Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670
--- Comment #3 from Eric Smith 2012-05-08 18:46:30 EDT ---
Kalev Lember let me know that for MinGW packages it is expected that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819893
--- Comment #1 from nucleo 2012-05-08 10:14:18 EDT ---
Package builds in mock.
See http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/mi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819893
nucleo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587818
Panu Matilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
On 05/07/2012 11:19 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
> Now I get a .debuginfo package, but rpmlint reports that it doesn't
> actually contain sources. Any ideas on how to fix that?
That's expected for mingw packages, just ignore the rpmlint warning.
/usr/lib/rpm/mingw-find-debuginfo.sh doesn't have any code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670
--- Comment #2 from Eric Smith 2012-05-08 03:19:14 EDT ---
Here's the Koji scratch build for F17 for 3.0-2:
http://koji.fedorapr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670
--- Comment #1 from Eric Smith 2012-05-08 03:15:49 EDT ---
Updated to fix optimization flags. Not sure why the debuginfo isn't
