Hi Kai,
> I am not sure if 3.15.2-5 already has support for v2
Apparently not.
> pseudo-relocations, but binutils 2.20.51 has it. So maybe try to
> specify the additional linker option
> '--enable-runtime-pseudo-reloc-v1' on dll generation. By this you can
> enforce that ld generates the old rel
2010/11/21 Thomas Sailer :
> Hi Kai,
>
> thanks for you answer!
>
> I first used a fully uptodate Fedora14 system:
> mingw32-binutils-2.20.1-1.fc14.x86_64
> mingw32-runtime-3.15.2-5.fc13.noarch
>
> Then I manually upgraded binutils:
> mingw32-binutils-2.20.51.0.10-1.fc14.x86_64
>
> Both configurati
Hi Kai,
thanks for you answer!
I first used a fully uptodate Fedora14 system:
mingw32-binutils-2.20.1-1.fc14.x86_64
mingw32-runtime-3.15.2-5.fc13.noarch
Then I manually upgraded binutils:
mingw32-binutils-2.20.51.0.10-1.fc14.x86_64
Both configurations resulted in segfaulting boost regex dlls.
2010/11/18 Thomas Sailer :
> Hi,
>
> can anybody tell me what __pei386_runtime_relocator does/is supposed to
> do?
>
> The boost regex dll segfaults on process attach within DllMain, or
> __pei386_runtime_relocator+0x1f to be exact. I'm running out of clues...
>
Hi,
can anybody tell me what __pei386_runtime_relocator does/is supposed to
do?
The boost regex dll segfaults on process attach within DllMain, or
__pei386_runtime_relocator+0x1f to be exact. I'm running out of clues...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654424
NB: I've
