you really want to, fine, but someone will just close notrea
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623338
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-23
21:43:53 EDT ---
mingw32-glib2-2.24.1-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623338
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613993
--- Comment #5 from Gerd Hoffmann 2010-08-27 05:29:33 EDT
---
Finally found the time to continue this. Uploaded new rev3 packa
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: mingw32: libintl-8.dll instead of libintl.dll
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628199
Summary: mingw32: libintl-8.dll instead of libintl.dll
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628199
Felipe Contreras changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Update mingw32-runtime to 3.18
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209
Summary: Update mingw32-runtime to 3.18
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324
Adam Stokes changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a c
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467418
Daniel Berrange changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467418
Andrew Beekhof changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467418
--- Comment #13 from Daniel Berrange 2010-09-02 11:37:36
EDT ---
No, its only a compile time issue.
--
Configure bugmail: htt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467418
Adam Stokes changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467418
Adam Stokes changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467418
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Beekhof 2010-09-02 12:13:49
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Everything looks great except for t
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467418
Adam Stokes changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467418
Adam Stokes changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467418
--- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-09-02 12:32:11 EDT
---
You cannot review and approve your own package.
--
Configure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467418
--- Comment #19 from Andrew Beekhof 2010-09-02 13:28:41
EDT ---
Isn't it Daniel/Richard's package?
Adam is just acting as revie
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467418
--- Comment #20 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-09-02 14:30:27
EDT ---
It was my package originally, but Daniel did almost all
the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324
--- Comment #35 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-09-02 17:48:49 EDT ---
GIT done, but rohara and aphilipoff are not in the packager group,
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Many unnecessary dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629791
Summary: Many unnecessary dependencies
Product: Fedora
Ve
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209
--- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-09-03 03:29:31
EDT ---
Adam, request co-maint on this package and then you will be
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628199
--- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-09-03 03:30:28
EDT ---
You're supposed to use our gtk libraries, packaged using (eg
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629791
--- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-09-03 03:34:31
EDT ---
I don't understand the bug description. Please explain what
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467418
Daniel Berrange changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467418
Daniel Berrange changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628199
--- Comment #3 from Felipe Contreras 2010-09-03
06:23:32 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> You're supposed to use our gtk libr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629791
--- Comment #2 from Felipe Contreras 2010-09-03
06:38:27 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I don't understand the bug descript
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629791
--- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-09-03 06:57:31
EDT ---
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2445089
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629791
--- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-09-03 06:56:55
EDT ---
I removed setup and rpm since they were just inherited the f
101 - 200 of 5082 matches
Mail list logo
