thomas gahr schreef op ma 11-10-2010 om 23:12 [+0200]:
> This sounds awesome.
> One question: is there a chance to get rid of QT_LIBINFIX=4 ? This would
> really make my day :)
Hi,
The QT_LIBINFIX=4 issue was already fixed in F14's Qt. I don't plan to
backport this to F13 in order to prevent bre
This sounds awesome.
One question: is there a chance to get rid of QT_LIBINFIX=4 ? This would
really make my day :)
___
mingw mailing list
mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
Hi Tom,
> > libraries as they're all bundled inside the Qt DLL's. So the question is
> > whether we should confirm to the way upstream wants it or the way Fedora
> > wants it. Comments are welcome.
>
> I would prefer the fedora way if it's doable without excessive packager
> workload...
The path
On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 21:39 +0200, Erik van Pienbroek wrote:
> try to rewrite the Qt .spec file. In the end I managed to get Qt
> compiled without the hacks which were originally used. As a bonus
Great! Thanks for your work!
> around this limitation, but I think we should discuss changing it to
