[Bug 961408] Review Request: mingw-tesseract - MinGW Windows tesseract-ocr library

2013-07-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961408 Michael Cronenworth changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from

Re: Review swaps

2013-07-10 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 07/10/2013 07:20 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: I'll take mingw-sane-backends (will have a look tomorrow). I have mingw-tesseract awaiting review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961408 Great. Thanks! ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedora

[Bug 961408] Review Request: mingw-tesseract - MinGW Windows tesseract-ocr library

2013-07-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961408 Michael Cronenworth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...

[Bug 979564] Review Request: mingw-sane-backends - MinGW package for SANE

2013-07-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979564 Sandro Mani changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

Re: Review swaps

2013-07-10 Thread Sandro Mani
On 11.07.2013 02:02, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Hi all, I'd like to get my two packages in Fedora sooner rather than later. Feel free to contact me about review swaps for them. I see about 50 MinGW packages awaiting review. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979566 https://bugzilla

Review swaps

2013-07-10 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Hi all, I'd like to get my two packages in Fedora sooner rather than later. Feel free to contact me about review swaps for them. I see about 50 MinGW packages awaiting review. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979566 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979564 Thanks, Michae

Re: Some packages still affected by InterlockedCompareExchange regression

2013-07-10 Thread Sandro Mani
On 10.07.2013 21:22, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: Sandro Mani schreef op wo 10-07-2013 om 11:32 [+0200]: On 10.07.2013 08:20, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: For mingw32-openssl-1.0.1e-2.fc20.noarch I also couldn't find anything odd with Dependency Walker. I can find it in the rawhide version as follo

Re: Some packages still affected by InterlockedCompareExchange regression

2013-07-10 Thread Erik van Pienbroek
Sandro Mani schreef op wo 10-07-2013 om 11:32 [+0200]: > On 10.07.2013 08:20, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: > > For mingw32-openssl-1.0.1e-2.fc20.noarch I also couldn't find anything > > odd with Dependency Walker. > I can find it in the rawhide version as follows: > $ yumdownloader> > $ rpm2cpio ming

[mingw-glib2] Update to 2.37.4

2013-07-10 Thread Erik van Pienbroek
commit 1d46ad1d547f1720756d717ff85319ae44e0dca8 Author: Erik van Pienbroek Date: Wed Jul 10 19:25:09 2013 +0200 Update to 2.37.4 mingw-glib2.spec |7 +-- sources |2 +- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/mingw-glib2.spec b/mingw-glib2.sp

File glib-2.37.4.tar.xz uploaded to lookaside cache by epienbro

2013-07-10 Thread Erik van Pienbroek
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for mingw-glib2: 614f3b63ea1f012c5ed370bf3e101872 glib-2.37.4.tar.xz ___ mingw mailing list mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw

Re: Some packages still affected by InterlockedCompareExchange regression

2013-07-10 Thread Sandro Mani
On 10.07.2013 08:20, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: Sandro Mani schreef op di 09-07-2013 om 19:39 [+0200]: But to specifically answer your question: mingw-gtkspellmm30 is the only library I noticed where the rebuild did not fix the problem (but the subsequent rebuild did, so maybe it was just a matt