Hi Erik,
I got the packages and everything seems to check out. Currently the
code that I am compiling only requires the following packages:
darwinx-gcc-5646-9.fc11.x86_64
darwinx-sdk-leopard-312_2621-14.fc11.noarch
darwinx-libstdcxx-39-3.fc11.noarch
darwinx-odcctools-691.1-0.20090617.12.fc11.x86_
Hi Erik,
I just wanted to ping you to see if you had a chance to update your
public repository as per my request below.
Thanks!
Paarvai
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Paarvai Naai wrote:
> Hi Erik,
>
> Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. I've been tied up with
&
Hi Erik,
Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. I've been tied up with
several other projects in the last week.
It sounds like you have nicely resolved some of these last
compatibility issues. That's great to hear! A few of the updated
packages (neither binary or source forms) did not mak
Hi Erik,
> libstdc++ is bundled as a seperate package, darwinx-libstdcxx. The
> pre-compiled version from the SDK shouldn't be used. The main goal of
> the darwinx toolchain right now is to create self-hosted toolchain which
> doesn't depend on binary blobs. I already removed the libstdc++ library
Hi Erik,
> Ah yes, it's something I forgot to copy/paste for the x86_64 compiler. A
> new version of the darwinx-gcc package has just been published which
> should solve both issues (a patch has also been added to fix the first
> issue).
Thanks for the quick update to the package. I downloaded t
Hi Erik,
> Some files were having the wrong SELinux context (I moved them from the
> ~/rpmbuild folder straight to the www folder). I just fixed them so they
> should work now.
Thanks. I was able to download it. Just to be safe, I uninstalled
all of my previous darwinx RPMs and re-installed the
Hi Erik,
> I just published several updated packages in the test repository for
> darwinx-filesystem, darwinx-odcctools (F11 required), darwinx-gcc,
> darwinx-gettext and darwinx-glib2. All packages which get rebuilt now
> will automatically be built for the three different arch's: ppc, i386
> and
Hi Erik,
>> Okay, I was originally confused since x86_64 objects could be compiled
>> successfully but the linking that failed. Good to know that you are
>> already aware of this and are actively working on finishing it. I'll
>> look forward to your update in the next day or so.
>
> I just looke
Hi Erik,
> Great to hear that people are still interested in the work I've done :)
Yes, this will be very useful to me and others. Many years ago it was
a huge effort to get the ppc cross-compiler working, and it was still
a pain a couple of years back to get the i386 cross-compiler working.
I'm
Hi all,
I have recently been trying to establish a working Mac OS X
cross-compiler on a Linux host for i386 and x86_64 Darwin targets. (I
already have one based on GCC 4.2.3 that is able to generate i386
code.) In searching the web, I came across this mailing list and the
good work done by Erik
10 matches
Mail list logo
