Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> These sorts of issues need to go upstream to the respective projects.
> Fedora MinGW is just packaging stuff.
Build fixes are definitely a valid reason for a distro patch!
Kevin Kofler
___
mingw mailing list
mingw@li
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Erik van Pienbroek
wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> The last few months have been very silent for the Fedora MinGW SIG.
> To get things up and running again, I decided to spend some of my very
> limited spare time to package the mingw-w64 cross-compiler for Fedora.
>
> T
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 12:35:21PM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > Good job Erik and Richard! I will be testing this out ASAP with my
> > $DAYJOB apps and Win 7 64-bit.
>
> My apps require GnuTLS, which I had to rebuild myself. I encountered a
> few minor issues
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> There are also a few warnings about pointer size and (s)printf
> formatting (long vs long long), which is to be expected. I'll be working
> on these as libgcrypt is unstable at the moment.
These are solved in the latest libgcrypt and libgpgerror, which I'm sure
you'll
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Good job Erik and Richard! I will be testing this out ASAP with my
> $DAYJOB apps and Win 7 64-bit.
My apps require GnuTLS, which I had to rebuild myself. I encountered a
few minor issues.
The first was that the winsock2.h and winsock.h both define struct
fd_set, bu
On 05/16/2010 07:28 AM, Erik van Pienbroek wrote:
> The last few months have been very silent for the Fedora MinGW SIG.
> To get things up and running again, I decided to spend some of my very
> limited spare time to package the mingw-w64 cross-compiler for Fedora.
>
> Thanks to the initial work do
Hi everybody,
The last few months have been very silent for the Fedora MinGW SIG.
To get things up and running again, I decided to spend some of my very
limited spare time to package the mingw-w64 cross-compiler for Fedora.
Thanks to the initial work done by Richard W.M. Jones, I managed to get
m
