commit 602fd779ff72e25af2fdf28aaec8b8d71da75aad
Author: Marc-André Lureau
Date: Wed Apr 3 00:51:33 2013 +0200
- Fix corrupted drawing, cherry-picked from upstream (fdo#61876)
- Add a few windows related fixes
...o-not-try-to-build-util-sphinx-on-Windows.patch | 37
Summary of changes:
602fd77... - Fix corrupted drawing, cherry-picked from upstream (fdo#6 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
___
mingw mailing list
mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.or
Hi Sandro & list,
UCRT seems to be the recommended C runtime for a bit more than 2 years
now. It solves issues with utf8, C standard, interop with MSVC etc.
Do we have plans to start adding that target? Apparently we would need
a new target prefix ucrt64-, and compile crt/headers
--with-default-m
garding mingw32, I think the discussion came up some time ago when I
> proposed changing the mingw32 exception model to be able to build rust.
> If memory serves me right, there were still some use-cases for mingw32,
> perhaps mingw-gecko/wine? Michael can you add more maybe?
>
> Thanks
&
Hi
On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 4:36 PM Marc-André Lureau
wrote:
>
> Any comments? How to proceed next?
I wrote a Fedora change proposal:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F37MingwUCRT
Regarding update of the mingw-* libraries packages (to add or remove
targets in the future), I have loo
Hi Sandro
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 11:02 PM Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> Thanks Marc
>
> Just for curiosity, as you see it, does it make sense to keep both mingw
> and ucrt moving forward?
>
Interesting question, it really depends on our users I imagine.
Since Windows recommends ucrt since Windows 10
Hi
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 12:27 AM Sandro Mani wrote:
>
>
> > Interesting question, it really depends on our users I imagine.
> >
> > Since Windows recommends ucrt since Windows 10 (2015) and you can ship
> > UCRT for earlier versions up to Vista, there are very few reasons you
> > would want to
Hi
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 1:10 AM Sandro Mani wrote:
>
>
> On 28.01.22 21:50, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 12:27 AM Sandro Mani wrote:
> >>
> >>> Interesting question, it really depends on our users I imagine.
Hi
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 2:05 AM Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I've tested the mingw-openssl-3.0 update in this COPR repo [1]. All
> builds succeeded right away except for mingw-spice-gtk which I needed to
> update from version 0.37 to 0.39 (and as a dependency
> mingw-spice-protocol from versi
