Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553971
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553971
--- Comment #5 from amori...@users.sourceforge.net 2010-01-12 14:12:37 EST ---
Ok, I will report this upstream.
--
Configure bu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553971
--- Comment #6 from amori...@users.sourceforge.net 2010-01-12 14:29:46 EST ---
For reference, here's the upstream bug report:
ht
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553971
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548965
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548965
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-18
18:22:34 EST ---
mingw32-nsiswrapper-5-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553971
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-20
19:03:01 EST ---
mingw32-nsis-2.45-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553971
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-20
19:10:38 EST ---
mingw32-nsis-2.45-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553971
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548
--- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-01-21 00:46:50 EST
---
Needinfo has been set for over a month now; if there's no respo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529423
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System
2010-01-22 17:37:43 EST ---
mingw32-OpenSceneGraph-2.8.2-2.fc12 has been pushed to th
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529423
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543147
Jason Woofenden changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543154
Jason Woofenden changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543154
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543154
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548
Josh Matthews changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548
--- Comment #12 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-02-02 07:28:59
EST ---
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548
Stefan Riemens changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548
--- Comment #14 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-02-02 08:23:23
EST ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Alternatively, I'd be happy to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548
Stefan Riemens changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548
--- Comment #16 from Stefan Riemens 2010-02-02 09:08:06
EST ---
Changelog entry: (forgot to add it, sorry)
* Tue Feb 2 2010 Ste
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
601000 r-xp 00:00 0
[vsyscall]
i686-pc-mingw32-g++: Internal error: Aborted (program as)
Please submit a full bug report.
See <http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla> for instructions.
make[1]: *** [regtest.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/icullina
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567847
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567847
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567847
--- Comment #3 from Ian Cullinan 2010-02-24
22:24:03 EST ---
When I try that, I get:
Setting up Install Process
Resolving Depe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567847
--- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler 2010-02-24 23:34:49
EST ---
I don't see why mingw32-gcc can't be updated in F11, the current v
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324
Peter Robinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: mingw32 produced DLL's are not stripped
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571686
Summary: mingw32 produced DLL's are not stripped
Product:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571686
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571686
--- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2010-03-09
13:36:03 EST ---
None of the packages I build on Fedora 12 gets stripped, even th
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571686
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571686
--- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek 2010-03-09
14:07:38 EST ---
You're right that the usage of the debuginfo macro's isn't d
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571686
John Poelstra changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987
--- Comment #5 from Kalev Lember 2010-03-29 01:41:54 EDT
---
Erik, any update on this? I'd be happy to approve the package if y
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987
--- Comment #6 from Kalev Lember 2010-03-29 01:49:46 EDT
---
Oh, and regarding concerns about libvirt: according to Fedora spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951
--- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek 2010-03-29
16:44:39 EDT ---
Hi,
I'll leave the review up to somebody else as this packa
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951
--- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-03-29 16:58:21
EDT ---
I might have a look at this tomorrow, but I'm interested to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951
--- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek 2010-03-29
17:10:22 EDT ---
See the discussion on the fedora-mingw mailing list from nov
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Bierfert
2010-03-30 01:08:21 EDT ---
Also take a look here:
http://wiki.winehq.org/Gecko
(In rep
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951
Andreas Bierfert changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529756
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529560
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529569
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468993
--- Comment #5 from Bug Zapper 2010-04-27
08:18:10 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 11 is nearing its end of lif
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481433
--- Comment #2 from Bug Zapper 2010-04-27
08:48:00 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 11 is nearing its end of lif
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509940
--- Comment #9 from Bug Zapper 2010-04-27
11:31:12 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 11 is nearing its end of lif
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510368
--- Comment #4 from Bug Zapper 2010-04-27
11:33:45 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 11 is nearing its end of lif
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548
--- Comment #19 from Mihai Limbășan 2010-04-27 15:15:03 EDT
---
Sorry for the MIA - real life issues prevented me from being ab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513824
--- Comment #2 from Bug Zapper 2010-04-28
05:20:57 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 11 is nearing its end of lif
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587818
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587818
Panu Matilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508746
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-07
13:53:02 EDT ---
mash-0.5.16-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987
--- Comment #8 from Erik van Pienbroek 2010-05-13
07:43:50 EDT ---
Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-curl.spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987
--- Comment #9 from Erik van Pienbroek 2010-05-13
08:42:18 EDT ---
Forgot to mention this: the scratch build is done at
http://
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987
Dennis Gilmore changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System
2010-05-16 10:34:01 EDT ---
mingw32-curl-7.20.1-2.el5 has been submitted as an update
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System
2010-05-16 10:34:43 EDT ---
mingw32-curl-7.20.1-1.fc12 has been submitted as an updat
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System
2010-05-16 10:35:18 EDT ---
mingw32-curl-7.20.1-1.fc13 has been submitted as an updat
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System
2010-05-17 14:54:03 EDT ---
mingw32-curl-7.20.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System
2010-05-17 15:08:46 EDT ---
mingw32-curl-7.20.1-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594575
Scott Tsai changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594575
--- Comment #1 from Scott Tsai 2010-05-21 00:12:40 EDT ---
1. spec file based on one found in the Fedora MinGW mailing list arch
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Add mingw32(rpcrt4.dll) in mingw32-filesystem provides for wxWidgets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594581
Summary: Add mingw32(rpcrt4.dll) in ming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594581
Scott Tsai changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594575
Scott Tsai changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: mingw32-dlfcn-static libdl.a has no index
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595006
Summary: mingw32-dlfcn-static libdl.a has no index
Produ
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510949
--- Comment #13 from Kevin Kofler 2010-05-24 00:17:43
EDT ---
I thought it was decided to ship F13 with a MinGW toolchain binar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509940
du...@identicalsoftware.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: mingw is broken
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599227
Summary: mingw is broken
Product: Fedora
Version: 13
Platfo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599567
--- Comment #1 from Eric Blake 2010-06-03 10:09:57 EDT ---
See also this thread in the libvirt list:
https://www.redhat.com/arc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599567
Eric Blake changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: mingw32-gcc should not drag in mingw32-pthreads
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599567
Summary: mingw32-gcc should not drag in mingw32-pthreads
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324
--- Comment #24 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-06-03
10:11:03 EDT ---
Hello? This bug has outlived SUN. Please do something here
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324
--- Comment #25 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-06-03 10:18:35
EDT ---
Don't worry, if Bugzilla runs out of bits keeping thi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324
--- Comment #26 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-06-03
10:45:04 EDT ---
Well, I would like to get this off the FE-Legal blocker ti
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497492
Adam Goode changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497492
--- Comment #17 from Adam Goode 2010-06-03 15:50:23 EDT ---
Also, why is this necessary just for the mingw32 package? The native
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594581
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594575
Bug 594575 depends on bug 594581, which changed state.
Bug 594581 Summary: Add mingw32(rpcrt4.dll) in mingw32-filesystem provide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513824
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594581
--- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-06-08 09:17:49
EDT ---
Added in mingw32-filesystem version 57-1.
--
Configure bug
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513824
Paolo Bonzini changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System
2010-06-09 11:48:56 EDT ---
mingw32-curl-7.20.1-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora E
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604702
--- Comment #1 from Adam Goode 2010-06-16 10:38:51 EDT ---
In fact, here is the code from libtiff that works around the problem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Custom Fedora patch to mingw32-libjpeg breaks API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604702
Summary: Custom Fedora patch to mingw32-libjpeg breaks API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468993
Bug Zapper changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481433
Bug Zapper changed:
What|Removed |Added
1 - 100 of 5082 matches
Mail list logo