https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657478
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
mingw-filesystem-95-11.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657478
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
mingw-filesystem-95-11.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9379/mingw-filesystem-95-11.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657478
--- Comment #17 from Anders Wäänänen ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> I just prepped an updated package for Fedora 17:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4133139
> Could you test if this resolve this issue?
> (Note: don't use thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657478
--- Comment #16 from Erik van Pienbroek ---
I just prepped an updated package for Fedora 17:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4133139
Could you test if this resolve this issue?
(Note: don't use this package on fedora 15/16 as it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657478
--- Comment #15 from Erik van Pienbroek ---
Is the package which triggers this behaviour still available? The link
mentioned in comment #2 isn't available any more. And what is the exact
output/error message you're seeing?
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657478
--- Comment #14 from Anders Wäänänen ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> mingw32-filesystem-65-1.fc15, mingw32-binutils-2.21-1.fc15 has been pushed
> to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make
> note of it in this bug
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657478
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657478
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System
2011-03-21 23:44:32 EDT ---
mingw32-filesystem-65-1.fc15, mingw32-binutils-2.21-1.fc1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657478
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657478
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System
2011-03-17 11:57:44 EDT ---
mingw32-filesystem-65-1.fc15, mingw32-binutils-2.21-1.fc1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657478
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657478
--- Comment #10 from Anders Wäänänen 2010-11-26 08:39:51 EST
---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Are you okay with me applying the c
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657478
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657478
--- Comment #8 from Anders Wäänänen 2010-11-26 08:23:45 EST
---
No, I don't have a package ready yet, but I do plan to submit o
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657478
--- Comment #7 from Erik van Pienbroek 2010-11-26
08:19:31 EST ---
Do you already have a package submitted to Fedora which can
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657478
--- Comment #6 from Anders Wäänänen 2010-11-26 08:07:02 EST
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> If you want to apply for commit acc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657478
--- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-11-26 05:47:41
EST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Created attachment 463052 [detail
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657478
--- Comment #4 from Anders Wäänänen 2010-11-26 05:25:14 EST
---
Created attachment 463052
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/att
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657478
--- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-11-26 04:43:34
EST ---
Agreed this is a bug, and your suggestion looks good.
Want t
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657478
--- Comment #2 from Anders Wäänänen 2010-11-26 04:18:55 EST
---
Yes, this was based on an OpenSuSE package:
http://download.no
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657478
--- Comment #1 from Ivan Romanov 2010-11-26 04:12:59 EST ---
hello Anders.
May I see your mingw32-python package?
--
Configur
21 matches
Mail list logo
