On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 01:40:09AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Erik van Pienbroek wrote:
> > This looks like a false positive of clamav to me.
>
> Has anybody already uploaded it to http://cgi.clamav.net/sendvirus.cgi
> (selecting the "false positive" option)? If not, please do so; the sooner we
Erik van Pienbroek wrote:
> This looks like a false positive of clamav to me.
Has anybody already uploaded it to http://cgi.clamav.net/sendvirus.cgi
(selecting the "false positive" option)? If not, please do so; the sooner we
get ClamAV fixed, the better.
Kevin Kofler
_
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 01:44:56PM +0100, Erik van Pienbroek wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones schreef op wo 17-11-2010 om 09:18 [+]:
> > According to some virus scanning (using clamav) that I'm surprised we
> > are doing on Fedora packages, the mingw32-nsis package is identified
> > thus:
> >
> > /
Richard W.M. Jones schreef op wo 17-11-2010 om 09:18 [+]:
> According to some virus scanning (using clamav) that I'm surprised we
> are doing on Fedora packages, the mingw32-nsis package is identified
> thus:
>
> /usr/share/nsis/Stubs/zlib - Trojan.Buzus-7623
>
> Upstream NSIS keep a list of
According to some virus scanning (using clamav) that I'm surprised we
are doing on Fedora packages, the mingw32-nsis package is identified
thus:
/usr/share/nsis/Stubs/zlib - Trojan.Buzus-7623
Upstream NSIS keep a list of false positives, which indicates that
this might be one too:
http://nsis.s