Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2012-05-12
12:34:40 EDT ---
mingw-libffi-3.0.11-0.3.rc2.fc17 has been submitted as an
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
If a mingw package build produces a ".a" file that is not usable as a
static library, is there any reason to include that ".a" file in the
package at all?
The specific case I'm wondering about is mingw-pthreads. I need a
static version, and mingw-pthreads needs special attention to build a
s
Eric Smith schreef op za 12-05-2012 om 11:22 [-0700]:
> If a mingw package build produces a ".a" file that is not usable as a
> static library, is there any reason to include that ".a" file in the
> package at all?
As far as I'm concerned the goal should be that all static libraries
should have
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812575
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670
--- Comment #6 from Erik van Pienbroek 2012-05-12
17:17:37 EDT ---
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding things, but what is the use cas
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Eric Smith schreef op za 12-05-2012 om 11:22 [-0700]:
If a mingw package build produces a ".a" file that is not usable as a
static library, is there any reason to include that ".a" file in the
package at all?
On 05/12/2012 11:41 AM, Erik van Pienbroek wrote:
As far as I'm concerned the goal sh
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670
--- Comment #8 from Eric Smith 2012-05-12 18:42:37 EDT ---
The purpose of mingw-llvm is to be able to build applications for Win
Please disregard my previous message in this thread, which was sent by
mistake. (Stupid fingers!)
___
mingw mailing list
mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670
--- Comment #9 from Eric Smith 2012-05-12 18:57:14 EDT ---
Re:
How does one get something linked against the LLVM-3.0.dll
Pr
12 matches
Mail list logo
