https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858070
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858070
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049550
--- Comment #2 from František Dvořák ---
My observations:
1) using obsolete m4 macros in upstream
(https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/wiki/AutoTools)
AC_PROG_LIBTOOL found in: LibRaw-0.15.4/configure.ac:10
It could be worth to let upstre
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051836
--- Comment #5 from František Dvořák ---
Thanks! Patches got into upstream (by Miroslav Lichvar), so I'll add there
comments:
#
https://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=commitdiff;h=606fdfcaece19d3e05434bde57c289102a369069
Patch1: flac-meta
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049548
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from Sandro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964437
--- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt ---
Has anything been tried meanwhile?
Has the Fedora MinGW SIG been contacted yet?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubsc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049548
František Dvořák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051836
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Sand
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049550
František Dvořák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049547
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #2 from Sandro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049548
--- Comment #2 from Sandro Mani ---
Spec URL: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw-libmng.spec
SRPM URL:
http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw-libmng-2.0.2-2.fc21.src.rpm
* Sun Jan 12 2014 Sandro Mani - 2.0.2-2
- Delete pre-built
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016887
--- Comment #4 from František Dvořák ---
(In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #3)
> Concerning the def files, according to [1] one can also generate them from
> the dll using pexports. But up to you ;) Approved!
>
Nice! I'll looks better wi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051836
--- Comment #3 from František Dvořák ---
Oh, I'm sorry. Fixed URLs:
Spec URL: http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/mingw-flac-1.3.0-1/mingw-flac.spec
SRPM URL:
http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/mingw-flac-1.3.0-1/mingw-flac-1.3.0-1.fc21.src.rpm
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051836
--- Comment #2 from Sandro Mani ---
The SRPM url points to the noarch rpm. Could you upload the SRPM?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cg
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016887
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Sand
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016887
--- Comment #2 from František Dvořák ---
(In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #1)
> - licensecheck lists MIT, BSD and ISC.
Thanks, license fixed and comments added.
>
> - (Curiosity) Why are you generating and shipping the def file?
Some
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049548
--- Comment #1 from František Dvořák ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- using obsolete m4 macros in upstream
(https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/w
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016887
--- Comment #1 from Sandro Mani ---
Looks good! Two comments:
- licensecheck lists MIT, BSD and ISC. So I'd suggest License should read:
# ares_getopt.c ares_getopt.h are BSD (3 clause)
# bitncmp.c inet_net_pton.c inet_ntop.c are ISC
# rest i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049547
František Dvořák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from
Package mingw-pthreads in Fedora 20 has been retired by epienbro
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/mingw-pthreads
___
mingw mailing list
mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
commit b8a4fd0854a6105838ad1d5a01f29143415fb651
Author: Erik van Pienbroek
Date: Sun Jan 12 18:12:59 2014 +0100
Package has been retired, obsoleted by mingw-winpthreads
.gitignore |2 -
dead.package |1 +
Package mingw-pthreads in Fedora 20 was orphaned by epienbro
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/mingw-pthreads
___
mingw mailing list
mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma
Package mingw-pthreads in Fedora devel was orphaned by epienbro
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/mingw-pthreads
___
mingw mailing list
mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai
commit eab8f70a6be38712411daad8106b493f29b1712e
Author: Erik van Pienbroek
Date: Sun Jan 12 18:07:59 2014 +0100
Package has been retired, obsoleted by mingw-winpthreads
.gitignore |2 -
dead.package |1 +
Package mingw-pthreads in Fedora devel has been retired by epienbro
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/mingw-pthreads
___
mingw mailing list
mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
Hi Frantisek,
Thanks! I'll review the four packages you mentioned.
Best,
Sandro
On 12.01.2014 16:34, František Dvořák wrote:
Hi Sandro,
I've picked mingw-ilmbase and mingw-libmng.
My MinGW package requests are:
mingw-c-areshttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016887
mingw-flac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016887
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051836
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
Hi Sandro,
I've picked mingw-ilmbase and mingw-libmng.
My MinGW package requests are:
mingw-c-areshttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016887
mingw-flac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051836
My other package requests are not for MinGW and are more hardcore
(glite-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049548
František Dvořák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049547
František Dvořák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
On 2014-01-11 15:16, Erik van Pienbroek wrote:
The following packages FAILED to rebuild:
mingw-libgsf-1.14.28-1
** Package failed to build while it succeeded during the previous mass
rebuild **
Package owner: greghellings
Time to build: 3 minutes, 16 seconds
Buil
32 matches
Mail list logo