Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641726
--- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-10-10 14:59:27
EDT ---
Paolo it's always a good idea to push a scratch build throug
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641726
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641727
Paolo Bonzini changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641726
Paolo Bonzini changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641727
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Bonzini 2010-10-10 14:18:45 EDT
---
Didn't mean to make it private.
--
Configure bugmail: https://b
Hi Tom,
> > libraries as they're all bundled inside the Qt DLL's. So the question is
> > whether we should confirm to the way upstream wants it or the way Fedora
> > wants it. Comments are welcome.
>
> I would prefer the fedora way if it's doable without excessive packager
> workload...
The path
