Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701347
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701347
--- Comment #11 from Kalev Lember 2011-06-03 15:54:01 EDT
---
Grr, don't ask me why I put thomasj instead of sailer in there, s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701347
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla 2011-06-03 15:50:39 EDT ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: https://
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701347
--- Comment #9 from Kalev Lember 2011-06-03 15:30:02 EDT
---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: ming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701347
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701347
Thomas Sailer changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701347
--- Comment #8 from Kalev Lember 2011-06-03 15:06:58 EDT
---
Thanks Thomas!
Can you set the fedora‑review flag too please?
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701347
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Sailer 2011-06-03 14:58:51
EDT ---
Looks good, thanks!
APPROVED by sailer.
--
Configure bugmail:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702846
--- Comment #5 from Kalev Lember 2011-06-03 13:53:48 EDT
---
Thanks for the review, Thomas!
(In reply to comment #3)
> + The p
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701347
--- Comment #6 from Kalev Lember 2011-06-03 13:20:41 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> mingw32-gtkmm30.noarch: E: incorrect-fs
fkoo...@tuxed.net schreef op vr 03-06-2011 om 17:03 [+0200]:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Erik van Pienbroek
> wrote:
> > Please don't let this all discourage you. If you (or anybody else) can
> > come up with methods to making the example spec file at
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packa
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Erik van Pienbroek wrote:
> Please don't let this all discourage you. If you (or anybody else) can
> come up with methods to making the example spec file at
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MinGW_Future more readable and
> smaller I would be glad to hear ab
Farkas Levente schreef op vr 03-06-2011 om 00:23 [+0200]:
> imho as in f16 there'll be a mingw32->mingw transition it's time to
> change everything which is not perfect (even if it's never perfect).
> afais mingw is now very similar to elrepo (or Driver Update Program
> http://dup.et.redhat.com/).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642208
--- Comment #13 from Erik van Pienbroek
2011-06-03 09:01:16 EDT ---
The big difference between GNU libiconv and win-iconv is th
14 matches
Mail list logo
