https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979566
--- Comment #6 from Michael Cronenworth ---
I didn't see your comment that they were import libs. I should have verified
that they were.
New spec: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/mingw-postgresql.spec
New SRPM:
http://michael.cronenworth.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979566
--- Comment #5 from Kalev Lember ---
I pointed out on IRC yesterday that the package needs to ship import libraries
in the main package to able to link against the DLLs. At least libpq.a is an
import library and must go into the main package (and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979566
Michael Cronenworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from Mi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984248
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||983759
--- Comment #2 from Sandro Mani --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979566
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Sandro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979566
--- Comment #2 from Michael Cronenworth ---
(In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #1)
> (Maybe add a comment on why the links are necessary? Package seems to build
> also without the links, though I have not verified its functionality)
Required
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984248
--- Comment #1 from Michael Cronenworth ---
+ OK
! needs attention
+ The package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines
+ The spec file name matches the base package name.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines
+ The packa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979566
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Sandro
