Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799398
--- Comment #5 from salsaman 2012-03-03 19:50:35 EST ---
In answer to the questions, I am attempting to compile my own package,
Package mingw32-w32api in Fedora devel has been retired by epienbro
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/mingw32-w32api
___
mingw mailing list
mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
a64f918... Package is retired, obsoleted by mingw-headers (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
___
mingw mailing list
mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis
commit a64f9185a044a7359360fafbba77ee451c33699a
Author: Erik van Pienbroek
Date: Sat Mar 3 20:43:58 2012 +0100
Package is retired, obsoleted by mingw-headers
.gitignore |3 -
dead.package|1 +
mingw32-w32api.spec | 128
Summary of changes:
4c760d5... Package is retired, obsoleted by mingw-crt (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
___
mingw mailing list
mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinf
commit 4c760d51fa2f3e469f1f9c90f2c1a74672080114
Author: Erik van Pienbroek
Date: Sat Mar 3 20:41:18 2012 +0100
Package is retired, obsoleted by mingw-crt
.gitignore|2 -
dead.package |1 +
mingw32-3.18-hack-for-gcc47.patch | 35 --
Erik van Pienbroek schreef op zo 26-02-2012 om 00:15 [+0100]:
> When the mingw-w64 toolchain for the i686-w64-mingw32 target is in place
> (which will likely be tomorrow) we can start performing a mass rebuild
> of all mingw packages in Fedora 17 against the new toolchain.
>
> Once the mass rebuil
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799398
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
