https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670
--- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
mingw mailing list
mingw@lists.fedoraproject.or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670
--- Comment #16 from Eric Smith ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: mingw-llvm
Short Description: MinGW LLVM libraries for cross-development use
Owners: brouhaha
Branches: f17
InitialCC:
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670
--- Comment #15 from Erik van Pienbroek ---
Are you sure about the el6 branch? The new MinGW packaging guidelines (and thus
your current .spec file) currently only work on Fedora 17 and higher. If you
really want to target el6 then you have to us
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670
--- Comment #14 from Eric Smith ---
Thanks Michael! I'll look into why it wanted the native C++ compiler. I'm
also working on updating this to llvm 3.1, which does have to build a native
executable for llvm-config, which was formerly a script,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670
Eric Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #13 from Eric Smith
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670
Michael Cronenworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #12 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670
Michael Cronenworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
mingw-libffi-3.0.11-0.3.rc2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670
--- Comment #9 from Eric Smith 2012-05-12 18:57:14 EDT ---
Re:
How does one get something linked against the LLVM-3.0.dll
Pr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670
--- Comment #8 from Eric Smith 2012-05-12 18:42:37 EDT ---
The purpose of mingw-llvm is to be able to build applications for Win
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670
--- Comment #6 from Erik van Pienbroek 2012-05-12
17:17:37 EDT ---
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding things, but what is the use cas
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2012-05-12
12:34:40 EDT ---
mingw-libffi-3.0.11-0.3.rc2.fc17 has been submitted as an
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670
--- Comment #4 from Eric Smith 2012-05-11 03:53:48 EDT ---
Updated to fix a problem in the llvm-config script, which was attempt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670
--- Comment #3 from Eric Smith 2012-05-08 18:46:30 EDT ---
Kalev Lember let me know that for MinGW packages it is expected that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670
--- Comment #2 from Eric Smith 2012-05-08 03:19:14 EDT ---
Here's the Koji scratch build for F17 for 3.0-2:
http://koji.fedorapr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670
--- Comment #1 from Eric Smith 2012-05-08 03:15:49 EDT ---
Updated to fix optimization flags. Not sure why the debuginfo isn't
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670
Eric Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
21 matches
Mail list logo
