Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794726
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
commit 63f0eb56f53518c48b7c8ab3c11387bd810e1f4e
Author: Erik van Pienbroek
Date: Sun Feb 26 00:53:26 2012 +0100
Update to 2.22.52 20120225 snapshot
and dropped some obsolete configure arguments
.gitignore|1 +
mingw32-binutils.spec | 20
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for mingw32-binutils:
3e3a3dd1eb98a4b2e3bc18eb775c6b3c binutils-2.22.52.tar.bz2
___
mingw mailing list
mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
Hi everybody,
Three days ago we've received a message from Red Hat Legal that it is
okay to use the MinGW-W64 toolchain in Fedora (from their legal point of
view). As a result of this wonderful news we (Kalev and I) have worked
very hard to get the MinGW-W64 toolchain introduced in Fedora. After
a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673792
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673792
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673792
--- Comment #6 from Erik van Pienbroek 2012-02-25
16:58:54 EST ---
Based on the review remarks in the mingw-header package here
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673790
--- Comment #16 from Erik van Pienbroek
2012-02-25 16:55:39 EST ---
Let's do F-17 too :)
New Package SCM Request
=
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673790
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673790
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673790
--- Comment #13 from Erik van Pienbroek
2012-02-25 15:03:41 EST ---
New Spec URL:
http://svn.openftd.org/svn/fedora_cross/mingw
Package mingw32-filesystem in Fedora 17 has been retired by epienbro
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/mingw32-filesystem
___
mingw mailing list
mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraprojec
Package mingw32-filesystem in Fedora devel has been retired by epienbro
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/mingw32-filesystem
___
mingw mailing list
mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapro
Summary of changes:
f9e2bdf... Package is retired: renamed to mingw-filesystem (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
___
mingw mailing list
mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/li
commit f9e2bdf57d5c221b70a7782f64b99eff61ab13a2
Author: Kalev Lember
Date: Sat Feb 25 21:41:16 2012 +0200
Package is retired: renamed to mingw-filesystem
COPYING | 339 --
Toolchain-mingw32.cmake | 31 ---
dead.package |
15 matches
Mail list logo
