Re: EPEL support

2019-08-26 Thread Sandro Mani
On Sun, Aug 25, 2019, 8:16 AM Kalev Lember > wrote: Yes, I'd say go ahead and retire them. We are having enough trouble with keeping Fedora MinGW packages up to date and there's no need to complicate it with yet another branch What would it ta

Re: EPEL support

2019-08-25 Thread NightStrike
On Sun, Aug 25, 2019, 8:16 AM Kalev Lember wrote: > > On 8/24/19 22:46, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > The MinGW packages for EPEL 7 are in a very bad state. We haven't even > > started on EPEL 8 yet. > > > > Should we discontinue support for EPEL? > > > > Does anyone have any use case for EPEL?

Re: EPEL support

2019-08-25 Thread Kalev Lember
On 8/24/19 22:46, Michael Cronenworth wrote: The MinGW packages for EPEL 7 are in a very bad state. We haven't even started on EPEL 8 yet. Should we discontinue support for EPEL? Does anyone have any use case for EPEL? I'm going to retire my EPEL branches, but if anyone wants to take them o

Re: EPEL support

2019-08-24 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 8/24/19 6:47 PM, Marco Feenstra wrote: Is this Erik van Pienbroeks legacy? Yes, he maintained the core packages in EPEL and I maintained PostgreSQL. No one has taken it over. ___ mingw mailing list -- mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

EPEL support

2019-08-24 Thread Michael Cronenworth
The MinGW packages for EPEL 7 are in a very bad state. We haven't even started on EPEL 8 yet. Should we discontinue support for EPEL? Does anyone have any use case for EPEL? I'm going to retire my EPEL branches, but if anyone wants to take them over please go ahead. Thanks, Michael